Uranium and Multi-element Release from Orthogneiss and Granite (Austria): Experimental Approach Versus Groundwater Composition

IF 1.7 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Daniel Elster, Edith Haslinger, Martin Dietzel, Heinz Fröschl, Gerhard Schubert
{"title":"Uranium and Multi-element Release from Orthogneiss and Granite (Austria): Experimental Approach Versus Groundwater Composition","authors":"Daniel Elster,&nbsp;Edith Haslinger,&nbsp;Martin Dietzel,&nbsp;Heinz Fröschl,&nbsp;Gerhard Schubert","doi":"10.1007/s10498-018-9344-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, the release of elements and in particular U from five Austrian orthogneiss and granite samples into a CO<sub>2</sub>-bearing solution was investigated to describe the initial phase (24?h) of leaching focusing on the impact of ferrous (hydro)oxide formation. Experiments were conducted at ambient temperature by flushing CO<sub>2</sub>:N<sub>2</sub> gas through the reactive solution (pH<sub>initial</sub>?~?4.3) at a liquid:solid ratio of 10:1 with and without a reducing agent. The chemical evolution of the leaching solution was dominated by incongruent dissolution of silicates showing a parabolic kinetic behavior due to protective surface formation most likely caused by precipitation of amorphous Fe<sup>III</sup>/Al hydroxides. However, the relative distribution of Ca, Mg and Sr in the leaching solution excellently traced the individual bulk rock composition. The mobilization of U was highly prevented under oxidizing conditions by sorption onto ferrous (hydro)oxides, which were precipitating through ongoing silicate leaching. Therefore, the leaching behavior of individual U-bearing minerals was less relevant for U release. At reducing conditions, the above elements were accumulated in the solution, although an oversaturation regarding U<sup>IV</sup>O<sub>2</sub> was calculated. This indicates its inhibited formation within the experimental run time. The composition of experimental leaching solutions did not reflect analyzed groundwater compositions from investigated local rock-type aquifers indicating that reaction rate constants of siliceous rocks significantly differ between values found in nature and in the laboratory. Change in active mineral surface areas with ongoing weathering, accumulation of secondary precipitates, leached layer formation and given reaction time are key factors for distinct elemental release.</p>","PeriodicalId":8102,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Geochemistry","volume":"24 4","pages":"279 - 306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10498-018-9344-z","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10498-018-9344-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, the release of elements and in particular U from five Austrian orthogneiss and granite samples into a CO2-bearing solution was investigated to describe the initial phase (24?h) of leaching focusing on the impact of ferrous (hydro)oxide formation. Experiments were conducted at ambient temperature by flushing CO2:N2 gas through the reactive solution (pHinitial?~?4.3) at a liquid:solid ratio of 10:1 with and without a reducing agent. The chemical evolution of the leaching solution was dominated by incongruent dissolution of silicates showing a parabolic kinetic behavior due to protective surface formation most likely caused by precipitation of amorphous FeIII/Al hydroxides. However, the relative distribution of Ca, Mg and Sr in the leaching solution excellently traced the individual bulk rock composition. The mobilization of U was highly prevented under oxidizing conditions by sorption onto ferrous (hydro)oxides, which were precipitating through ongoing silicate leaching. Therefore, the leaching behavior of individual U-bearing minerals was less relevant for U release. At reducing conditions, the above elements were accumulated in the solution, although an oversaturation regarding UIVO2 was calculated. This indicates its inhibited formation within the experimental run time. The composition of experimental leaching solutions did not reflect analyzed groundwater compositions from investigated local rock-type aquifers indicating that reaction rate constants of siliceous rocks significantly differ between values found in nature and in the laboratory. Change in active mineral surface areas with ongoing weathering, accumulation of secondary precipitates, leached layer formation and given reaction time are key factors for distinct elemental release.

Abstract Image

奥地利正长岩和花岗岩中铀和多种元素的释放:地下水组成的实验方法
在这项研究中,从五个奥地利正长石和花岗岩样品中释放元素,特别是U,进入含二氧化碳的溶液进行了研究,以描述浸出的初始阶段(24?h),重点是铁(氢)氧化物形成的影响。实验是在常温下,在有还原剂和不加还原剂的情况下,用液固比为10:1的反应溶液(pHinitial?~?4.3)冲洗CO2:N2气体。浸出液的化学演化主要是硅酸盐的不一致溶解,表现出抛物线动力学行为,这可能是由于无定形FeIII/Al氢氧化物的沉淀造成的保护表面形成。而Ca、Mg和Sr在浸出液中的相对分布则能很好地反映出岩石的单体组成。在氧化条件下,通过吸附在铁(氢)氧化物上,高度阻止了U的动员,这些氧化物是通过持续的硅酸盐浸出沉淀的。因此,单个含铀矿物的浸出行为与铀释放的相关性较小。在还原条件下,上述元素积聚在溶液中,尽管计算了uvo2的过饱和。这表明其在实验运行时间内的形成受到抑制。实验浸出溶液的组成并不能反映所调查的当地岩石型含水层的地下水组成,这表明硅质岩石的反应速率常数在自然界和实验室中发现的值之间存在显著差异。随着持续的风化作用,活性矿物表面积的变化,次生沉淀的积累,浸出层的形成和给定的反应时间是不同元素释放的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aquatic Geochemistry
Aquatic Geochemistry 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: We publish original studies relating to the geochemistry of natural waters and their interactions with rocks and minerals under near Earth-surface conditions. Coverage includes theoretical, experimental, and modeling papers dealing with this subject area, as well as papers presenting observations of natural systems that stress major processes. The journal also presents `letter''-type papers for rapid publication and a limited number of review-type papers on topics of particularly broad interest or current major controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信