Against Financialization as Freedom: Errant Investments in Kopano Matlwa's Coconut and Rehad Desai's Everything Must Fall

IF 0.4 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Jesse Arseneault
{"title":"Against Financialization as Freedom: Errant Investments in Kopano Matlwa's Coconut and Rehad Desai's Everything Must Fall","authors":"Jesse Arseneault","doi":"10.1353/ari.2021.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article explores investment and inheritance across the generational divide between South Africa's so-called born frees and the protest cultures of the post-Fallism era. Positing that colonized worlds generate investments, financially and affectively, in whiteness and antiblackness, I consider how various South African cultural texts perform labours of disinheritance and disinvestment against the limited legacies racial capitalism bequeaths on its subjects. I analyze texts ranging from the online #Tipgate scandal of 2015 to poetry by Lebogang Mashile, Kopano Matlwa's novel Coconut (2007), and Rehad Desai's film Everything Must Fall (2018). In the context of a post-apartheid discourse that has structured freedom around notions of financial mobility inherited from racial capitalism, I argue that these texts refuse the lifelines supplied by Eurocentric market capital and direct their subjects toward Afrocentric futures. These futures often involve rejecting the financial as the exclusive metric of social value in post-apartheid South Africa. I discuss the limits of financial freedoms in born free narratives about family and collectivity and in Fallist protests over the Eurocentric legacies of the university. Rejecting pejorative renderings of decolonial work in the Fallist period as essentially destructive—an allegation that, I suggest, derives from paradigms of inherited Eurocentric value—the article emphasizes how the texts under discussion participate in the labour of dismantling certain inheritances and cultivating alternate possible futures.","PeriodicalId":51893,"journal":{"name":"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE","volume":"52 1","pages":"63 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ari.2021.0025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:This article explores investment and inheritance across the generational divide between South Africa's so-called born frees and the protest cultures of the post-Fallism era. Positing that colonized worlds generate investments, financially and affectively, in whiteness and antiblackness, I consider how various South African cultural texts perform labours of disinheritance and disinvestment against the limited legacies racial capitalism bequeaths on its subjects. I analyze texts ranging from the online #Tipgate scandal of 2015 to poetry by Lebogang Mashile, Kopano Matlwa's novel Coconut (2007), and Rehad Desai's film Everything Must Fall (2018). In the context of a post-apartheid discourse that has structured freedom around notions of financial mobility inherited from racial capitalism, I argue that these texts refuse the lifelines supplied by Eurocentric market capital and direct their subjects toward Afrocentric futures. These futures often involve rejecting the financial as the exclusive metric of social value in post-apartheid South Africa. I discuss the limits of financial freedoms in born free narratives about family and collectivity and in Fallist protests over the Eurocentric legacies of the university. Rejecting pejorative renderings of decolonial work in the Fallist period as essentially destructive—an allegation that, I suggest, derives from paradigms of inherited Eurocentric value—the article emphasizes how the texts under discussion participate in the labour of dismantling certain inheritances and cultivating alternate possible futures.
反对金融自由化:对Kopano Matlwa的《椰子》和Rehad Desai的《一切都必须倒下》的错误投资
摘要:本文探讨了南非所谓的天生自由主义和后法西斯主义时代的抗议文化之间跨越代沟的投资和继承。我认为,殖民世界在白人和反黑人方面产生了经济和情感上的投资,我思考了各种南非文化文本是如何对种族资本主义遗留在其主体上的有限遗产进行剥夺继承权和撤资的劳动的。我分析了从2015年的网络#Tipgate丑闻到Lebogang Mashile的诗歌、Kopano Matlwa的小说《椰子》(2007年)和Rehad Desai的电影《一切都必须坠落》(2018年)等文本。在后种族隔离话语的背景下,我认为这些文本拒绝了以欧洲为中心的市场资本提供的生命线,并将其主题指向以非洲为中心的未来。这些未来往往涉及拒绝将金融作为后种族隔离南非社会价值的唯一衡量标准。我在关于家庭和集体的天生自由的叙事中,以及在对大学以欧洲为中心的遗产的Fallist抗议中,讨论了金融自由的局限性。这篇文章驳斥了对Fallist时期非殖民化工作的贬损,认为其本质上是破坏性的——我认为,这一指控源于继承的欧洲中心价值观的范式——强调了所讨论的文本如何参与拆除某些遗产和培育替代可能未来的劳动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信