Evaluation of Some Modalities of Therapy in Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia

Y. Altaweel, Mahmoud E.Elebeary, Wafaa S. Mohamed, Mohamed A. Alsadek
{"title":"Evaluation of Some Modalities of Therapy in Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia","authors":"Y. Altaweel, Mahmoud E.Elebeary, Wafaa S. Mohamed, Mohamed A. Alsadek","doi":"10.12691/IJCEN-5-1-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first-line management for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (ITN) is medical therapy. The effectiveness of medications typically wanes over time, so we need to evaluate other modality of therapy. Objective: To compare pharmacotherapy versus Gamma knife radiotherapy (GKRS) in relief of pain in patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (ITN). Methods: the study included sixty eight patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. They were assessed by Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity scale. They were classified into two groups: Group I: 34 patients, were treated by GKRS and were chosen from Gamma knife center in Nasser institute hospital. They were 19 (55.9%) male and 15 (44.1%) female with ages ranged from 40-59 years (Mean±SD was 49.5±6.1). They were assessed by BNI scale before and immediately after GKRS, One month and three months after GKRS treatment. Group II: 34 patients, were chosen from neurology department Zagazig University Hospitals. They were 19 (55.9%) male and 15 (44.1%) female with ages ranged from 40-60 years (Mean±SD was 49.0±6.95). They were assessed by BNI scale before and one week after pharmacotherapy, One month and three months after pharmacotherapy. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding pain intensity before GKRS or pharmacotherapy (p=0.33) while one week after pharmacotherapy ten (29.4%) patients showed statistically significant improvement of pain.After one month, group I showed statistical significant better outcome (41.2%) than group II (8.8%). BNI score three months after managements was highly statisticallly significant better (32.4%) among group I than group II (p=0.001). Most of group I (82.4%) had good overall outcome while 50% of group II had fair outcome and26.5% had good outcome.Conclusion: medical management of ITN had an initial good results in improving pain intensity which begins to wane over one month and the effect of GKRS begins to appear. The effect of GKRS on ITN pain is still evolving through three months follow up.","PeriodicalId":75709,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental neurology","volume":"5 1","pages":"28-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/IJCEN-5-1-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The first-line management for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (ITN) is medical therapy. The effectiveness of medications typically wanes over time, so we need to evaluate other modality of therapy. Objective: To compare pharmacotherapy versus Gamma knife radiotherapy (GKRS) in relief of pain in patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (ITN). Methods: the study included sixty eight patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. They were assessed by Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity scale. They were classified into two groups: Group I: 34 patients, were treated by GKRS and were chosen from Gamma knife center in Nasser institute hospital. They were 19 (55.9%) male and 15 (44.1%) female with ages ranged from 40-59 years (Mean±SD was 49.5±6.1). They were assessed by BNI scale before and immediately after GKRS, One month and three months after GKRS treatment. Group II: 34 patients, were chosen from neurology department Zagazig University Hospitals. They were 19 (55.9%) male and 15 (44.1%) female with ages ranged from 40-60 years (Mean±SD was 49.0±6.95). They were assessed by BNI scale before and one week after pharmacotherapy, One month and three months after pharmacotherapy. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding pain intensity before GKRS or pharmacotherapy (p=0.33) while one week after pharmacotherapy ten (29.4%) patients showed statistically significant improvement of pain.After one month, group I showed statistical significant better outcome (41.2%) than group II (8.8%). BNI score three months after managements was highly statisticallly significant better (32.4%) among group I than group II (p=0.001). Most of group I (82.4%) had good overall outcome while 50% of group II had fair outcome and26.5% had good outcome.Conclusion: medical management of ITN had an initial good results in improving pain intensity which begins to wane over one month and the effect of GKRS begins to appear. The effect of GKRS on ITN pain is still evolving through three months follow up.
特发性三叉神经痛几种治疗方法的评价
特发性三叉神经痛(ITN)的一线治疗是药物治疗。药物的有效性通常会随着时间的推移而减弱,因此我们需要评估其他治疗方式。目的:比较药物治疗与伽玛刀放疗(GKRS)对特发性三叉神经痛(ITN)患者疼痛的缓解作用。方法:本研究包括68例特发性三叉神经痛患者。他们通过巴罗神经研究所(BNI)疼痛强度量表进行评估。他们被分为两组:第一组:34名患者,接受GKRS治疗,选自纳赛尔研究所医院伽玛刀中心。男19例(55.9%),女15例(44.1%),年龄40-59岁(平均值±标准差为49.5±6.1)。第二组:34名患者,选自扎加济格大学医院神经内科。其中男性19例(55.9%),女性15例(44.1%),年龄40-60岁(平均值±标准差为49.0±6.95)。结果:两组患者在GKRS或药物治疗前的疼痛强度没有统计学显著差异(p=0.33),而药物治疗一周后,10名(29.4%)患者的疼痛有统计学显著改善。一个月后,第一组的结果(41.2%)比第二组(8.8%)有统计学意义。治疗后三个月,BNI评分在第一组中有统计学意义(32.4%)比第II组好(p=0.001)。第一组大多数(82.4%)的总体结果良好,第二组50%的结果尚可,6.5%的结果良好。结论:ITN的药物治疗在改善疼痛强度方面取得了初步的良好效果,疼痛强度在一个月后开始减弱,GKRS的效果开始显现。GKRS对ITN疼痛的影响在三个月的随访中仍在发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信