FINAL INVESTMENT DECISION (FID) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN OIL & GAS MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT. CASE STUDY OF PT. VUL’S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

M. Wibisono, U. Putro
{"title":"FINAL INVESTMENT DECISION (FID) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN OIL & GAS MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT. CASE STUDY OF PT. VUL’S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS","authors":"M. Wibisono, U. Putro","doi":"10.21776/ub.jemis.2022.010.01.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uncertainties from many factors, oil price, production, execution and operational risks, external factors, are issues that impact project profitability. For major capital projects (MCPs), with magnitude of investment well into hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, a robust, structured rational process is required to minimize uncertainties and provide all the required information for a decision maker to make a high-quality, measured decision in continuing with execution of the project. Semi-structured interview for projects with CAPEX valued around $500 million, and above $10 billion were performed; coupled with comparison between appropriation and actual results, and literature reviews to uncover the complexities, experienced issues that happened in the process. Process and bias analysis were performed to provide solution. Reviews were made on Decision Executive (DE)/Decision Review Board (DRB) effectiveness, market price intelligence, high-grading or project sequencing options, external alignment, optimum time period of investment, biases encountered and how to mitigate them. To mitigate above identified issues, inclusion of mitigation in the FID process, through DE/DRB alignment, project sequencing, market condition scenarios, technology maturity review, debiasing methods, external stakeholder engagement, and optimize time to FID, including transformation and implementation process is presented as part of the study’s conclusion.","PeriodicalId":31715,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Management in Industrial System","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Management in Industrial System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jemis.2022.010.01.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Uncertainties from many factors, oil price, production, execution and operational risks, external factors, are issues that impact project profitability. For major capital projects (MCPs), with magnitude of investment well into hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, a robust, structured rational process is required to minimize uncertainties and provide all the required information for a decision maker to make a high-quality, measured decision in continuing with execution of the project. Semi-structured interview for projects with CAPEX valued around $500 million, and above $10 billion were performed; coupled with comparison between appropriation and actual results, and literature reviews to uncover the complexities, experienced issues that happened in the process. Process and bias analysis were performed to provide solution. Reviews were made on Decision Executive (DE)/Decision Review Board (DRB) effectiveness, market price intelligence, high-grading or project sequencing options, external alignment, optimum time period of investment, biases encountered and how to mitigate them. To mitigate above identified issues, inclusion of mitigation in the FID process, through DE/DRB alignment, project sequencing, market condition scenarios, technology maturity review, debiasing methods, external stakeholder engagement, and optimize time to FID, including transformation and implementation process is presented as part of the study’s conclusion.
油气重大投资项目的最终投资决策(fid)流程改进。vul公司决策过程的案例研究
来自许多因素的不确定性,如油价、生产、执行和运营风险、外部因素,都是影响项目盈利能力的问题。对于投资规模高达数亿或数十亿美元的重大资本项目,需要一个稳健、结构化的合理流程,以最大限度地减少不确定性,并为决策者提供所有必要的信息,以便在继续执行项目时做出高质量、有分寸的决策。对资本支出约为5亿美元、超过100亿美元的项目进行了半结构化访谈;再加上拨款与实际结果之间的比较,以及文献综述,以揭示过程中发生的复杂性、经验问题。进行工艺和偏差分析以提供解决方案。对决策执行官(DE)/决策审查委员会(DRB)的有效性、市场价格情报、高评级或项目排序选项、外部调整、最佳投资时间段、遇到的偏差以及如何缓解这些偏差进行了审查。为了缓解上述问题,将缓解措施纳入FID过程,通过DE/DRB调整、项目排序、市场条件情景、技术成熟度审查、去偏倚方法、外部利益相关者参与和优化FID时间,包括转型和实施过程,作为研究结论的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信