Asymmetric effects of economic policy uncertainty on Bitcoin’s hedging power

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Md Hakim Ali, C. Schinckus, Md Akther Uddin, Saeed Pahlevansharif
{"title":"Asymmetric effects of economic policy uncertainty on Bitcoin’s hedging power","authors":"Md Hakim Ali, C. Schinckus, Md Akther Uddin, Saeed Pahlevansharif","doi":"10.1108/sef-05-2021-0186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nEven though Bitcoin has been often labelled as a safe haven asset class in the literature, the influence of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on the diversifying opportunities offered by Bitcoin in relation to other assets needs to be investigated. This paper aims to investigate how the EPU affects diversification of commodity, conventional, Islamic and sustainable equity returns in relation to its impact on Bitcoin returns.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors use advanced time-series econometrics, namely, multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic-dynamic conditional correlation and continuous wavelet transformation, for the analysis of the daily returns for the aforementioned assets between 01 August 2011 and 01 September 2019.\n\n\nFindings\nFirst, the authors found a strong evidence of Bitcoin’s mean reverting trend in the long run while its volatility has decreased significantly since 2013. After separating the EPU into two regimes (high and low), diversification opportunities with Bitcoin seems to disappear in a high EPU period, while the hedging opportunity tends to prevail in a low EPU period for all classes of assets. Importantly, the findings indicate that Bitcoin offers short-term diversification for sustainable and Islamic equity as well as energy stocks during a low uncertainty period. Consequently, in relation to the policy uncertainty, Bitcoin provides similar hedging opportunities than commodities like Gold and Silver. Overall, the study shows that EPU is remarkably important in explaining the average portfolio returns of Bitcoin, suggesting that this indicator can be perceived as a decent explanatory factor for portfolio diversification.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study significantly extends the empirical literature of Bitcoin’s portfolio diversification by taking EPU into consideration. To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is one of the few studies to investigate the asymmetric effects of US EPU on Bitcoin’s hedging capabilities by taking into account major conventional equity, sustainable equity, Islamic equity, gold, silver and oil.\n","PeriodicalId":45607,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Economics and Finance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-05-2021-0186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose Even though Bitcoin has been often labelled as a safe haven asset class in the literature, the influence of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on the diversifying opportunities offered by Bitcoin in relation to other assets needs to be investigated. This paper aims to investigate how the EPU affects diversification of commodity, conventional, Islamic and sustainable equity returns in relation to its impact on Bitcoin returns. Design/methodology/approach The authors use advanced time-series econometrics, namely, multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic-dynamic conditional correlation and continuous wavelet transformation, for the analysis of the daily returns for the aforementioned assets between 01 August 2011 and 01 September 2019. Findings First, the authors found a strong evidence of Bitcoin’s mean reverting trend in the long run while its volatility has decreased significantly since 2013. After separating the EPU into two regimes (high and low), diversification opportunities with Bitcoin seems to disappear in a high EPU period, while the hedging opportunity tends to prevail in a low EPU period for all classes of assets. Importantly, the findings indicate that Bitcoin offers short-term diversification for sustainable and Islamic equity as well as energy stocks during a low uncertainty period. Consequently, in relation to the policy uncertainty, Bitcoin provides similar hedging opportunities than commodities like Gold and Silver. Overall, the study shows that EPU is remarkably important in explaining the average portfolio returns of Bitcoin, suggesting that this indicator can be perceived as a decent explanatory factor for portfolio diversification. Originality/value The study significantly extends the empirical literature of Bitcoin’s portfolio diversification by taking EPU into consideration. To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is one of the few studies to investigate the asymmetric effects of US EPU on Bitcoin’s hedging capabilities by taking into account major conventional equity, sustainable equity, Islamic equity, gold, silver and oil.
经济政策不确定性对比特币对冲能力的不对称影响
目的尽管比特币在文献中经常被称为避险资产类别,但经济政策的不确定性(EPU)对比特币相对于其他资产提供的多样化机会的影响仍有待研究。本文旨在研究EPU如何影响商品、传统、伊斯兰和可持续股权回报的多样化及其对比特币回报的影响。设计/方法论/方法作者使用先进的时间序列计量经济学,即多元广义自回归条件异方差动态条件相关和连续小波变换,对2011年8月1日至2019年9月1日期间上述资产的日收益进行分析,作者们发现了一个强有力的证据,表明比特币的平均值在长期内呈回归趋势,而其波动性自2013年以来大幅下降。在将EPU分为两种制度(高和低)后,比特币的多元化机会似乎在高EPU时期消失,而对冲机会往往在低EPU时期占主导地位,适用于所有类别的资产。重要的是,研究结果表明,比特币在低不确定性时期为可持续和伊斯兰股票以及能源股提供了短期多元化。因此,就政策的不确定性而言,比特币提供了与黄金和白银等大宗商品类似的对冲机会。总体而言,该研究表明,EPU在解释比特币的平均投资组合回报方面非常重要,这表明该指标可以被视为投资组合多元化的一个不错的解释因素。独创性/价值该研究通过考虑EPU,极大地扩展了比特币投资组合多元化的实证文献。据作者所知,这是为数不多的研究之一,通过考虑主要的传统股权、可持续股权、伊斯兰股权、黄金、白银和石油,来调查美国EPU对比特币对冲能力的不对称影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Topics addressed in the journal include: ■corporate finance, ■financial markets, ■money and banking, ■international finance and economics, ■investments, ■risk management, ■theory of the firm, ■competition policy, ■corporate governance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信