T. Sugawara, H. Shinohara, S. Haruta, J. Shindo, M. Ueno, H. Udagawa
{"title":"Total Amylase Value in Drains After Gastrectomy for Predicting Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula","authors":"T. Sugawara, H. Shinohara, S. Haruta, J. Shindo, M. Ueno, H. Udagawa","doi":"10.9738/intsurg-d-17-00127.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is defined using the ratio of the bilirubin concentration in abdominal drainage fluid to the upper normal range of serum amylase level. However, we hypothesized that the total amylase value in discharge (AVD) on POD 3 may be more sensitive for predicting grade II or higher severe POPF sPOPF, and compared the predictive power of the conventional definition of POPF and AVD for sPOPF. Methods: One hundred and fifty-one patients who underwent gastrectomy between October 2011 and February 2013 were analyzed. A drainage tube was placed in all the cases through the stump of the right gastroepiploic vein and the front of the pancreas to the back of the anastomotic site. The drainage volume and amylase concentration in the discharge were examined on POD 1, 3, and 5. AVD was calculated by multiplying the volume by the amylase concentration. Results: Eight patients (5.3%) developed sPOPF. In univariate analysis, both AVD and the amylase concentration ratio was significantly correlated with sPOPF (P = 0.002 and 0.007, respectively). AVD on POD 3 showed the best predictive performance compared with the amylase concentration ratio on POD 3 (area under the curve 0.876 vs. 0.844). Based on the cutoff values calculated from the ROC curves, AVD was more specific than amylase concentration ratio in predicting sPOPF (specificity: 97.6% vs. 86.0%; PPV: 62.5% vs. 23.1%). Conclusion: AVD on POD 3 is a more specific parameter than conventional amylase concentration ratio in predicting sPOPF.","PeriodicalId":14474,"journal":{"name":"International surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-17-00127.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is defined using the ratio of the bilirubin concentration in abdominal drainage fluid to the upper normal range of serum amylase level. However, we hypothesized that the total amylase value in discharge (AVD) on POD 3 may be more sensitive for predicting grade II or higher severe POPF sPOPF, and compared the predictive power of the conventional definition of POPF and AVD for sPOPF. Methods: One hundred and fifty-one patients who underwent gastrectomy between October 2011 and February 2013 were analyzed. A drainage tube was placed in all the cases through the stump of the right gastroepiploic vein and the front of the pancreas to the back of the anastomotic site. The drainage volume and amylase concentration in the discharge were examined on POD 1, 3, and 5. AVD was calculated by multiplying the volume by the amylase concentration. Results: Eight patients (5.3%) developed sPOPF. In univariate analysis, both AVD and the amylase concentration ratio was significantly correlated with sPOPF (P = 0.002 and 0.007, respectively). AVD on POD 3 showed the best predictive performance compared with the amylase concentration ratio on POD 3 (area under the curve 0.876 vs. 0.844). Based on the cutoff values calculated from the ROC curves, AVD was more specific than amylase concentration ratio in predicting sPOPF (specificity: 97.6% vs. 86.0%; PPV: 62.5% vs. 23.1%). Conclusion: AVD on POD 3 is a more specific parameter than conventional amylase concentration ratio in predicting sPOPF.
期刊介绍:
International Surgery is the Official Journal of the International College of Surgeons. International Surgery has been published since 1938 and has an important position in the global scientific and medical publishing field.
The Journal publishes only open access manuscripts. Advantages and benefits of open access publishing in International Surgery include:
-worldwide internet transmission
-prompt peer reviews
-timely publishing following peer review approved manuscripts
-even more timely worldwide transmissions of unedited peer review approved manuscripts (“online first”) prior to having copy edited manuscripts formally published.
Non-approved peer reviewed manuscript authors have the opportunity to update and improve manuscripts prior to again submitting for peer review.