Are human rights ‘toothless’ in Australian child protection matters? Perspectives of lawyers and social workers

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
T. Walsh, K. Healy, J. Venables, Kate Thompson
{"title":"Are human rights ‘toothless’ in Australian child protection matters? Perspectives of lawyers and social workers","authors":"T. Walsh, K. Healy, J. Venables, Kate Thompson","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebac028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Human rights law is in its infancy in Australia. Some states and territories have human rights legislation that requires government officials to take human rights into account in decision-making. However, there is very little Australian case law or commentary regarding the application of human rights law to child protection matters. In this article, we discuss the potential for human rights law to influence decision-making in child protection. We interviewed lawyers and social workers who support parents in child protection matters in the state of Queensland to determine whether they thought rights-based advocacy could bring about better outcomes for their clients. Whilst some social workers were optimistic about the potential for human rights advocacy to improve outcomes for parents, lawyers generally believed that human rights law was unlikely to assist. Jurisprudence from other jurisdictions demonstrates that human rights arguments can influence outcomes in child protection matters, so additional human rights training may be needed for lawyers and judicial officers in Australia to encourage consideration of human rights in child protection cases.","PeriodicalId":51869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebac028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human rights law is in its infancy in Australia. Some states and territories have human rights legislation that requires government officials to take human rights into account in decision-making. However, there is very little Australian case law or commentary regarding the application of human rights law to child protection matters. In this article, we discuss the potential for human rights law to influence decision-making in child protection. We interviewed lawyers and social workers who support parents in child protection matters in the state of Queensland to determine whether they thought rights-based advocacy could bring about better outcomes for their clients. Whilst some social workers were optimistic about the potential for human rights advocacy to improve outcomes for parents, lawyers generally believed that human rights law was unlikely to assist. Jurisprudence from other jurisdictions demonstrates that human rights arguments can influence outcomes in child protection matters, so additional human rights training may be needed for lawyers and judicial officers in Australia to encourage consideration of human rights in child protection cases.
在澳大利亚的儿童保护问题上,人权是“无牙的”吗?律师和社会工作者的观点
澳大利亚的人权法尚处于起步阶段。一些州和地区制定了人权立法,要求政府官员在决策时考虑人权。然而,关于人权法在儿童保护问题上的适用,澳大利亚几乎没有判例法或评注。在这篇文章中,我们讨论了人权法影响儿童保护决策的潜力。我们采访了在昆士兰州支持父母处理儿童保护事务的律师和社会工作者,以确定他们是否认为基于权利的倡导可以为他们的客户带来更好的结果。虽然一些社会工作者对人权宣传有可能改善父母的成果持乐观态度,但律师们普遍认为,人权法不太可能起到帮助作用。其他司法管辖区的判例表明,人权论点会影响儿童保护事务的结果,因此可能需要对澳大利亚的律师和司法官员进行额外的人权培训,以鼓励在儿童保护案件中考虑人权问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The subject matter of the International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family comprises the following: - Analyses of the law relating to the family which carry an interest beyond the jurisdiction dealt with, or which are of a comparative nature - Theoretical analyses of family law - Sociological literature concerning the family which is of special interest to law and legal policy - Social policy literature of special interest to law and the family - Literature in related disciplines (such as medicine, psychology, demography) which is of special relevance to law and the family - Research findings in the above areas, reviews of books and relevant reports The journal has a flexible policy as to length of contributions, so that substantial research reports can be included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信