Genealogy, Terrorism, and the "Relays" of Thought

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Sarah K. Hansen
{"title":"Genealogy, Terrorism, and the \"Relays\" of Thought","authors":"Sarah K. Hansen","doi":"10.22439/FS.V1I28.6070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Verena Erlenbusch-Anderson’s Genealogies of Terrorism is an attempt to “loosen the grip of habitual frameworks of thought” vis-a-vis terrorism and genealogy.1 In the aftermath of so many violent events in our world, debates about the meaning of terrorism follow predictable arcs and strategies. Generally, we think that we know terrorism when we see it, or, if there is confusion, we think that we can define terrorism via descriptive, classificatory, or normative analyses. However, “unquestioned and implicit assumptions about what we already recognize as terrorism” shape our perceptions and definitions.2 To navigate this impasse, Erlenbusch-Anderson uses Foucault’s method of genealogy to excavate the material and discursive conditions of terrorism and to contextualize different modes of understanding it today. In the process, she also disrupts some habitual patterns of genealogical thought, especially the tendency to mobilize genealogies toward normative ends. Very often, normative theorists treat genealogies as the material on which they work, abstracting the theorist from their discursive and material conditions and implying a distinction between theory and practice. Erlenbusch-Anderson concludes Genealogies of Terrorism by considering how theory can serve “as a relay among a plurality of concrete practices of resistance and transformation.”3 What it means to be a “relay” is a fascinating question in Genealogies of Terrorism. How should genealogists avoid foisting prescriptive or speculative theories on others? How should genealogists “derive norms from the practices of those who are fighting”?4 In loosening the rigidity of our thought, Erlenbusch-Anderson spurs the multiplication of alternative archives and genealogies. Through what relays do these genealogies promise “alternative futures [...] for those of us who [...] look for new ways of thinking and knowing”?5 Erlenbusch-Anderson’s genealogy focuses on a French lineage of the concept of terrorism, beginning with its emergence during the French Revolution. Challenging the","PeriodicalId":38873,"journal":{"name":"Foucault Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"10-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foucault Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22439/FS.V1I28.6070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Verena Erlenbusch-Anderson’s Genealogies of Terrorism is an attempt to “loosen the grip of habitual frameworks of thought” vis-a-vis terrorism and genealogy.1 In the aftermath of so many violent events in our world, debates about the meaning of terrorism follow predictable arcs and strategies. Generally, we think that we know terrorism when we see it, or, if there is confusion, we think that we can define terrorism via descriptive, classificatory, or normative analyses. However, “unquestioned and implicit assumptions about what we already recognize as terrorism” shape our perceptions and definitions.2 To navigate this impasse, Erlenbusch-Anderson uses Foucault’s method of genealogy to excavate the material and discursive conditions of terrorism and to contextualize different modes of understanding it today. In the process, she also disrupts some habitual patterns of genealogical thought, especially the tendency to mobilize genealogies toward normative ends. Very often, normative theorists treat genealogies as the material on which they work, abstracting the theorist from their discursive and material conditions and implying a distinction between theory and practice. Erlenbusch-Anderson concludes Genealogies of Terrorism by considering how theory can serve “as a relay among a plurality of concrete practices of resistance and transformation.”3 What it means to be a “relay” is a fascinating question in Genealogies of Terrorism. How should genealogists avoid foisting prescriptive or speculative theories on others? How should genealogists “derive norms from the practices of those who are fighting”?4 In loosening the rigidity of our thought, Erlenbusch-Anderson spurs the multiplication of alternative archives and genealogies. Through what relays do these genealogies promise “alternative futures [...] for those of us who [...] look for new ways of thinking and knowing”?5 Erlenbusch-Anderson’s genealogy focuses on a French lineage of the concept of terrorism, beginning with its emergence during the French Revolution. Challenging the
宗谱、恐怖主义和思想的“传递”
Verena Erlenbusch Anderson的《恐怖主义谱系》试图“放松对恐怖主义和谱系的习惯性思维框架的控制”。1在我们世界上发生了如此多的暴力事件之后,关于恐怖主义含义的辩论遵循了可预测的弧线和策略。一般来说,当我们看到恐怖主义时,我们认为我们知道它,或者,如果存在混淆,我们认为可以通过描述性、分类或规范性分析来定义恐怖主义。然而,“对我们已经认识到的恐怖主义的毫无疑问和隐含的假设”塑造了我们的看法和定义。2为了克服这一僵局,Erlenbusch Anderson使用福柯的谱系学方法来挖掘恐怖主义的物质和话语条件,并将当今理解恐怖主义的不同模式置于背景中。在这个过程中,她还颠覆了系谱思想的一些习惯模式,尤其是将系谱推向规范目的的倾向。通常,规范理论家将系谱视为他们工作的材料,将理论家从他们的话语和物质条件中抽象出来,并暗示理论和实践之间的区别。Erlenbusch-Anderson在总结《恐怖主义谱系》时考虑了理论如何“在多种具体的抵抗和变革实践中充当中继”。家谱学家应该如何避免将规定性或推测性的理论强加于他人?家谱学家应该如何“从那些正在战斗的人的实践中获得规范”?4在放松我们僵化的思想的过程中,Erlenbusch Anderson刺激了替代档案和家谱的增加。这些家谱通过什么样的中继承诺“为我们这些寻找新的思考和认识方式的人提供替代的未来”?5 Erlenbusch-Anderson的家谱关注的是恐怖主义概念的法国血统,始于法国大革命期间。挑战
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foucault Studies
Foucault Studies Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信