Retrospective Study of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Advanced/Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Lenvatinib/Everolimus after Heavy Pretreatment1

IF 1.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Kidney Cancer Pub Date : 2021-09-18 DOI:10.3233/kca-210127
N. Vogelzang, A. Monnette, Yunfei Wang, Y. Wan, N. Robert, N. Tannir
{"title":"Retrospective Study of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Advanced/Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Lenvatinib/Everolimus after Heavy Pretreatment1","authors":"N. Vogelzang, A. Monnette, Yunfei Wang, Y. Wan, N. Robert, N. Tannir","doi":"10.3233/kca-210127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib with everolimus (“Len/Eve”) is approved for advanced/metastatic RCC following one antiangiogenic therapy. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated patient characteristics, treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) with second-line or later (2L+) Len/Eve for advanced/metastatic RCC. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted using electronic health records. Adult patients who initiated 2L+ Len/Eve for advanced/metastatic RCC from May 13, 2016 to July 31, 2019 were included. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns were assessed across the overall population and by post-immuno-oncology (IO) and post-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) groups. OS was estimated from Len/Eve initiation (i.e., index date) using Kaplan-Meier. RESULTS: Among the study population (n = 152), 44.1%received 2L/3L Len/Eve and median number of prior therapies was 3 (range:1–8). Median age was 63.2 years, 78.9%were Caucasian, 73.7%were male, and 56.6%had ECOG performance status 0/1. At initial diagnosis, 65.8%had stage IV disease. At index, 53.3%had an International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk score of intermediate/poor, 15.1%favorable, and 31.6%missing score. Sixty-five (42.8%) received IO-based regimens and 49.3%received TKIs directly before index. Median OS from index was 13.9 (95%CI: 9.5–16.5) months and 2L/3L and 4L+ were 12.1 (95%CI: 8.4–17.0) and 14.8 (95%CI: 8.9–22.5) months, respectively. Median OS for Len/Eve post-IO and post-TKI were 13.9 (95%CI: 8.4–21.3) and 14.8 (95%CI: 7.8–16.5) months, respectively. Conclusion: This study suggested that 2L+ Len/Eve has clinical effectiveness for advanced/metastatic RCC in a US community oncology setting. Future studies are needed to confirm the association of improved survival with 2L+ Len/Eve.","PeriodicalId":17823,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/kca-210127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib with everolimus (“Len/Eve”) is approved for advanced/metastatic RCC following one antiangiogenic therapy. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated patient characteristics, treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) with second-line or later (2L+) Len/Eve for advanced/metastatic RCC. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted using electronic health records. Adult patients who initiated 2L+ Len/Eve for advanced/metastatic RCC from May 13, 2016 to July 31, 2019 were included. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns were assessed across the overall population and by post-immuno-oncology (IO) and post-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) groups. OS was estimated from Len/Eve initiation (i.e., index date) using Kaplan-Meier. RESULTS: Among the study population (n = 152), 44.1%received 2L/3L Len/Eve and median number of prior therapies was 3 (range:1–8). Median age was 63.2 years, 78.9%were Caucasian, 73.7%were male, and 56.6%had ECOG performance status 0/1. At initial diagnosis, 65.8%had stage IV disease. At index, 53.3%had an International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk score of intermediate/poor, 15.1%favorable, and 31.6%missing score. Sixty-five (42.8%) received IO-based regimens and 49.3%received TKIs directly before index. Median OS from index was 13.9 (95%CI: 9.5–16.5) months and 2L/3L and 4L+ were 12.1 (95%CI: 8.4–17.0) and 14.8 (95%CI: 8.9–22.5) months, respectively. Median OS for Len/Eve post-IO and post-TKI were 13.9 (95%CI: 8.4–21.3) and 14.8 (95%CI: 7.8–16.5) months, respectively. Conclusion: This study suggested that 2L+ Len/Eve has clinical effectiveness for advanced/metastatic RCC in a US community oncology setting. Future studies are needed to confirm the association of improved survival with 2L+ Len/Eve.
重度预处理后接受Lenvatinib/依维莫司治疗的晚期/转移性肾癌患者的现实世界治疗模式和结果的回顾性研究
背景:Lenvatinib联合依维莫司(“Len/Eve”)在一次抗血管生成治疗后被批准用于晚期/转移性RCC。目的:本研究评估了晚期/转移性RCC的患者特征、治疗模式和二线或二线以上(2L+) Len/Eve治疗的总生存期(OS)。方法:采用电子健康记录进行回顾性观察性研究。纳入了2016年5月13日至2019年7月31日期间接受2L+ Len/Eve治疗晚期/转移性RCC的成年患者。通过免疫肿瘤学(IO)和酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)组对整个人群的患者特征和治疗模式进行评估。使用Kaplan-Meier从Len/Eve起始(即索引日期)估计OS。结果:在研究人群(n = 152)中,44.1%的患者接受了2L/3L Len/Eve治疗,既往治疗中位数为3次(范围:1-8次)。中位年龄为63.2岁,78.9%为白种人,73.7%为男性,56.6%为ECOG表现状态0/1。初次诊断时,65.8%为IV期。在指数中,53.3%的人具有国际转移性RCC数据库联盟的风险评分为中/差,15.1%的人有利,31.6%的人没有得分。65例(42.8%)接受了基于io的方案,49.3%的患者在指数前直接接受了tki。指数的中位OS为13.9 (95%CI: 9.5-16.5)个月,2L/3L和4L+分别为12.1 (95%CI: 8.4-17.0)和14.8 (95%CI: 8.9-22.5)个月。Len/Eve术后io和术后tki的中位OS分别为13.9个月(95%CI: 8.4-21.3)和14.8个月(95%CI: 7.8-16.5)。结论:该研究表明,在美国社区肿瘤环境中,2L+ Len/Eve对晚期/转移性RCC具有临床疗效。需要进一步的研究来证实2L+ Len/Eve与改善生存的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney Cancer
Kidney Cancer Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信