Injusta Distribución del Presupuesto entre las Universidades Públicas del Ecuador: Efecto Mateo

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Vicente Véliz Briones, J. Morales, Gregorio Vásconez, Luz García Cruzatty
{"title":"Injusta Distribución del Presupuesto entre las Universidades Públicas del Ecuador: Efecto Mateo","authors":"Vicente Véliz Briones, J. Morales, Gregorio Vásconez, Luz García Cruzatty","doi":"10.15366/RIEJS2021.10.1.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Ecuador, higher education system has experienced a great expansion both in the number of students who aspire to obtain a university degree and in public institutions of higher education (PIHE). Most of which are funded by the government, which historically has been impartially allocated the budgets benefiting PIHE traditionally considered elitist, for its student selection process. The aim of this investigation was to determine the impact of the Mateo effect on PIHE from Ecuador, within the 2014-2018 period. The methodology used a non-experimental design to describe the longitudinal and transversal trends. Data of 26 PIHE was gathered from governmental web pages and the data base Scopus. The analysis took into consideration the annual budget, effectiveness of its execution, number of students, the percentage assigned for research as well as the number of publications indexed in Scopus. Overall results evidenced: 1) the greater budgets given to elite PIHE, regardless of their smaller number of students and indexed publications, 2) the financial constraints affronted by less elite PIHE that hindered their academic growth, and 3) the urgent need for a change in the prevailing financial politic, that counteracts the principles of equity and quality education for all ecuatorians.","PeriodicalId":44141,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional de Educacion para la Justicia Social","volume":"10 1","pages":"197-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional de Educacion para la Justicia Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/RIEJS2021.10.1.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In Ecuador, higher education system has experienced a great expansion both in the number of students who aspire to obtain a university degree and in public institutions of higher education (PIHE). Most of which are funded by the government, which historically has been impartially allocated the budgets benefiting PIHE traditionally considered elitist, for its student selection process. The aim of this investigation was to determine the impact of the Mateo effect on PIHE from Ecuador, within the 2014-2018 period. The methodology used a non-experimental design to describe the longitudinal and transversal trends. Data of 26 PIHE was gathered from governmental web pages and the data base Scopus. The analysis took into consideration the annual budget, effectiveness of its execution, number of students, the percentage assigned for research as well as the number of publications indexed in Scopus. Overall results evidenced: 1) the greater budgets given to elite PIHE, regardless of their smaller number of students and indexed publications, 2) the financial constraints affronted by less elite PIHE that hindered their academic growth, and 3) the urgent need for a change in the prevailing financial politic, that counteracts the principles of equity and quality education for all ecuatorians.
厄瓜多尔公立大学预算分配不公平:马特奥效应
在厄瓜多尔,高等教育系统在渴望获得大学学位的学生数量和公立高等教育机构(PIHE)方面都经历了巨大的扩张。其中大部分是由政府资助的,历史上,政府一直公正地分配预算,使传统上被认为是精英的PIHE受益,用于学生选拔过程。本调查的目的是确定2014-2018年期间Mateo效应对厄瓜多尔PIHE的影响。该方法采用非实验设计来描述纵向和横向趋势。26个PIHE的数据来自政府网页和数据库Scopus。该分析考虑了年度预算、执行效率、学生人数、分配给研究的百分比以及Scopus索引的出版物数量。总体结果证明:1)给予精英PIHE的预算更多,尽管他们的学生数量和索引出版物较少;2)不那么精英的PIHE受到财政限制,阻碍了他们的学术发展;3)迫切需要改变现行的财政政策,这与所有教育工作者的公平和优质教育原则背道而驰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信