Shaping the prospects for adequate pensions: the effect of policy guidelines under the European Semester

IF 1.8 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Igor Tkalec
{"title":"Shaping the prospects for adequate pensions: the effect of policy guidelines under the European Semester","authors":"Igor Tkalec","doi":"10.1080/2474736x.2020.1738898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper depicts the relationship between the EU and pensions by demonstrating the EU’s indirect pressure on pensions – spill-over from the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) – reflected through economic and fiscal policy coordination mechanism. Concretely, the paper examines how compliance with the fiscal and economic policy guidelines deriving from the European Semester shape prospects for pension adequacy in the euro area countries. Pension adequacy is understood as the ratio of available income in retirement relative to available income during employment. The results point to three empirically relevant economic-fiscal policy models/configurations under which adequate pensions are observed. The models are not universally based on compliance with the policy guidelines under the Semester and they differ in terms of the type of policy which is potentially conducive for adequate pensions. Diversity of the models thus implies that compliance with the guidelines works for some euro area countries whilst for others it does not. Consequently, the shaping prospects or the safeguarding capacity of the Semester’s policy guidelines in terms of adequate pensions are modest. The main method used in the paper is fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA).","PeriodicalId":20269,"journal":{"name":"Political Research Exchange","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2474736x.2020.1738898","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Research Exchange","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736x.2020.1738898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper depicts the relationship between the EU and pensions by demonstrating the EU’s indirect pressure on pensions – spill-over from the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) – reflected through economic and fiscal policy coordination mechanism. Concretely, the paper examines how compliance with the fiscal and economic policy guidelines deriving from the European Semester shape prospects for pension adequacy in the euro area countries. Pension adequacy is understood as the ratio of available income in retirement relative to available income during employment. The results point to three empirically relevant economic-fiscal policy models/configurations under which adequate pensions are observed. The models are not universally based on compliance with the policy guidelines under the Semester and they differ in terms of the type of policy which is potentially conducive for adequate pensions. Diversity of the models thus implies that compliance with the guidelines works for some euro area countries whilst for others it does not. Consequently, the shaping prospects or the safeguarding capacity of the Semester’s policy guidelines in terms of adequate pensions are modest. The main method used in the paper is fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA).
塑造充足养老金的前景:欧洲学期政策指导方针的影响
本文通过论证欧盟对养老金的间接压力——经济与货币联盟(EMU)的溢出效应——通过经济和财政政策协调机制反映出来,描述了欧盟与养老金之间的关系。具体而言,本文考察了遵守欧洲学期衍生的财政和经济政策指导方针如何影响欧元区国家养老金充足性的前景。养恤金充足性被理解为退休时可用收入与在职期间可用收入的比率。结果指出了三种经验相关的经济财政政策模型/配置,在这些模型/配置下可以观察到足够的养老金。这些模式并非普遍以遵守本学期的政策指导方针为基础,它们在可能有助于获得足够养恤金的政策类型方面有所不同。因此,模型的多样性意味着,遵守指导方针对一些欧元区国家有效,而对另一些国家则不然。因此,本学期在适当养恤金方面的政策指导方针的形成前景或保障能力是有限的。本文采用的主要方法是模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Political Research Exchange
Political Research Exchange POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信