Audiovisual sphere and creative industries: morphological transformations in the first quarter of the XXI century

A. Alfiorov, Z. Alfiorova
{"title":"Audiovisual sphere and creative industries: morphological transformations in the first quarter of the XXI century","authors":"A. Alfiorov, Z. Alfiorova","doi":"10.31516/2410-5325.077.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to analyze the morphological transformations of the audiovisual sphere and the sphere of creative industries in the first quarter of the XXI century. The object is the audiovisual sphere and the sphere of creative industries. The subject is morphological transformations in the specified areas in the first quarter of the XXI century. The relevance of this article lies in the need to understand the convergence of the morphological foundations of the audiovisual sphere with the morphology of modern creative industries and their mutual transformations. \nThe methodology of the theoretical analysis in this article is based on both the whole complex of ideas related to the object of research and a specific scientific toolkit formed by the morphological methodological discourse. It is noted that in Ukraine, the school and directions of research of Ukrainian morphologists are only being formed. In the works of T. Borsunivska (theory of literary genres), I. Yurchenko (visual and morphological regularities of ornament) and some others, only certain local aspects of morphological issues were considered. The authors of the mentioned article also published works related to the principles of the functioning of the morphological system of audiovisual art in the modern age, its formation, etc. The article takes into account the concepts of post-industrial society by D. Bell, the concepts of information society and society of network structures by M. Castells. interesting concepts of “creative economy” by J. Hawkins, “cultural economy” by D. Throsby and A. J. Scott, “flowing modernity” by Z. Bauman, etc. \nThe results. 1. Periodization of morphological transformations of the first quarter of the XXI century, which included two stages — from the 2000s to the 2010s — changes at the stage of “primary” digitization; from 2011 to today — at the stage of “secondary” digitization. A comparative analysis of these changes in both spheres of the West and Ukraine in the temporal dimension shows that in our country there is a certain delay in “secondary” digitization, both for objective reasons (the COVID-19 pandemic; the Russian-Ukrainian war) and sub-objective (insufficient development of the digitized Ukrainian environment). However, Ukraine strives to overcome these shortcomings. 2. The conclusion that in the temporal dimension both spheres, both in the West and in Ukraine, were morphologically structured almost synchronously, although they had different morphological sources of this structuring 3. The conclusion that in the spatial dimension, the transformations touched on the level of formation — changes in the “boundaries” of the “internal” and “external” space of both audiovisual artistic form and creative practice; at the level of species and genre creation — in a significant strengthening of the non-hierarchical nature of both spheres (and therefore turbulence) and an almost complete transition to a network type of functioning. There is also an active convergence of the morphologies of both spheres and the strengthening of mutual influences between them. \nThe scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that the morphological transformations of the modern audiovisual sphere and the sphere of creative industries are studied for the first time. A comparative analysis of these changes between the West and Ukraine was made. The analysis was made based on the temporal and spatial existence of both morphological systems. \nThe practical significance of the article lies in the fact that the scientific analysis made allows us to identify the phases of the lag in both of these spheres in Ukraine from the European ones, and to determine on its basis strategies for overcoming this lag in the future.","PeriodicalId":33223,"journal":{"name":"Kul''tura Ukrayini","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kul''tura Ukrayini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31516/2410-5325.077.