New Technologies Supporting the Shift to User-Led Approaches in Social Services: A Study of the Implementation of Baromètre

IF 1.5 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
S. Carrier, Opale Robichaud, Pierre-Luc Bossé, Alexandre Farrese, Annie Lambert
{"title":"New Technologies Supporting the Shift to User-Led Approaches in Social Services: A Study of the Implementation of Baromètre","authors":"S. Carrier, Opale Robichaud, Pierre-Luc Bossé, Alexandre Farrese, Annie Lambert","doi":"10.1080/15228835.2021.1980933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract User-led approaches are increasingly common in the field of social services and call for significant change in social service culture and practices. This research1 aims to study the implementation process of a new technology tool, Baromètre, as a socio-technical tool contributing to a culture shift in social services. We used a qualitative approach and a multiple case method in four implementation practice settings. We carried out individual interviews and focus group interviews with services users and professionals from which we reconstructed case histories. Using the convention theory and logics of action, we identified three types of social compromises that influence conditions of implementation: the inflexion compromise, the scheduling compromise, and the libertarian compromise. The results show us that the use of technology is relevant but cannot be the only vector of change in social work practices.","PeriodicalId":46115,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES","volume":"40 1","pages":"181 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2021.1980933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract User-led approaches are increasingly common in the field of social services and call for significant change in social service culture and practices. This research1 aims to study the implementation process of a new technology tool, Baromètre, as a socio-technical tool contributing to a culture shift in social services. We used a qualitative approach and a multiple case method in four implementation practice settings. We carried out individual interviews and focus group interviews with services users and professionals from which we reconstructed case histories. Using the convention theory and logics of action, we identified three types of social compromises that influence conditions of implementation: the inflexion compromise, the scheduling compromise, and the libertarian compromise. The results show us that the use of technology is relevant but cannot be the only vector of change in social work practices.
支持向用户主导的社会服务方法转变的新技术:对barom tre实施情况的研究
摘要用户主导的方法在社会服务领域越来越普遍,需要对社会服务文化和实践进行重大变革。本研究1旨在研究新技术工具Baromètre的实施过程,该工具是一种有助于社会服务文化转变的社会技术工具。我们在四个实施实践环境中使用了定性方法和多案例方法。我们对服务用户和专业人士进行了个人访谈和焦点小组访谈,从中重建了案例历史。运用惯例理论和行动逻辑,我们确定了影响实施条件的三种社会妥协类型:拐点妥协、日程安排妥协和自由意志主义妥协。研究结果表明,技术的使用是相关的,但不能成为社会工作实践变化的唯一载体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed, refereed journal explores the potentials of computer and telecommunications technologies in mental health, developmental disability, welfare, addictions, education, and other human services. The Journal of Technology in Human Services covers the full range of technological applications, including direct service techniques. It not only provides the necessary historical perspectives on the use of computers in the human service field, but it also presents articles that will improve your technology literacy and keep you abreast of state-of-the-art developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信