Randomised evaluation of pre-notification of trial participants before self-report outcome data collection to improve retention: SWAT86

C. Sutton, S. Cotterill, Denise Forshaw, S. Rhodes, Alexandra Haig, A. Hammond
{"title":"Randomised evaluation of pre-notification of trial participants before self-report outcome data collection to improve retention: SWAT86","authors":"C. Sutton, S. Cotterill, Denise Forshaw, S. Rhodes, Alexandra Haig, A. Hammond","doi":"10.1177/26320843221098427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Retention is considered the second highest trial methods priority in the UK after recruitment. There is limited evidence on whether notifying trial participants that a follow-up questionnaire will be sent soon (‘pre-notification’) affects retention. Methods This Study Within a Trial (SWAT) evaluated whether sending a pre-notification letter or email around 2 weeks before sending a self-report questionnaire increased retention, in terms of provision of the host trial primary outcome. The SWAT was a randomised, two-arm, parallel-design (1:1 allocation ratio) trial, controlled by ‘no pre-notification letter’. It was embedded within the WORKWELL host trial, which evaluated the impact of job retention vocational rehabilitation on work-related and health-related outcomes of employed people with inflammatory arthritis. The SWAT primary outcome was a valid response for the WORKWELL primary outcome. Results Two hundred forty-four trial participants took part in the SWAT. All were included in the analysis. Among those sent a pre-reminder, 100/121 (83%) provided a valid response for the WORKWELL primary outcome, compared to 97/123 (79%) of those not sent a pre-reminder. The estimated adjusted odds ratio was 1.28 (95% confidence interval 0.67–2.42), with a risk difference of 3.8% (95% CI -6.1 to 13.6%), favouring the prereminder. The estimated intervention cost per additional participant retained was £53.42, and the total cost per additional participant retained was £46.52. Conclusion Researchers may have a small improvement in trial retention by using pre-notification. The cost per additional participant retained is relatively low. However, further evaluations are merited.","PeriodicalId":74683,"journal":{"name":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":"107 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843221098427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Retention is considered the second highest trial methods priority in the UK after recruitment. There is limited evidence on whether notifying trial participants that a follow-up questionnaire will be sent soon (‘pre-notification’) affects retention. Methods This Study Within a Trial (SWAT) evaluated whether sending a pre-notification letter or email around 2 weeks before sending a self-report questionnaire increased retention, in terms of provision of the host trial primary outcome. The SWAT was a randomised, two-arm, parallel-design (1:1 allocation ratio) trial, controlled by ‘no pre-notification letter’. It was embedded within the WORKWELL host trial, which evaluated the impact of job retention vocational rehabilitation on work-related and health-related outcomes of employed people with inflammatory arthritis. The SWAT primary outcome was a valid response for the WORKWELL primary outcome. Results Two hundred forty-four trial participants took part in the SWAT. All were included in the analysis. Among those sent a pre-reminder, 100/121 (83%) provided a valid response for the WORKWELL primary outcome, compared to 97/123 (79%) of those not sent a pre-reminder. The estimated adjusted odds ratio was 1.28 (95% confidence interval 0.67–2.42), with a risk difference of 3.8% (95% CI -6.1 to 13.6%), favouring the prereminder. The estimated intervention cost per additional participant retained was £53.42, and the total cost per additional participant retained was £46.52. Conclusion Researchers may have a small improvement in trial retention by using pre-notification. The cost per additional participant retained is relatively low. However, further evaluations are merited.
在收集自我报告结果数据前预先通知试验参与者以提高保留率的随机评估:SWAT86
背景保留被认为是英国仅次于招募的第二高优先试验方法。关于通知试验参与者将很快发送后续问卷(“预先通知”)是否会影响保留,证据有限。方法本试验内研究(SWAT)评估了在发送自我报告问卷前2周左右发送预通知信或电子邮件是否增加了保留率,以提供宿主试验的主要结果。SWAT是一项随机、双臂、平行设计(1:1分配比例)的试验,由“无预先通知函”控制。它被纳入了WORKWELL宿主试验,该试验评估了保留工作的职业康复对炎症性关节炎从业人员与工作相关和健康相关结果的影响。SWAT主要结果是对WORKWELL主要结果的有效反应。结果244名试验参与者参加了SWAT。所有这些都包括在分析中。在那些发送了预提醒的人中,100/121(83%)对WORKWELL主要结果提供了有效的响应,而在那些没有发送预提醒的人群中,这一比例为97/123(79%)。估计的调整后比值比为1.28(95%置信区间0.67-2.42),风险差异为3.8%(95%CI-6.1-13.6%),有利于预敏。保留的每个额外参与者的估计干预成本为53.42英镑,保留的每个附加参与者的总成本为46.52英镑。结论研究人员使用预先通知可能会对试验保留率有小幅改善。保留的每个额外参与者的成本相对较低。然而,还需要进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信