Blended Learning: Past and Present with Special Reference to COVID-19 Pandemic

Aisha Shams Akhunzada, Isharat Siddiqua Lodhy, Parveen Munshi, Sakina Jumani
{"title":"Blended Learning: Past and Present with Special Reference to COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Aisha Shams Akhunzada, Isharat Siddiqua Lodhy, Parveen Munshi, Sakina Jumani","doi":"10.36261/ijdeel.v7i1.2226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Clayton Christensen academy describes blended learning as a structured educational program in which a student learns at least in part into internet-based content delivery and training with some characteristic of academic supervision from home. This process involved time, place, pattern, and careful monitoring facilities. It also encouraged the learners to feel more optimistic regarding their studies. The fundamental concept of driving blended learning is that it encourages a combination of self-learning and collective communication-oriented practices. However, during COVID-19 besides virtual and non-formal institutions, the formal educational institutes also moved to blended learning. As this was a new practice for the formal instructors and learners, therefore, this study was carried out for discovering the concept of blended learning with special reference to COVID-19 pandemic and for this reason three sub purposes were; shed light on the concept of blended learning; to describe terminologies used for blended learning in the past and present with special reference to COVID-19 pandemic and to discover blended learning strategies in the past and presnt with special reference to COVID-19. This study chartered a qualitative method with succeeding in the analysis of documents related to blended learning and how this strategy was used during COVID -19 for engaging the formal instructors with their students. The Study followed the five years documents available online since 2011-20. But some documents from 2021 were also viewed for methodology.The researchers’ inquiry into 10 years of data was for the purpose to discover the past strategies of blended learning in comparison to the strategies used during COVID-19. Data were analyzed through emerging themes from the documents. Therefore, the main themes aided to interpret the results. The results exposed dissimilar terms for blended learning such as F2F, hybrid, and the online teaching-learning process.The strategies used during COVID-19 were more advanced as compared to the past years. Traditional methods of blended learning included online sessions and face-to-face classes. Microsoft, Webinar, TREAD, zoom, and Google Classroom, and other applications have been commonly used throughout the COVID-19 affected countries. The formal institutions for the teaching-learning process to carry out in COVID-19 period frequently practiced some new strategies.","PeriodicalId":52947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Distance Education and ELearning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Distance Education and ELearning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36261/ijdeel.v7i1.2226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Clayton Christensen academy describes blended learning as a structured educational program in which a student learns at least in part into internet-based content delivery and training with some characteristic of academic supervision from home. This process involved time, place, pattern, and careful monitoring facilities. It also encouraged the learners to feel more optimistic regarding their studies. The fundamental concept of driving blended learning is that it encourages a combination of self-learning and collective communication-oriented practices. However, during COVID-19 besides virtual and non-formal institutions, the formal educational institutes also moved to blended learning. As this was a new practice for the formal instructors and learners, therefore, this study was carried out for discovering the concept of blended learning with special reference to COVID-19 pandemic and for this reason three sub purposes were; shed light on the concept of blended learning; to describe terminologies used for blended learning in the past and present with special reference to COVID-19 pandemic and to discover blended learning strategies in the past and presnt with special reference to COVID-19. This study chartered a qualitative method with succeeding in the analysis of documents related to blended learning and how this strategy was used during COVID -19 for engaging the formal instructors with their students. The Study followed the five years documents available online since 2011-20. But some documents from 2021 were also viewed for methodology.The researchers’ inquiry into 10 years of data was for the purpose to discover the past strategies of blended learning in comparison to the strategies used during COVID-19. Data were analyzed through emerging themes from the documents. Therefore, the main themes aided to interpret the results. The results exposed dissimilar terms for blended learning such as F2F, hybrid, and the online teaching-learning process.The strategies used during COVID-19 were more advanced as compared to the past years. Traditional methods of blended learning included online sessions and face-to-face classes. Microsoft, Webinar, TREAD, zoom, and Google Classroom, and other applications have been commonly used throughout the COVID-19 affected countries. The formal institutions for the teaching-learning process to carry out in COVID-19 period frequently practiced some new strategies.
混合学习:过去和现在,特别参考COVID-19大流行
克莱顿克里斯滕森学院将混合式学习描述为一种结构化的教育计划,在这种计划中,学生至少部分地学习基于互联网的内容传递和培训,并具有一些在家学习监督的特点。这一过程涉及时间、地点、模式和仔细的监测设施。它还鼓励学习者对他们的学习感到更加乐观。驱动混合式学习的基本概念是,它鼓励自我学习和集体交流导向的实践相结合。然而,在2019冠状病毒病期间,除了虚拟和非正规机构外,正规教育机构也转向混合学习。由于这是正式教师和学习者的新做法,因此,本研究的目的是发现混合学习的概念,特别参考COVID-19大流行,因此有三个子目的:阐明混合式学习的概念;描述过去和现在用于混合学习的术语,特别参考COVID-19大流行,并发现过去和现在的混合学习策略,特别参考COVID-19。本研究采用了一种定性方法,成功地分析了与混合学习相关的文件,以及在COVID -19期间如何使用该策略使正式教师与学生接触。该研究追踪了自2011- 2020年以来在线提供的五年文件。但也查看了2021年的一些文件的方法。研究人员对10年的数据进行了调查,目的是将过去的混合学习策略与COVID-19期间使用的策略进行比较。通过文件中出现的主题分析数据。因此,主要主题有助于解释结果。结果揭示了混合学习的不同术语,如F2F、混合和在线教学过程。与过去几年相比,2019冠状病毒病期间使用的战略更加先进。传统的混合式学习方法包括在线课程和面对面课程。微软、Webinar、TREAD、zoom和谷歌教室等应用程序在受COVID-19影响的国家普遍使用。在新冠肺炎疫情期间,正规院校在开展教与学过程中频频实践一些新的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信