Rehabilitation of Stroke-Induced Spastic Paralysis using Stretching-resisting Modality Combined with LFEA (Low-Frequency Electric Acupuncture) Stimulation

Un-Sung Paek, Se-Il Song
{"title":"Rehabilitation of Stroke-Induced Spastic Paralysis using Stretching-resisting Modality Combined with LFEA (Low-Frequency Electric Acupuncture) Stimulation","authors":"Un-Sung Paek, Se-Il Song","doi":"10.5530/ijcep.2021.8.2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: In order to establish the method of rehabiliting the stroke-induced spastic paralysis, we tried stretching-resisting modality, combining with LFEA (low-frequency electric acupuncture) stimulation on the muscle. Methods: A total of 137 patients were devided into two groups-trial group (n=75) and compared group (n=62). Two groups of patients were given stretching-resisting modalities on paralysed muscles respectively, and LFEA (low-frequency electric acupuncture) stimulation was combined in the trial group, but not in the compared group. We have evaluated the paralysis using well-known scores as Ashworth Scales and Barthel Indices (BI) in the early days of admission and after we have finished the treatment. Then, we compared improved variances of the measures between two groups statistically. Results: We found that Ashworth Scale in trial group significantly reduced than in compared group, and more quickly reduced. Barthel Indice were significantly changed in both groups, but total BI and 2 BI items (transferring between bed and wheelchair, mobility on surface level) were increased significantly in trial group than in combined group. Conclusion: The combination of LFEA stimulation might increase the therapeutic effects for rehabilitation of stroke-induced spastic paralysis than simple stretching-resisting modality, and reduces the length of time to recovery. And the mostly changed ADLs (activities of daily life) might be transferring between bed and wheelchair and mobility on surface level.","PeriodicalId":92049,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical and experimental physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical and experimental physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/ijcep.2021.8.2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: In order to establish the method of rehabiliting the stroke-induced spastic paralysis, we tried stretching-resisting modality, combining with LFEA (low-frequency electric acupuncture) stimulation on the muscle. Methods: A total of 137 patients were devided into two groups-trial group (n=75) and compared group (n=62). Two groups of patients were given stretching-resisting modalities on paralysed muscles respectively, and LFEA (low-frequency electric acupuncture) stimulation was combined in the trial group, but not in the compared group. We have evaluated the paralysis using well-known scores as Ashworth Scales and Barthel Indices (BI) in the early days of admission and after we have finished the treatment. Then, we compared improved variances of the measures between two groups statistically. Results: We found that Ashworth Scale in trial group significantly reduced than in compared group, and more quickly reduced. Barthel Indice were significantly changed in both groups, but total BI and 2 BI items (transferring between bed and wheelchair, mobility on surface level) were increased significantly in trial group than in combined group. Conclusion: The combination of LFEA stimulation might increase the therapeutic effects for rehabilitation of stroke-induced spastic paralysis than simple stretching-resisting modality, and reduces the length of time to recovery. And the mostly changed ADLs (activities of daily life) might be transferring between bed and wheelchair and mobility on surface level.
抗拉伸结合低频电针刺激对中风性痉挛性麻痹的康复
背景与目的:为了建立脑卒中痉挛性麻痹的康复方法,我们尝试了抗拉伸方式,结合低频电针对肌肉的刺激。方法:137例患者分为两组,试验组(n=75)和对照组(n=62)。两组患者分别给予麻痹肌肉抗拉方式,实验组联合LFEA(低频电针)刺激,对照组不联合。我们在入院早期和治疗结束后,使用著名的阿什沃斯量表和巴特尔指数(BI)来评估瘫痪。然后,我们比较两组测量的改进方差进行统计学比较。结果:实验组Ashworth评分明显低于对照组,且下降速度更快。两组患者Barthel指数均有显著变化,但试验组总BI和2项BI项目(床与轮椅间移动、体表水平活动能力)均显著高于联合组。结论:LFEA联合刺激对脑卒中性痉挛性麻痹的康复治疗效果优于单纯的抗拉伸方式,并可缩短康复时间。日常生活活动能力(ADLs)变化最大的可能是在床和轮椅之间的转移和表面水平的活动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信