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyze the morphological transformations of the audiovisual sphere and the sphere of creative industries in the first quarter of the XXI century. The object is the audiovisual sphere and the sphere of creative industries. The subject is morphological transformations in the specified areas in the first quarter of the XXI century. The relevance of this article lies in the need to understand the convergence of the morphological foundations of the audiovisual sphere with the morphology of modern creative industries and their mutual transformations. The methodology of the theoretical analysis in this article is based on both the whole complex of ideas related to the object of research and a specific scientific toolkit formed by the morphological methodological discourse. It is noted that in Ukraine, the school and directions of research of Ukrainian morphologists are only being formed. In the works of T. Borsunivska (theory of literary genres), I. Yurchenko (visual and morphological regularities of ornament) and some others, only certain local aspects of morphological issues were considered. The authors of the mentioned article also published works related to the principles of the functioning of the morphological system of audiovisual art in the modern age, its formation, etc. The article takes into account the concepts of post-industrial society by D. Bell, the concepts of information society and society of network structures by M. Castells. interesting concepts of “creative economy” by J. Hawkins, “cultural economy” by D. Throsby and A. J. Scott, “flowing modernity” by Z. Bauman, etc. The results. 1. Periodization of morphological transformations of the first quarter of the XXI century, which included two stages — from the 2000s to the 2010s — changes at the stage of “primary” digitization; from 2011 to today — at the stage of “secondary” digitization. A comparative analysis of these changes in both spheres of the West and Ukraine in the temporal dimension shows that in our country there is a certain delay in “secondary” digitization, both for objective reasons (the COVID-19 pandemic; the Russian-Ukrainian war) and sub-objective (insufficient development of the digitized Ukrainian environment). However, Ukraine strives to overcome these shortcomings. 2. The conclusion that in the temporal dimension both spheres, both in the West and in Ukraine, were morphologically structured almost synchronously, although they had different morphological sources of this structuring 3. The conclusion that in the spatial dimension, the transformations touched on the level of formation — changes in the “boundaries” of the “internal” and “external” space of both audiovisual artistic form and creative practice; at the level of species and genre creation — in a significant strengthening of the non-hierarchical nature of both spheres (and therefore turbulence) and an almost complete transition to a network type of functioning. There is also an active convergence of the morphologies of both spheres and the strengthening of mutual influences between them. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that the morphological transformations of the modern audiovisual sphere and the sphere of creative industries are studied for the first time. A comparative analysis of these changes between the West and Ukraine was made. The analysis was made based on the temporal and spatial existence of both morphological systems. The practical significance of the article lies in the fact that the scientific analysis made allows us to identify the phases of the lag in both of these spheres in Ukraine from the European ones, and to determine on its basis strategies for overcoming this lag in the future.
视听领域与创意产业:21世纪第一季度的形态转变
本文的目的是分析21世纪第一季度视听领域和创意产业领域的形态转变。对象是视听领域和创意产业领域。主题是二十一世纪第一季度特定区域的形态转换。本文的相关性在于需要理解视听领域的形态基础与现代创意产业的形态及其相互转化的趋同。本文的理论分析方法论既基于与研究对象相关的整个复杂思想,也基于形态方法论话语形成的特定科学工具包。值得注意的是,在乌克兰,乌克兰形态学家的学派和研究方向才刚刚形成。在T.Borsunivska(文学流派理论)、I.Yurchenko(装饰的视觉和形态规律)和其他一些人的作品中,只考虑了形态问题的某些局部方面。上述文章的作者还发表了与现代视听艺术形态系统的功能原理及其形成等有关的作品。文章考虑到了D.Bell的后工业社会概念,M.Castells的信息社会和网络结构社会概念,J.Hawkins的“创造性经济”,D.Throsby和A.J.Scott的“文化经济”,Z.Bauman的“流动的现代性”等有趣的概念。1.21世纪第一季度形态转换的周期性,包括两个阶段——从2000年代到2010年代——“初级”数字化阶段的变化;从2011年到今天,处于“二次”数字化阶段。从时间维度对西方和乌克兰两个领域的这些变化进行的比较分析表明,在我国,“二次”数字化存在一定的延迟,这既有客观原因(新冠肺炎大流行;俄罗斯-乌克兰战争),也有次目标原因(乌克兰数字化环境发展不足)。然而,乌克兰努力克服这些缺点。2.结论是,在时间维度上,西方和乌克兰的两个球体在形态上的结构几乎是同步的,尽管它们有不同的形态来源3。结论是,在空间维度上,这些转换触及了形成的层面——视听艺术形式和创作实践的“内部”和“外部”空间的“边界”的变化;在物种和流派创作的层面上——这两个领域的非等级性得到了显著加强(因此也产生了动荡),并几乎完全过渡到网络类型的功能。两个球体的形态也有积极的趋同,并加强了它们之间的相互影响。这项研究的科学新颖性在于,首次研究了现代视听领域和创意产业领域的形态转变。对西方和乌克兰的这些变化进行了比较分析。分析是基于这两个形态系统在时间和空间上的存在。这篇文章的实际意义在于,所做的科学分析使我们能够从欧洲的情况中确定乌克兰这两个领域的滞后阶段,并在此基础上确定未来克服这一滞后的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信