Ultrasound transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local infiltration analgesia for acute and chronic postoperative pain control after laparoscopic bilateral hernia repair : a single-center randomized controlled trial
{"title":"Ultrasound transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local infiltration analgesia for acute and chronic postoperative pain control after laparoscopic bilateral hernia repair : a single-center randomized controlled trial","authors":"M. Hosni, J. P. Soulios, D. Francart","doi":"10.56126/71.4.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : we compared the efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local infiltration on acute and chronic pain after a first laparoscopic surgical treatment of bilateral inguinal hernia performed in a day hospital.\n\nMethods : In this randomized, prospective, double-blind study, we studied 52 patients scheduled for lapa-roscopic bilateral hernia repair. The patients were randomly allocated to receive local infiltration (group 1) or a TAP block (group 2). The surgeon locally injected the patients in group 1 with a solution of 20 mL of 0.5 levo- bupivacaine. An ultrasound-guided injection of 40 mL 0.25 levobupivacaine was administered to the patients in group 2 by the anesthesiologist. The pain score was assessed using a numeric rating scale at the arrival in the recovery room, one hour after surgery and 6 hours (H+6) after arrival at the recovery room. Subsequently, the pain was assessed 24 hours (H+24), 3 weeks (D21) and 3 months (M3) after surgery.\n\nResults : We observed significant differences in terms of pain at H+6 and at H+24 in favor of the TAP block group. However, there was no significant difference between both groups in postoperative pain after 3 weeks (D21) or after 3 months (M3).\n\nConclusions : In our study, we observed a significant difference in terms of pain in favor of TAP block versus local infiltration, during the first 24 hours after a first laparoscopic treatment of inguinal hernia. We did not find any significant difference on chronic pain.","PeriodicalId":7024,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56126/71.4.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background : we compared the efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local infiltration on acute and chronic pain after a first laparoscopic surgical treatment of bilateral inguinal hernia performed in a day hospital.
Methods : In this randomized, prospective, double-blind study, we studied 52 patients scheduled for lapa-roscopic bilateral hernia repair. The patients were randomly allocated to receive local infiltration (group 1) or a TAP block (group 2). The surgeon locally injected the patients in group 1 with a solution of 20 mL of 0.5 levo- bupivacaine. An ultrasound-guided injection of 40 mL 0.25 levobupivacaine was administered to the patients in group 2 by the anesthesiologist. The pain score was assessed using a numeric rating scale at the arrival in the recovery room, one hour after surgery and 6 hours (H+6) after arrival at the recovery room. Subsequently, the pain was assessed 24 hours (H+24), 3 weeks (D21) and 3 months (M3) after surgery.
Results : We observed significant differences in terms of pain at H+6 and at H+24 in favor of the TAP block group. However, there was no significant difference between both groups in postoperative pain after 3 weeks (D21) or after 3 months (M3).
Conclusions : In our study, we observed a significant difference in terms of pain in favor of TAP block versus local infiltration, during the first 24 hours after a first laparoscopic treatment of inguinal hernia. We did not find any significant difference on chronic pain.
背景:我们比较了在日间医院首次腹腔镜手术治疗双侧腹股沟疝后,腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与局部浸润对急性和慢性疼痛的疗效。方法:在这项随机、前瞻性、双盲研究中,我们研究了52名计划接受腹腔镜双侧疝修补术的患者。患者被随机分配接受局部浸润(第1组)或TAP阻断(第2组)。外科医生为第1组患者局部注射20 mL 0.5左旋布比卡因溶液。麻醉师在超声引导下向第2组患者注射40mL 0.25左旋布比卡因。在到达康复室时、手术后1小时和到达康复室后6小时(H+6)使用数字评定量表评估疼痛评分。随后,在手术后24小时(H+24)、3周(D21)和3个月(M3)评估疼痛。结果:我们观察到在H+6和H+24时疼痛方面的显著差异,有利于TAP阻断组。然而,两组在3周后(D21)或3个月后(M3)的术后疼痛方面没有显著差异。结论:在我们的研究中,我们观察到,在首次腹腔镜治疗腹股沟疝后的前24小时内,TAP阻滞与局部浸润在疼痛方面存在显著差异。我们在慢性疼痛方面没有发现任何显著差异。
期刊介绍:
L’Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica est le journal de la SBAR, publié 4 fois par an. L’Acta a été publié pour la première fois en 1950. Depuis 1973 l’Acta est publié dans la langue Anglaise, ce qui a été résulté à un rayonnement plus internationaux. Depuis lors l’Acta est devenu un journal à ne pas manquer dans le domaine d’Anesthésie Belge, offrant e.a. les textes du congrès annuel, les Research Meetings, … Vous en trouvez aussi les dates des Research Meetings, du congrès annuel et des autres réunions.