Bespoke automated linkage to enable analysis of covid deaths by ethnicity.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Shelley Gammon, R. Shipsey, Charlie Tomlin, Josie Plachta
{"title":"Bespoke automated linkage to enable analysis of covid deaths by ethnicity.","authors":"Shelley Gammon, R. Shipsey, Charlie Tomlin, Josie Plachta","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In early 2020 there was intense media speculation that ethnicity and Covid-19 deaths were correlated. However, the existing method of adding ethnicity to death records resulted in low linkage rates for very recent deaths. We designed and implemented a bespoke linkage in three days enabling accurate reporting to the nation. \nWe linked the 2011 England and Wales Census to death records using a range of personal identifiers. Due to time pressure, we focused on executing a single linkage method well. Deterministic linkage was chosen, using a variety of matchkeys which were tested via clerical review. To overcome the issue of addresses changing since 2011, we also linked 2020 death record residuals to the 2019 Patient Register (PR) and then made use of the 2011 PR address where it existed.  This additionally provided an indication of whether unmatched death records might be attributable to migration into England and Wales post-2011. \nThe prior linking method used NHS Number only. Although the overall linkage rate was approximately 90%, the rate for recent deaths (2nd March 2020 to 10th April 2020 in the first iteration of the linkage) was closer to 30% due to an administrative lag in adding NHS Numbers to death records. Our novel bespoke linkage method linked over 39,000 extra death records. Whilst this had minimal impact on the overall linkage rate, it improved the linkage rate for recent deaths to approximately 90%. This was without an impact on accuracy: clerical review demonstrated that the false positive rate was approximately 0.2%. A report was published using this data showing that the risk of death involving Covid-19 among some ethnic groups was significantly higher than others. \nDetermining whether Covid-19 disproportionally affected certain ethnicities was of crucial importance in the early phase of the pandemic to enable appropriate government strategies to be developed. We delivered a bespoke linkage under an exceptional time-limit without compromising on accuracy, enabling this impactful analysis with nation-wide interest and impact.","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In early 2020 there was intense media speculation that ethnicity and Covid-19 deaths were correlated. However, the existing method of adding ethnicity to death records resulted in low linkage rates for very recent deaths. We designed and implemented a bespoke linkage in three days enabling accurate reporting to the nation. We linked the 2011 England and Wales Census to death records using a range of personal identifiers. Due to time pressure, we focused on executing a single linkage method well. Deterministic linkage was chosen, using a variety of matchkeys which were tested via clerical review. To overcome the issue of addresses changing since 2011, we also linked 2020 death record residuals to the 2019 Patient Register (PR) and then made use of the 2011 PR address where it existed.  This additionally provided an indication of whether unmatched death records might be attributable to migration into England and Wales post-2011. The prior linking method used NHS Number only. Although the overall linkage rate was approximately 90%, the rate for recent deaths (2nd March 2020 to 10th April 2020 in the first iteration of the linkage) was closer to 30% due to an administrative lag in adding NHS Numbers to death records. Our novel bespoke linkage method linked over 39,000 extra death records. Whilst this had minimal impact on the overall linkage rate, it improved the linkage rate for recent deaths to approximately 90%. This was without an impact on accuracy: clerical review demonstrated that the false positive rate was approximately 0.2%. A report was published using this data showing that the risk of death involving Covid-19 among some ethnic groups was significantly higher than others. Determining whether Covid-19 disproportionally affected certain ethnicities was of crucial importance in the early phase of the pandemic to enable appropriate government strategies to be developed. We delivered a bespoke linkage under an exceptional time-limit without compromising on accuracy, enabling this impactful analysis with nation-wide interest and impact.
定制自动链接,以便按种族分析新冠肺炎死亡人数。
2020年初,媒体强烈猜测种族与新冠肺炎死亡人数相关。然而,在死亡记录中添加种族的现有方法导致最近死亡的关联率较低。我们在三天内设计并实施了定制的链接,从而能够向全国准确报告。我们使用一系列个人标识符将2011年英格兰和威尔士人口普查与死亡记录联系起来。由于时间压力,我们专注于很好地执行单个链接方法。选择了确定性链接,使用了通过文书审查测试的各种匹配键。为了解决自2011年以来地址变化的问题,我们还将2020年的死亡记录残差与2019年的患者登记册(PR)联系起来,然后使用了2011年的PR地址。这还表明,2011年后移民到英格兰和威尔士是否可能导致无与伦比的死亡记录。之前的链接方法仅使用NHS编号。尽管总体联系率约为90%,但最近的死亡率(2020年3月2日至2020年4月10日,在第一次联系中)接近30%,原因是在将NHS数字添加到死亡记录中的管理滞后。我们新颖的定制链接方法链接了39000多个额外的死亡记录。虽然这对总体联系率的影响很小,但它将近期死亡的联系率提高到了约90%。这对准确性没有影响:文书审查表明,假阳性率约为0.2%。使用这些数据发布的一份报告显示,一些族裔群体因新冠肺炎死亡的风险明显高于其他族裔群体。在大流行的早期阶段,确定新冠肺炎是否对某些种族产生了不成比例的影响至关重要,这有助于制定适当的政府战略。我们在不影响准确性的情况下,在特殊的时间限制下提供了定制的链接,使这种具有影响力的分析能够在全国范围内引起兴趣和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
386
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信