Socioeconomic inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health in Guyana: a time trends analysis

Gary Joseph, L. Vidaletti, C. Boston
{"title":"Socioeconomic inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health in Guyana: a time trends analysis","authors":"Gary Joseph, L. Vidaletti, C. Boston","doi":"10.29392/001c.84527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guyana is among the countries committed to achieving the sustainable development goals. This research assessed the patterns of change in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) in Guyana. Four nationally representative surveys conducted from 2009 to 2019 were assessed. Temporal trends in RMNCH indicators were assessed at the national level, by place of residence, and by wealth index. The slope index and concentration index of inequality were calculated to assess trends in inequalities over time. The average absolute annual change (AAAC) of the indicators was calculated using a weighted variance regression. From 2006 to 2019, we observed an increase in the coverage of institutional delivery (from 82.6% to 97.7%), and exclusive breastfeeding (from 21.4% to 31.0%), among others. Likewise, antenatal care with four or more visits increased from 77.4% in 2009 to 84.7% in 2019. The opposite was observed for coverage of current contraceptive use (modern methods) (from 32.7% to 28.2%), family planning needed satisfied (from 49.6% to 43.8%), tetanus toxoid in pregnancy (from 31.7% to 8.2%) and full vaccination coverage (from 82.0% to 63.4%). Under-five stunting prevalence decreased from 18.0% to 9.2% and the under-five mortality rate from 40.4 to 29.3 per 1,000 live births. The gap between the poorest and richest women tended to decrease for seven out of the 16 intervention indicators, as well as for under-five stunting prevalence and under-five mortality rate. Institutional delivery was the best performer in increasing coverage and decreasing inequality over time, while immunization with measles was the worst performer. Guyana has made great progress in improving its RMNCH indicators. However, the observed decline in the coverage of several RMNCH indicators can be seen as a warning sign to redouble efforts to achieve sustainable development goals, SDGs 1 and 2, by 2030 and to reduce inequalities by lagging no one behind.","PeriodicalId":73759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.84527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guyana is among the countries committed to achieving the sustainable development goals. This research assessed the patterns of change in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) in Guyana. Four nationally representative surveys conducted from 2009 to 2019 were assessed. Temporal trends in RMNCH indicators were assessed at the national level, by place of residence, and by wealth index. The slope index and concentration index of inequality were calculated to assess trends in inequalities over time. The average absolute annual change (AAAC) of the indicators was calculated using a weighted variance regression. From 2006 to 2019, we observed an increase in the coverage of institutional delivery (from 82.6% to 97.7%), and exclusive breastfeeding (from 21.4% to 31.0%), among others. Likewise, antenatal care with four or more visits increased from 77.4% in 2009 to 84.7% in 2019. The opposite was observed for coverage of current contraceptive use (modern methods) (from 32.7% to 28.2%), family planning needed satisfied (from 49.6% to 43.8%), tetanus toxoid in pregnancy (from 31.7% to 8.2%) and full vaccination coverage (from 82.0% to 63.4%). Under-five stunting prevalence decreased from 18.0% to 9.2% and the under-five mortality rate from 40.4 to 29.3 per 1,000 live births. The gap between the poorest and richest women tended to decrease for seven out of the 16 intervention indicators, as well as for under-five stunting prevalence and under-five mortality rate. Institutional delivery was the best performer in increasing coverage and decreasing inequality over time, while immunization with measles was the worst performer. Guyana has made great progress in improving its RMNCH indicators. However, the observed decline in the coverage of several RMNCH indicators can be seen as a warning sign to redouble efforts to achieve sustainable development goals, SDGs 1 and 2, by 2030 and to reduce inequalities by lagging no one behind.
圭亚那生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康方面的社会经济不平等:时间趋势分析
圭亚那是致力于实现可持续发展目标的国家之一。这项研究评估了圭亚那生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康(RMNCH)的变化模式。评估了2009年至2019年进行的四项具有全国代表性的调查。在国家一级,按居住地和财富指数评估了RMNCH指标的时间趋势。计算了不平等的斜率指数和集中度指数,以评估不平等随时间的变化趋势。使用加权方差回归计算指标的平均绝对年变化(AAAC)。从2006年到2019年,我们观察到机构分娩(从82.6%到97.7%)和纯母乳喂养(从21.4%到31.0%)等的覆盖率有所增加。同样,四次或四次以上就诊的产前护理从2009年的77.4%增加到2019年的84.7%。当前避孕方法(现代方法)的覆盖率(从32.7%到28.2%)、计划生育需求满意度(从49.6%到43.8%)、,妊娠期破伤风类毒素(从31.7%降至8.2%)和全面疫苗接种覆盖率(从82.0%降至63.4%)。五岁以下发育迟缓的患病率从18.0%降至9.2%,五岁以下死亡率从40.4%降至29.3/1000活产。在16项干预指标中,有7项指标的最贫穷和最富有妇女之间的差距趋于缩小,5岁以下发育迟缓率和5岁以下死亡率也趋于缩小。随着时间的推移,机构提供在增加覆盖率和减少不平等方面表现最好,而麻疹免疫接种表现最差。圭亚那在改进其RMNCH指标方面取得了巨大进展。然而,观察到的几个RMNCH指标覆盖率的下降可以被视为一个警告信号,表明要加倍努力,到2030年实现可持续发展目标1和2,并通过不落后于任何人来减少不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信