comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity and surface tension of a combination of herbal extracts in different ratios: An in vitro study

S. Belsare, Alok Patel, Shweta S. Jajoo, Chetana Jagtap, Sneha P. Desai, Preetam P Shah
{"title":"comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity and surface tension of a combination of herbal extracts in different ratios: An in vitro study","authors":"S. Belsare, Alok Patel, Shweta S. Jajoo, Chetana Jagtap, Sneha P. Desai, Preetam P Shah","doi":"10.4103/jdrr.jdrr_110_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this research was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity and surface tension of a combination of herbal extracts and compare them with the gold standard in irrigating solutions that is sodium hypochlorite. Methodology: A combination of lime peel and reetha extract and ashwagandha and triphala extract was prepared in the ratio of 1:1 and 2:1, and the antimicrobial activity of all the four groups was evaluated against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. The microbial testing was done using the standard protocols for testing the zone of inhibition. The surface tensions of the prepared solutions were also evaluated using a tensiometer. The gold standard in irrigating solutions, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, was used as the positive control. Results: Results from the study showed that all the four solutions had antimicrobial activity, however, it was significantly lower than the control group. Intergroup comparison using one-way ANOVA within the groups showed a significant difference between the zone of inhibition of the solutions against E. faecalis and C. albicans with P = 0.001. Post hoc Tukey's test was applied to the results, and the groups showed a significant difference with the positive control. Within the groups, a significant difference was seen, indicating that there were differences between the zone of inhibition due to the separate solutions. The surface tension which gives an idea of the surface wetting capacity of the irrigating solution was better in the test groups. It was highest (67.94 dynes/cm) for the positive control that is NaOCl which signifies a lower surface wetting capacity. Conclusion: It was seen that the herbal ingredients did show antimicrobial activity, however, it was not as good as the gold standard NaOCl. The test groups, however, had a lower surface tension as compared to the control group which implies a better surface wetting capacity and a better ability of the solutions to reach the uninstrumented areas.","PeriodicalId":31325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research and Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"272 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jdrr.jdrr_110_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this research was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity and surface tension of a combination of herbal extracts and compare them with the gold standard in irrigating solutions that is sodium hypochlorite. Methodology: A combination of lime peel and reetha extract and ashwagandha and triphala extract was prepared in the ratio of 1:1 and 2:1, and the antimicrobial activity of all the four groups was evaluated against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. The microbial testing was done using the standard protocols for testing the zone of inhibition. The surface tensions of the prepared solutions were also evaluated using a tensiometer. The gold standard in irrigating solutions, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, was used as the positive control. Results: Results from the study showed that all the four solutions had antimicrobial activity, however, it was significantly lower than the control group. Intergroup comparison using one-way ANOVA within the groups showed a significant difference between the zone of inhibition of the solutions against E. faecalis and C. albicans with P = 0.001. Post hoc Tukey's test was applied to the results, and the groups showed a significant difference with the positive control. Within the groups, a significant difference was seen, indicating that there were differences between the zone of inhibition due to the separate solutions. The surface tension which gives an idea of the surface wetting capacity of the irrigating solution was better in the test groups. It was highest (67.94 dynes/cm) for the positive control that is NaOCl which signifies a lower surface wetting capacity. Conclusion: It was seen that the herbal ingredients did show antimicrobial activity, however, it was not as good as the gold standard NaOCl. The test groups, however, had a lower surface tension as compared to the control group which implies a better surface wetting capacity and a better ability of the solutions to reach the uninstrumented areas.
不同比例草药提取物组合的抗菌活性和表面张力的比较评价:一项体外研究
目的:本研究的目的是评价草药提取物组合的抗菌活性和表面张力,并将其与次氯酸钠冲洗液的金标准进行比较。方法:分别以1:1和2:1的比例配制青柠皮和芦笋叶提取物、ashwagandha和tritria提取物的组合,比较四组对粪肠球菌和白色念珠菌的抑菌活性。微生物试验采用标准的抑制区试验方案进行。制备的溶液的表面张力也用张力计进行了评估。以5.25%次氯酸钠灌洗液金标准为阳性对照。结果:研究结果表明,四种溶液均具有抗菌活性,但明显低于对照组。组间单因素方差分析显示,两种溶液对粪肠杆菌和白色念珠菌的抑制区差异显著(P = 0.001)。对结果进行事后Tukey检验,两组与阳性对照有显著性差异。在组内,可以看到显著的差异,这表明由于不同的溶液,抑制区之间存在差异。试验组的表面张力较好,反映了灌溉液的表面润湿能力。阳性对照NaOCl的表面润湿能力最高(67.94 dynes/cm),表明其表面润湿能力较低。结论:中药成分具有一定的抑菌活性,但其抑菌效果不如金标准NaOCl。然而,与对照组相比,试验组具有较低的表面张力,这意味着更好的表面润湿能力和溶液到达未检测区域的更好能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书