The ‘quiet hunt’: the significance of mushroom foraging among Russian-speaking immigrants in New York City

IF 5.3 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Tatiana Marquina, M. Emery, P. Hurley, Rachelle K. Gould
{"title":"The ‘quiet hunt’: the significance of mushroom foraging among Russian-speaking immigrants in New York City","authors":"Tatiana Marquina, M. Emery, P. Hurley, Rachelle K. Gould","doi":"10.1080/26395916.2022.2055148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Urban foraging provides city dwellers with numerous ecosystem services, but this human-nature interaction is largely missing from the urban ecosystem services scholarship. This exploratory study aims to address this gap in the literature and examines the benefits and values associated with foraging in New York City, United States. We focus on Russian-speaking mushroom foragers, a previously unstudied community. Data from 10 interviews reveals that for some groups, foraging is primarily about cultural ecosystem services, with a provisioning attribute. Foraging supports multiple benefits, most notably contributions to social relations, cultural heritage, and recreational experiences; these nonmaterial contributions often intertwine with material benefits. Our findings further demonstrate the mutual exchange of benefits between humans and nature, including services to ecosystems and species. Participants reported engagement in multiple stewardship practices and actively maintained and enhanced ecosystem services. We encourage future ecosystem services assessments to recognize foraging as an urban activity and consider the bi-directional exchange of benefits between humans and ecosystems. To some participants, foraging was an integral part of their relationship with the natural world, intertwined with relational values of connection to nature, kinship, love, and care. Our results suggest that relational values can be central for understanding the value of ecosystem services. Our study further illustrates that some ecosystem services may be associated with practices, rather than places, and future work should examine these links in more detail.","PeriodicalId":37104,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystems and People","volume":"18 1","pages":"226 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystems and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2022.2055148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Urban foraging provides city dwellers with numerous ecosystem services, but this human-nature interaction is largely missing from the urban ecosystem services scholarship. This exploratory study aims to address this gap in the literature and examines the benefits and values associated with foraging in New York City, United States. We focus on Russian-speaking mushroom foragers, a previously unstudied community. Data from 10 interviews reveals that for some groups, foraging is primarily about cultural ecosystem services, with a provisioning attribute. Foraging supports multiple benefits, most notably contributions to social relations, cultural heritage, and recreational experiences; these nonmaterial contributions often intertwine with material benefits. Our findings further demonstrate the mutual exchange of benefits between humans and nature, including services to ecosystems and species. Participants reported engagement in multiple stewardship practices and actively maintained and enhanced ecosystem services. We encourage future ecosystem services assessments to recognize foraging as an urban activity and consider the bi-directional exchange of benefits between humans and ecosystems. To some participants, foraging was an integral part of their relationship with the natural world, intertwined with relational values of connection to nature, kinship, love, and care. Our results suggest that relational values can be central for understanding the value of ecosystem services. Our study further illustrates that some ecosystem services may be associated with practices, rather than places, and future work should examine these links in more detail.
“安静的狩猎”:在纽约市讲俄语的移民中寻找蘑菇的意义
摘要城市觅食为城市居民提供了众多的生态系统服务,但这种人与自然的互动在很大程度上被城市生态系统服务学术所忽视。这项探索性研究旨在解决文献中的这一空白,并考察了在美国纽约市觅食的好处和价值。我们关注的是讲俄语的蘑菇觅食者,这是一个以前未经研究的社区。来自10次采访的数据显示,对一些群体来说,觅食主要是关于文化生态系统服务,具有供应属性。觅食有多种好处,最显著的是对社会关系、文化遗产和娱乐体验的贡献;这些非物质贡献往往与物质利益交织在一起。我们的发现进一步证明了人类和自然之间的利益交换,包括对生态系统和物种的服务。与会者报告参与了多种管理做法,并积极维护和加强了生态系统服务。我们鼓励未来的生态系统服务评估将觅食视为一种城市活动,并考虑人类和生态系统之间的双向利益交换。对一些参与者来说,觅食是他们与自然世界关系的一个组成部分,与与自然、亲情、爱和关怀的关系价值观交织在一起。我们的研究结果表明,关系价值观可以成为理解生态系统服务价值的核心。我们的研究进一步表明,一些生态系统服务可能与实践有关,而不是与地方有关,未来的工作应该更详细地研究这些联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosystems and People
Ecosystems and People Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.30%
发文量
40
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecosystems and People is an interdisciplinary journal that addresses how biodiversity and ecosystems underpin human quality of life, and how societal activities and preferences drive changes in ecosystems. Research published in Ecosystems and People addresses human-nature relationships and social-ecological systems in a broad sense. This embraces research on biodiversity, ecosystem services, their contributions to quality of life, implications for equity and justice, and the diverse and rich ways in which people relate to nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信