Evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index score in brackets bonded with probiotics impregnated orthodontic adhesive and commercially available orthodontic adhesive - An in vitro study

IF 0.1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Azmina Idaayath, Poornima Jnaneshwar, R. Krishnaraj, K.Ravi
{"title":"Evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index score in brackets bonded with probiotics impregnated orthodontic adhesive and commercially available orthodontic adhesive - An in vitro study","authors":"Azmina Idaayath, Poornima Jnaneshwar, R. Krishnaraj, K.Ravi","doi":"10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v14i1.696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nBackground: White spot lesions are one of the main drawbacks of fixed orthodontic mechanotherapy. Probiotic bacteria have been included in mouthwashes and lozenges to check the activity of S.mutans on surface enamel. \nAim: Aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index scores of orthodontic brackets bonded with probiotic impregnated (Lactobacillus rhamnous) orthodontic adhesive and conventional light cure orthodontic adhesive. \nMaterials and methods: In this in-vitro study, two groups were tested in one group brackets were bonded to extracted maxillary premolars using probiotic impregnated composite and in the other with conventional light cure composite resin. Shear bond strength was assessed using universal testing machine. Adhesive remnant index scores were assessed on the same samples.\nResults: Shear bond strength of the new composite resin was significantly decreased when compared to conventional light cure composite (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in ARI scores (p=0.51) between the groups. \nConclusions: The shear bond strength of the novel probiotic impregnated composite was significantly reduced. Though there was no significant variation in ARI scores when compared to control, avenues to improve the shear bond strength should be assessed.\n","PeriodicalId":29888,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v14i1.696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: White spot lesions are one of the main drawbacks of fixed orthodontic mechanotherapy. Probiotic bacteria have been included in mouthwashes and lozenges to check the activity of S.mutans on surface enamel. Aim: Aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index scores of orthodontic brackets bonded with probiotic impregnated (Lactobacillus rhamnous) orthodontic adhesive and conventional light cure orthodontic adhesive.  Materials and methods: In this in-vitro study, two groups were tested in one group brackets were bonded to extracted maxillary premolars using probiotic impregnated composite and in the other with conventional light cure composite resin. Shear bond strength was assessed using universal testing machine. Adhesive remnant index scores were assessed on the same samples. Results: Shear bond strength of the new composite resin was significantly decreased when compared to conventional light cure composite (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in ARI scores (p=0.51) between the groups.  Conclusions: The shear bond strength of the novel probiotic impregnated composite was significantly reduced. Though there was no significant variation in ARI scores when compared to control, avenues to improve the shear bond strength should be assessed.
益生菌口腔正畸粘合剂和市售口腔正畸粘合剂粘接托槽的剪切粘接强度和残留指数的评价与比较——体外研究
背景:白斑病变是固定正畸机械治疗的主要缺点之一。漱口水和含片中含有益生菌,以检查变形链球菌对牙釉质表面的活性。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较益生菌浸渍(鼠李糖乳杆菌)正畸粘合剂和传统光固化正畸粘合剂粘合的正畸托槽的剪切粘合强度和粘合剂残留指数得分。材料和方法:在这项体外研究中,对两组进行了测试,一组使用益生菌浸渍复合材料将托槽与提取的上颌前磨牙结合,另一组使用传统的光固化复合树脂。剪切结合强度使用通用试验机进行评估。在相同的样品上评估粘合剂残留指数得分。结果:与传统的光固化复合材料相比,新型复合树脂的剪切结合强度显著降低(p=0.001)。两组之间的ARI评分没有显著差异(p=0.051)。结论:新型益生菌浸渍复合材料的剪切结合强度显著降低。尽管与对照组相比,ARI评分没有显著变化,但应评估提高剪切粘结强度的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation
International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信