Alcance y límites del principio de jerarquía. Criterios para jerarquizar derechos, valores, bienes y otros elementos

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
J. Riofrio
{"title":"Alcance y límites del principio de jerarquía. Criterios para jerarquizar derechos, valores, bienes y otros elementos","authors":"J. Riofrio","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.202001.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of this research is to show the true dimension of the hierarchy principle, its scope and its limits. The goal is to overcome the normative vision of this principle, observing how it operates in other juridical elements, as charges, ends, values, goods, principles and rights. A philosophical, speculative and abstract method is used, endorsed with examples from the law of several nations and the international law. As the greatest debate in this field is the hierarchy of rights, viewed skeptically by a big part of the doctrine, this paper focuses on seeing how the hierarchy might work there. The analysis has a tripartite structure: a) exposition of the problem, b) exposition of notions, and c) resolution of the problem using the provided notions. In the first comprises the hierarchy principle, its positive and negative functions, and its conditions and limits, defining the possible hierarchical criteria. Finally, in the last sections, it’s checked whether the mentioned notions and criteria are applicable to the problem of rights and to other elements. After checking it the conclusions are presented.sections the arguments for and against the hierarchy of rights are exposed, andis shown where the problem of hierarchization lies. Then, it’s explained what","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derecho PUCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The main aim of this research is to show the true dimension of the hierarchy principle, its scope and its limits. The goal is to overcome the normative vision of this principle, observing how it operates in other juridical elements, as charges, ends, values, goods, principles and rights. A philosophical, speculative and abstract method is used, endorsed with examples from the law of several nations and the international law. As the greatest debate in this field is the hierarchy of rights, viewed skeptically by a big part of the doctrine, this paper focuses on seeing how the hierarchy might work there. The analysis has a tripartite structure: a) exposition of the problem, b) exposition of notions, and c) resolution of the problem using the provided notions. In the first comprises the hierarchy principle, its positive and negative functions, and its conditions and limits, defining the possible hierarchical criteria. Finally, in the last sections, it’s checked whether the mentioned notions and criteria are applicable to the problem of rights and to other elements. After checking it the conclusions are presented.sections the arguments for and against the hierarchy of rights are exposed, andis shown where the problem of hierarchization lies. Then, it’s explained what
等级原则的范围和限制。权利、价值、商品和其他要素的分级标准
本研究的主要目的是揭示层次原则的真实维度、范围和局限。我们的目标是克服对这一原则的规范性看法,观察它如何在其他司法要素中发挥作用,如指控、目的、价值、利益、原则和权利。采用了一种哲学的、思辨的和抽象的方法,并以若干国家的法律和国际法为例加以赞同。由于这一领域最大的争论是权利的等级制度,这一理论的大部分人都持怀疑态度,本文的重点是看看等级制度在那里是如何运作的。分析有三个部分的结构:a)问题的阐述,b)概念的阐述,c)使用提供的概念来解决问题。第一部分包括层次原则,它的积极和消极作用,以及它的条件和限制,界定了可能的层次标准。最后,在最后几节中,检验上述概念和标准是否适用于权利问题和其他要素。在对其进行检验后,提出了结论。章节揭示了支持和反对权利层次结构的论据,并显示了层次结构的问题所在。然后,它解释了什么
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信