Agility assessment framework for modular and offsite construction

IF 3.1 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Tarek Salama, Hisham Said
{"title":"Agility assessment framework for modular and offsite construction","authors":"Tarek Salama, Hisham Said","doi":"10.1108/ci-09-2022-0238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to determine if companies in the modular and offsite construction (MOC) industry are agile or not and its level of application for agility principles, which allows for quick responses to the increasingly dynamic nature of industry environments.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper proposes an agility assessment framework for MOC that uses 48 assessment attributes organized into four categories: metrics, drivers, enablers and capabilities. A questionnaire approach was used to disseminate the framework globally in 19 countries and synthesize its relevance to the MOC industry. The questionnaire had 55 complete responses, majority of respondents work in managerial positions for MOC manufacturing facilities and onsite general contractors.\n\n\nFindings\nIt was found that the lowest metric score for adapting to change was for cost since controlling cost would be difficult for any changes required after the design freeze stage. The top agility driver was found to be the need to respond to the wide variety of customer expectations, while the lowest driver was the existence of competing priorities. The top agility enabler was vendor partnership, which can be related to current postpandemic supply chain disruptions. Regarding technological capabilities, Europe and the USA acquired better scores compared to Asia, Latin America and Africa.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to the MOC body of knowledge by creating an agility assessment tool for MOC firms to analyze their agile approach and environment, identifying the preliminary importance of agility assessment attributes and determining significant agile differences between the main MOC industry groups.\n","PeriodicalId":45580,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation-England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation-England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-09-2022-0238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine if companies in the modular and offsite construction (MOC) industry are agile or not and its level of application for agility principles, which allows for quick responses to the increasingly dynamic nature of industry environments. Design/methodology/approach This paper proposes an agility assessment framework for MOC that uses 48 assessment attributes organized into four categories: metrics, drivers, enablers and capabilities. A questionnaire approach was used to disseminate the framework globally in 19 countries and synthesize its relevance to the MOC industry. The questionnaire had 55 complete responses, majority of respondents work in managerial positions for MOC manufacturing facilities and onsite general contractors. Findings It was found that the lowest metric score for adapting to change was for cost since controlling cost would be difficult for any changes required after the design freeze stage. The top agility driver was found to be the need to respond to the wide variety of customer expectations, while the lowest driver was the existence of competing priorities. The top agility enabler was vendor partnership, which can be related to current postpandemic supply chain disruptions. Regarding technological capabilities, Europe and the USA acquired better scores compared to Asia, Latin America and Africa. Originality/value This study contributes to the MOC body of knowledge by creating an agility assessment tool for MOC firms to analyze their agile approach and environment, identifying the preliminary importance of agility assessment attributes and determining significant agile differences between the main MOC industry groups.
模块化和非现场施工的敏捷性评估框架
目的本文的目的是确定模块化和非现场施工(MOC)行业中的公司是否敏捷,以及其对敏捷性原则的应用水平,该原则允许对行业环境日益动态的性质做出快速反应。设计/方法论/方法本文提出了一个主运行中心敏捷性评估框架,该框架使用48个评估属性,分为四类:指标、驱动因素、使能因素和能力。采用问卷调查法在全球19个国家传播该框架,并综合其与主运行中心行业的相关性。问卷共有55个完整的回答,大多数回答者在主运行中心制造设施和现场总承包商的管理职位上工作。结果发现,适应变化的最低指标得分是成本,因为在设计冻结阶段后,控制成本对于任何需要的变化都是困难的。敏捷性最高的驱动因素是需要对各种各样的客户期望做出反应,而最低的驱动因素则是存在相互竞争的优先级。最具灵活性的因素是供应商合作,这可能与当前疫情后的供应链中断有关。在技术能力方面,与亚洲、拉丁美洲和非洲相比,欧洲和美国获得了更好的分数。原始性/价值这项研究通过为MOC公司创建一个敏捷性评估工具来分析其敏捷方法和环境,为MOC知识体系做出了贡献,确定敏捷性评估属性的初步重要性,并确定主运行中心行业主要群体之间的显著敏捷差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction Innovation-England
Construction Innovation-England CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
12.10%
发文量
71
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信