Die instabile Rechtmäßigkeit von Verwaltungsakten als Auslegungsproblem

Q4 Social Sciences
Verwaltung Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI:10.3790/VERW.50.4.483
D. Kuch
{"title":"Die instabile Rechtmäßigkeit von Verwaltungsakten als Auslegungsproblem","authors":"D. Kuch","doi":"10.3790/VERW.50.4.483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every legal act issued by the administrative authorities has to be lawful. Lawfulness in a material sense (materielle Rechtmasigkeit) is considered as non-contradiction between the content of the legal act and the content of the legal order. If the regulative content of such an act has intertemporal existence its lawfulness is permanently in question. This essay is about administrative acts (Verwaltungsakte) which are legal acts of this kind. It treats the common ways in which their lawfulness is established with a special focus on the intertemporal aspect. From this perspective lawfulness is open to changes, it can be seen as a contingent quality of such legal acts. An administrative act can, for example, lose its (previously given) conformity with rules of law in case the factual or normative situation changes. The article connects this phenomenon with the thesis of the Federal Administrative Court according to which the management of such changes in the legal situation is built into the content of the same laws on which the lawfulness of such acts depends. From our point of view the arising interpretative question can be understood more precisely, and some general lines of argument dealing with this question can be described. Thereby the essay wants to contribute to the substitution of case-by-case interpretation by a more dogmatic-holistic approach.","PeriodicalId":36848,"journal":{"name":"Verwaltung","volume":"50 1","pages":"483-505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verwaltung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/VERW.50.4.483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Every legal act issued by the administrative authorities has to be lawful. Lawfulness in a material sense (materielle Rechtmasigkeit) is considered as non-contradiction between the content of the legal act and the content of the legal order. If the regulative content of such an act has intertemporal existence its lawfulness is permanently in question. This essay is about administrative acts (Verwaltungsakte) which are legal acts of this kind. It treats the common ways in which their lawfulness is established with a special focus on the intertemporal aspect. From this perspective lawfulness is open to changes, it can be seen as a contingent quality of such legal acts. An administrative act can, for example, lose its (previously given) conformity with rules of law in case the factual or normative situation changes. The article connects this phenomenon with the thesis of the Federal Administrative Court according to which the management of such changes in the legal situation is built into the content of the same laws on which the lawfulness of such acts depends. From our point of view the arising interpretative question can be understood more precisely, and some general lines of argument dealing with this question can be described. Thereby the essay wants to contribute to the substitution of case-by-case interpretation by a more dogmatic-holistic approach.
作为解释问题的行政行为的不稳定合法性
行政机关发布的每一个法律行为都必须是合法的。物质意义上的合法性(materielle Rechtmasigkeit)被认为是法律行为的内容与法律秩序的内容之间不存在矛盾。如果此类行为的规范性内容具有跨期存在性,则其合法性将永远受到质疑。本文对行政行为这一法律行为进行了研究。本文以跨期方面为重点,探讨了确立其合法性的常见方式。从这个角度来看,合法性是可以改变的,它可以被看作是这种法律行为的偶然性质。例如,如果事实或规范情况发生变化,行政行为可能失去其(先前给予的)与法律规则的一致性。本文将这一现象与联邦行政法院的论点联系起来,根据这一论点,对法律形势变化的管理被纳入这些行为的合法性所依赖的同一法律的内容中。从我们的观点来看,出现的解释性问题可以得到更精确的理解,并且可以描述处理这个问题的一些一般的论证路线。因此,本文希望以一种更教条的整体方法来取代个案解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Verwaltung
Verwaltung Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信