Kajian Perbandingan Akurasi DTM Pengolahan Data Foto Udara Menggunakan Metode Otomatis Dan Semi-Otomatis Filtering

Raynier Geraldino Dadu Kerong, Martinus Edwin Tjahjadi, F. Agustina
{"title":"Kajian Perbandingan Akurasi DTM Pengolahan Data Foto Udara Menggunakan Metode Otomatis Dan Semi-Otomatis Filtering","authors":"Raynier Geraldino Dadu Kerong, Martinus Edwin Tjahjadi, F. Agustina","doi":"10.34312/jgeosrev.v4i1.12046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in UAV technology produce various superior products that can be utilized for the development and analysis of natural dynamics. One of them is DTM which is a visual representation of the shape of the ground surface that is displayed in 3 dimensions. DTM is obtained from the results of DSM filtering, where all features above the ground are digitally removed using a certain method. To produce a good DTM, a good quality DSM is needed, therefore a Horizontal and Vertical accuracy analysis was carried out based on ASPRS 2015. In this study, two software with different data processing methods were used, namely automatic filtering and semi-automatic filtering from DSM to DTM. To determine the quality of DTM, spot-height data is used as a comparison which is considered to be the actual form in the field. From the series of data processing processes, DTM results were obtained which were then tested for accuracy utilizing statistical validation tests using the calculation of RMSEZ values and non-statistical validation tests (Visual) using the transverse profile method. The test results show that the DTM produced by the PCI Geomatica software with the semi-automatic filtering method has more accurate and precise quality than the DTM from the SAGA GIS software with the automatic filtering method with an elevation value of 1,249 m and RMSEz 3,542 m to the spot-height. Then the visualization of the DTM transverse profile produced by the PCI Geomatica software semi-automatic filtering method to the spot height also does not appear to experience a significant difference where the elevation at Point 1 is 0.5 m and Point 2 is 0.5 m.","PeriodicalId":34761,"journal":{"name":"Jambura Geoscience Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jambura Geoscience Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34312/jgeosrev.v4i1.12046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Advances in UAV technology produce various superior products that can be utilized for the development and analysis of natural dynamics. One of them is DTM which is a visual representation of the shape of the ground surface that is displayed in 3 dimensions. DTM is obtained from the results of DSM filtering, where all features above the ground are digitally removed using a certain method. To produce a good DTM, a good quality DSM is needed, therefore a Horizontal and Vertical accuracy analysis was carried out based on ASPRS 2015. In this study, two software with different data processing methods were used, namely automatic filtering and semi-automatic filtering from DSM to DTM. To determine the quality of DTM, spot-height data is used as a comparison which is considered to be the actual form in the field. From the series of data processing processes, DTM results were obtained which were then tested for accuracy utilizing statistical validation tests using the calculation of RMSEZ values and non-statistical validation tests (Visual) using the transverse profile method. The test results show that the DTM produced by the PCI Geomatica software with the semi-automatic filtering method has more accurate and precise quality than the DTM from the SAGA GIS software with the automatic filtering method with an elevation value of 1,249 m and RMSEz 3,542 m to the spot-height. Then the visualization of the DTM transverse profile produced by the PCI Geomatica software semi-automatic filtering method to the spot height also does not appear to experience a significant difference where the elevation at Point 1 is 0.5 m and Point 2 is 0.5 m.
空气照片数据处理采用自动和半自动过滤方法进行比较
无人机技术的进步产生了各种优越的产品,可用于开发和分析自然动力学。其中之一是DTM,它是一种以三维形式显示地面形状的视觉表示。DTM是由DSM滤波的结果得到的,其中地面以上的所有特征都通过一定的方法被数字去除。为了得到一个好的DTM,需要一个高质量的DSM,因此基于ASPRS 2015进行了水平和垂直精度分析。本研究使用了两种不同数据处理方式的软件,分别是DSM到DTM的自动滤波和半自动滤波。为了确定DTM的质量,使用点高数据作为比较,这被认为是现场的实际形式。从一系列数据处理过程中获得DTM结果,然后使用RMSEZ值计算的统计验证检验和使用横向轮廓法的非统计验证检验(Visual)检验DTM结果的准确性。试验结果表明,PCI Geomatica软件采用半自动滤波方法生成的DTM比SAGA GIS软件采用自动滤波方法生成的高程值为1249 m, RMSEz为3542 m的DTM具有更高的精度和精密度。然后,PCI Geomatica软件半自动滤波方法生成的DTM横廓线对点高度的可视化也没有出现点1高程为0.5 m和点2高程为0.5 m的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信