Searching for ‘Deeper Magic’; A Comparative Exercise in Children’s Homes Using a System Analysis

Q2 Social Sciences
Kevin D. Ball
{"title":"Searching for ‘Deeper Magic’; A Comparative Exercise in Children’s Homes Using a System Analysis","authors":"Kevin D. Ball","doi":"10.1080/09503153.2022.2155945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Those responsible for placing highly vulnerable children in regulated Children’s Homes need to ensure the Home can meet the child’s needs. Assessing suitability to meet a child’s needs is often benchmarked against findings and judgements awarded by Ofsted and which are established on regulatory requirements and quality standards. For those Homes that may struggle to raise standards, this paper explores the use of an additional management instrument that can identify and target areas for change and improvement; through the use of a diagnostic model that identifies key factors in organisational change. By reviewing and comparing six Homes in England – three judged as ‘requiring improvement’ and three judged ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted, the review found that both qualitative transformational and transactional features can be critical in the successful performance in a Home. Features such as the consistency and ambitions of the leadership, the pace of staff changes, culture and attitudes being carried through by staff and children are all critical factors. Being alert to different ways of viewing quality and performance may allow placing authorities and Social Workers another tool to discuss effectiveness when making decisions about placing a child.","PeriodicalId":35184,"journal":{"name":"Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2022.2155945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Those responsible for placing highly vulnerable children in regulated Children’s Homes need to ensure the Home can meet the child’s needs. Assessing suitability to meet a child’s needs is often benchmarked against findings and judgements awarded by Ofsted and which are established on regulatory requirements and quality standards. For those Homes that may struggle to raise standards, this paper explores the use of an additional management instrument that can identify and target areas for change and improvement; through the use of a diagnostic model that identifies key factors in organisational change. By reviewing and comparing six Homes in England – three judged as ‘requiring improvement’ and three judged ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted, the review found that both qualitative transformational and transactional features can be critical in the successful performance in a Home. Features such as the consistency and ambitions of the leadership, the pace of staff changes, culture and attitudes being carried through by staff and children are all critical factors. Being alert to different ways of viewing quality and performance may allow placing authorities and Social Workers another tool to discuss effectiveness when making decisions about placing a child.
寻找“更深层的魔法”;基于系统分析的儿童家庭比较练习
负责将高度脆弱的儿童安置在受监管的儿童之家的人需要确保儿童之家能够满足儿童的需求。评估是否适合满足儿童需求通常以英国教育标准局的调查结果和判断为基准,这些调查结果和评判是根据监管要求和质量标准制定的。对于那些可能难以提高标准的家庭,本文探讨了使用一种额外的管理工具,该工具可以确定并针对需要改变和改进的领域;通过使用诊断模型来识别组织变革中的关键因素。通过审查和比较英国的六所住宅——其中三所被英国教育标准局判定为“需要改进”,三所被Ofsted判定为“杰出”,审查发现,质量转型和交易特征对住宅的成功表现至关重要。领导层的一致性和雄心、工作人员变动的速度、工作人员和儿童的文化和态度等特点都是关键因素。警惕不同的观看质量和表现的方式,可能会让安置当局和社会工作者在做出安置孩子的决定时,成为讨论有效性的另一个工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Practice
Practice Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信