Early Career Researchers between Predatory Publishing and Academic Excellence: The Views and Behaviours of the Millennials

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS
D. Nicholas, Eti Herman, A. Watkinson, Jie Xu, A. Abrizah, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, T. Polezhaeva, Marzena Świgoń, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski
{"title":"Early Career Researchers between Predatory Publishing and Academic Excellence: The Views and Behaviours of the Millennials","authors":"D. Nicholas, Eti Herman, A. Watkinson, Jie Xu, A. Abrizah, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, T. Polezhaeva, Marzena Świgoń, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski","doi":"10.17323/2500-2597.2021.1.56.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper draws on evidence of predatory publishing obtained from the 4 year-long Harbingers research study of the changing scholarly communication attitudes and behaviour of early career researchers (ECRs). The project featured longitudinal interviews for its first 3 years with 116 ECRs researching science and social sciences who came from China, France, Malaysia, Poland, Spain, UK and USA. The interview data provided the building blocks for a questionnaire survey in the 4th year, which obtained 1600 responses from a global audience, which included arts and humanities ECRs and those from Russia. These studies investigated predatory publishing as part of general questioning about scholarly communications, in other words, in context. The main finding from the interview study were: 1) ECRs generally do not publish in predatory journals; 2) they only allude to them lightly and mainly in the context of open access publishing; 3) they no longer acquaint all open access publishing with predatory journals. The questionnaire found that, as in the case of the interviews, complaints that open access is low quality publishing are diminishing, however, this positivity has been partly offset by increased concerns about the dangers of predatory journals.","PeriodicalId":45026,"journal":{"name":"Foresight and STI Governance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foresight and STI Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.1.56.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The paper draws on evidence of predatory publishing obtained from the 4 year-long Harbingers research study of the changing scholarly communication attitudes and behaviour of early career researchers (ECRs). The project featured longitudinal interviews for its first 3 years with 116 ECRs researching science and social sciences who came from China, France, Malaysia, Poland, Spain, UK and USA. The interview data provided the building blocks for a questionnaire survey in the 4th year, which obtained 1600 responses from a global audience, which included arts and humanities ECRs and those from Russia. These studies investigated predatory publishing as part of general questioning about scholarly communications, in other words, in context. The main finding from the interview study were: 1) ECRs generally do not publish in predatory journals; 2) they only allude to them lightly and mainly in the context of open access publishing; 3) they no longer acquaint all open access publishing with predatory journals. The questionnaire found that, as in the case of the interviews, complaints that open access is low quality publishing are diminishing, however, this positivity has been partly offset by increased concerns about the dangers of predatory journals.
在掠夺性出版和学术卓越之间的早期职业研究者:千禧一代的观点和行为
该论文借鉴了从为期4年的早期职业研究人员(ecr)学术交流态度和行为变化的harbinger研究中获得的掠夺性出版的证据。该项目在前三年对116名从事科学和社会科学研究的ecr进行了纵向访谈,他们分别来自中国、法国、马来西亚、波兰、西班牙、英国和美国。访谈数据为第四年的问卷调查提供了基础,该调查获得了来自全球受众的1600份回复,其中包括艺术和人文学科的ecr以及来自俄罗斯的ecr。这些研究调查了掠夺性出版,作为对学术交流的一般质疑的一部分,换句话说,在上下文中。访谈研究的主要发现是:1)ecr一般不会在掠夺性期刊上发表;2)他们只在开放获取出版的背景下淡淡地提到它们;3)他们不再将所有开放获取出版与掠夺性期刊联系起来。问卷调查发现,与采访的情况一样,关于开放获取是低质量出版的抱怨正在减少,然而,这种积极的一面已经部分地被对掠夺性期刊危险的日益关注所抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Foresight and STI Governance is an international interdisciplinary peer-reviewed open-access journal. It publishes original research articles, offering new theoretical insights and practical knowledge related to the following areas: strategic planning, science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy, foresight and other future studies. The journal considers articles on the following themes: - Foresight methods and best practices; - Long-term social and economic priorities for strategic planning and policy making; - Innovation strategies at the national, regional, sectoral, and corporate levels; - The development of National Innovation Systems; - The analysis of the innovation lifecycle from idea to the market; - Technological trends, breakthroughs, and grand challenges; - Technological changes and their implications for economy, policy-making, and society; - Corporate innovation management; - Human capital in STI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信