Clinical Efficacy of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy at Different Pressures in the Treatment of Sudden Deafness

抗癌研究 Pub Date : 2022-03-23 DOI:10.26689/par.v6i2.3805

Xinli Feng, Shuang Dong, Jun Wang, Jie Yang, Yamei Wang, Dahui Zhang, G. Peng, Jinhua Luo

{"title":"Clinical Efficacy of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy at Different Pressures in the Treatment of Sudden Deafness","authors":"Xinli Feng, Shuang Dong, Jun Wang, Jie Yang, Yamei Wang, Dahui Zhang, G. Peng, Jinhua Luo","doi":"10.26689/par.v6i2.3805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen at different pressures in the treatment of sudden deafness. Methods: Eighty-two patients with sudden deafness treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University from September 2019 to September 2021 were selected as the research subjects. The patients were randomly divided into study group 1 and study group 2, and they were treated with hyperbaric oxygen on the basis of routine treatment, in which the pressure used was 1.8 ATA and 2.2 ATA, respectively. Oxygen was delivered via the pressure stabilizing mask for 60 minutes. The patients received two courses of treatment, each lasting 10 days. The changes in hearing (pure tone audiometry) and the clinical efficacy of both the groups were compared before and after treatment. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using SPSS 19.0. Results: The total effective rate of study group 1 was 90.00%, while that of study group 2 was 76.19%. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: For patients with sudden deafness treated with hyperbaric oxygen, the clinical efficacy of 1.8 ATA is more significant than that of 2.2 ATA.","PeriodicalId":61025,"journal":{"name":"抗癌研究","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"抗癌研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/par.v6i2.3805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen at different pressures in the treatment of sudden deafness. Methods: Eighty-two patients with sudden deafness treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University from September 2019 to September 2021 were selected as the research subjects. The patients were randomly divided into study group 1 and study group 2, and they were treated with hyperbaric oxygen on the basis of routine treatment, in which the pressure used was 1.8 ATA and 2.2 ATA, respectively. Oxygen was delivered via the pressure stabilizing mask for 60 minutes. The patients received two courses of treatment, each lasting 10 days. The changes in hearing (pure tone audiometry) and the clinical efficacy of both the groups were compared before and after treatment. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using SPSS 19.0. Results: The total effective rate of study group 1 was 90.00%, while that of study group 2 was 76.19%. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: For patients with sudden deafness treated with hyperbaric oxygen, the clinical efficacy of 1.8 ATA is more significant than that of 2.2 ATA.

查看原文本刊更多论文

不同压力高压氧治疗突发性耳聋的临床疗效观察

目的：分析不同压力高压氧治疗突发性耳聋的疗效。方法：选取2019年9月至2021年9月在河北大学附属医院就诊的82例突发性耳聋患者作为研究对象。将患者随机分为研究组1和研究组2，在常规治疗的基础上进行高压氧治疗，所用压力分别为1.8ATA和2.2ATA。氧气通过压力稳定面罩输送60分钟。患者接受了两个疗程的治疗，每个疗程持续10天。比较两组治疗前后的听力变化（纯音测听）和临床疗效。使用SPSS 19.0对所获得的数据进行统计学分析。结果：研究组1总有效率90.00%，研究组2总有效率76.19%，两组比较差异有统计学意义（p<0.05）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

抗癌研究

自引率

0.00%

发文量

135