The Comparison of Three Different Fixation Methods on Bilateral Sagittal Split Ra-mus Osteotomy Mandibular on a 3D of Fully Modelled Mandible by the Finite Ele-ment Method

S. Ghorashi, Mohammad Mehdi Keshavarzi, Shahrzad Damercheli, A. Parhiz
{"title":"The Comparison of Three Different Fixation Methods on Bilateral Sagittal Split Ra-mus Osteotomy Mandibular on a 3D of Fully Modelled Mandible by the Finite Ele-ment Method","authors":"S. Ghorashi, Mohammad Mehdi Keshavarzi, Shahrzad Damercheli, A. Parhiz","doi":"10.18502/JCR.V6I3.3258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a full mandibular CT-scan in a specific patient is used to model BSSO surgery. The purpose is to compare the three most common fixation methods which are used in BSSO surgery by finite element method. Three different fixations are studied in order to obtain the minimum displacement of the lower jaw and optimum stress and strain on the specified fixation. The methods are two parallel plates with four screws, the operation of triangular screw configuration and one plate with four screws. The plates and the screw are modeled precisely by point clouds of Synthes Brand’s plate and screw. The mechanical properties of the full mandibular and, to obtain a practical model after the surgery, the mean jaw forces are extracted from literatures. It is resulted that the minimum displacement and stresses on the mandible and fixation tools happened in the Triangular screw configuration model and the two other methods have higher stress and lower displacement. Therefore, the mandibular in triangular method, experiences little deformation and the screws tolerates lower stress and strain which is better than the other two methods.","PeriodicalId":52622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/JCR.V6I3.3258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, a full mandibular CT-scan in a specific patient is used to model BSSO surgery. The purpose is to compare the three most common fixation methods which are used in BSSO surgery by finite element method. Three different fixations are studied in order to obtain the minimum displacement of the lower jaw and optimum stress and strain on the specified fixation. The methods are two parallel plates with four screws, the operation of triangular screw configuration and one plate with four screws. The plates and the screw are modeled precisely by point clouds of Synthes Brand’s plate and screw. The mechanical properties of the full mandibular and, to obtain a practical model after the surgery, the mean jaw forces are extracted from literatures. It is resulted that the minimum displacement and stresses on the mandible and fixation tools happened in the Triangular screw configuration model and the two other methods have higher stress and lower displacement. Therefore, the mandibular in triangular method, experiences little deformation and the screws tolerates lower stress and strain which is better than the other two methods.
双侧矢状面劈裂下颌截骨三种不同固定方法在三维全模型下颌骨上的比较
在本文中,一个完整的下颌骨ct扫描在一个特定的病人被用来模拟BSSO手术。目的是比较有限元法在BSSO手术中常用的三种固定方法。研究了三种不同的固定方式,以获得最小的下颌位移和最佳的应力应变。两板平行四螺钉、三角螺钉配置操作和一板四螺钉操作。采用Synthes Brand的板和螺杆点云对板和螺杆进行了精确建模。从文献中提取下颌平均力,得到完整下颌骨的力学特性,并得到手术后的实用模型。结果表明,三角形螺钉配置模型对下颌骨和固定工具的位移和应力最小,而其他两种方法均具有较高的应力和较小的位移。因此,三角形法下颌变形小,螺钉承受应力应变小,优于其他两种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信