Exploring the possibilities and challenges in developing the Japanese qualifications framework

Ayaka Noda
{"title":"Exploring the possibilities and challenges in developing the Japanese qualifications framework","authors":"Ayaka Noda","doi":"10.1108/heed-05-2022-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to examine the rationales for and obstacles to developing a national qualifications framework (NQF) in Japan. From a research perspective, it attempts to propose a model of a qualifications framework in the national context to provoke further political discussion in developing the Japanese Qualifications Framework (JQF).Design/methodology/approachTo propose a possible model of a qualifications framework in the Japanese context, this study employs a qualitative document analysis approach to known NQFs. Next, based on documents and the literature, including government data and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s Tokyo Convention (2011a, b), this study analyzes the motives and challenges in developing the JQF.FindingsJapanese motives to develop the JQF can be summarized in four conditions: (a) International expectations along with the Tokyo Convention and establishment of the National Information Center, (b) avoiding qualification holders’ disadvantages in mobility, (c) quality assurance of qualifications with a competence-based approach and (d) lifelong learning by promoting recognition of diverse learning. The challenges in developing the JQF are (a) fitness with the traditional employment system and (b) multiple stakeholders’ involvement. The current priority in developing an NQF in Japan is to make educational qualification information “visible” based on legal grounds, particularly entrance requirements, to facilitate mobility.Originality/valueThis study explores the possibility of the JQF by summarizing the background and roles of NQFs worldwide and clarifying the motives and challenges for developing the JQF. This study provides suggestions for the possible qualifications framework model in the Japanese context from academic and practical perspectives in Japan, where official discussions on establishing an NQF have not progressed. Ensuring the international compatibility of qualifications so that qualification holders can smoothly take the next step in their studies and employment is important.","PeriodicalId":32842,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Evaluation and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Evaluation and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/heed-05-2022-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to examine the rationales for and obstacles to developing a national qualifications framework (NQF) in Japan. From a research perspective, it attempts to propose a model of a qualifications framework in the national context to provoke further political discussion in developing the Japanese Qualifications Framework (JQF).Design/methodology/approachTo propose a possible model of a qualifications framework in the Japanese context, this study employs a qualitative document analysis approach to known NQFs. Next, based on documents and the literature, including government data and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s Tokyo Convention (2011a, b), this study analyzes the motives and challenges in developing the JQF.FindingsJapanese motives to develop the JQF can be summarized in four conditions: (a) International expectations along with the Tokyo Convention and establishment of the National Information Center, (b) avoiding qualification holders’ disadvantages in mobility, (c) quality assurance of qualifications with a competence-based approach and (d) lifelong learning by promoting recognition of diverse learning. The challenges in developing the JQF are (a) fitness with the traditional employment system and (b) multiple stakeholders’ involvement. The current priority in developing an NQF in Japan is to make educational qualification information “visible” based on legal grounds, particularly entrance requirements, to facilitate mobility.Originality/valueThis study explores the possibility of the JQF by summarizing the background and roles of NQFs worldwide and clarifying the motives and challenges for developing the JQF. This study provides suggestions for the possible qualifications framework model in the Japanese context from academic and practical perspectives in Japan, where official discussions on establishing an NQF have not progressed. Ensuring the international compatibility of qualifications so that qualification holders can smoothly take the next step in their studies and employment is important.
探讨发展日本资历架构的可能性和挑战
目的本研究旨在探讨在日本制定国家资格框架(NQF)的理由和障碍。从研究的角度来看,它试图在国家背景下提出一个资格框架的模型,以在制定日本资格框架(JQF)时引发进一步的政治讨论。设计/方法论/方法为了在日本背景下提出资格框架的可能模型,本研究对已知的NQF采用了定性文件分析方法。接下来,根据文件和文献,包括政府数据和联合国教育、科学及文化组织的《东京公约》(2011a,b),本研究分析了日本发展JQF的动机和挑战。日本发展JQF的动机可以概括为四个条件:(a)国际社会对东京会议和国家信息中心的期望,(b)避免资格持有者在流动性方面的劣势,(c)以能力为本的方式保证学历的质量;(d)通过促进对多样化学习的认可来实现终身学习。发展JQF的挑战是(a)适应传统的就业制度和(b)多个利益相关者的参与。目前,在日本开发NQF的首要任务是根据法律依据,特别是入学要求,使学历信息“可见”,以促进流动性。独创性/价值本研究通过总结NQF在世界范围内的背景和作用,并阐明发展JQF的动机和挑战,探索JQF存在的可能性。本研究从日本的学术和实践角度为日本背景下可能的资格框架模式提供了建议,在日本,关于建立NQF的官方讨论尚未取得进展。确保学历的国际兼容性,使学历持有者能够顺利地在学习和就业方面迈出下一步,这一点很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信