Personal Meaning Approach: Alternative for Increasing Students' Interest in Learning

Q3 Social Sciences
Eko Purnomo, Aryadie Adnan, Jeki Purnama, B. Prahani, Firunika Intan Cahyani, F. Haris
{"title":"Personal Meaning Approach: Alternative for Increasing Students' Interest in Learning","authors":"Eko Purnomo, Aryadie Adnan, Jeki Purnama, B. Prahani, Firunika Intan Cahyani, F. Haris","doi":"10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to see the effect of teaching methods with personal meaning and traditional learning methods to increase students' interest in learning physical education at school. The experimental group had 63 participants (aged 15-17 years), while the control group had 63 samples (mean age 15-18 years). The results of research conducted using personal and conventional meaning as physical education learning methods are both ineffective in increasing students' interest in learning; in addition, the two methods have no significant (significant) difference in effectiveness between the use of personal meaning and conventional methods. This can also be seen with the calculation of the Independent Samples Test 0.739 > 0.05. If you look at the analysis results, the average NGain score for the experimental class (personal meaning) is 9.8903 or 9.8%, which is included in the less effective category. Meanwhile, the average N-Gain score for the control class (conventional) is 10.1448, or 10% is included in the less effective category. Then the researcher suggested conducting a further study with a more extended period to find out the effect of the personal meaning method in increasing students' interest in learning physical education.","PeriodicalId":37121,"journal":{"name":"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to see the effect of teaching methods with personal meaning and traditional learning methods to increase students' interest in learning physical education at school. The experimental group had 63 participants (aged 15-17 years), while the control group had 63 samples (mean age 15-18 years). The results of research conducted using personal and conventional meaning as physical education learning methods are both ineffective in increasing students' interest in learning; in addition, the two methods have no significant (significant) difference in effectiveness between the use of personal meaning and conventional methods. This can also be seen with the calculation of the Independent Samples Test 0.739 > 0.05. If you look at the analysis results, the average NGain score for the experimental class (personal meaning) is 9.8903 or 9.8%, which is included in the less effective category. Meanwhile, the average N-Gain score for the control class (conventional) is 10.1448, or 10% is included in the less effective category. Then the researcher suggested conducting a further study with a more extended period to find out the effect of the personal meaning method in increasing students' interest in learning physical education.
个人意义教学法:提高学生学习兴趣的另一选择
本研究旨在观察具有个人意义的教学方法和传统的学习方法对提高学生在学校学习体育的兴趣的效果。实验组有63名参与者(年龄15-17岁),而对照组有63个样本(平均年龄15-18岁)。使用个人意义和传统意义作为体育学习方法的研究结果在提高学生的学习兴趣方面都是无效的;此外,这两种方法在个人意义的使用上与传统方法没有显著(显著)差异。这也可以从独立样本测试0.739>0.05的计算中看出。如果你看一下分析结果,实验班(个人意义)的平均NGain分数为9.8903或9.8%,属于效果较差的类别。同时,对照类(常规)的平均N-增益得分为10.1448,或10%包含在效果较差的类别中。然后,研究人员建议进行一项更长期的进一步研究,以了解个人意义方法在提高学生学习体育兴趣方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences Social Sciences-Education
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信