The politics of museal hospitality: Sonia Boyce’s neo-Victorian takeover in Six Acts

IF 0.7 4区 文学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES
Felipe Espinoza Garrido, Ana Cristina Mendes
{"title":"The politics of museal hospitality: Sonia Boyce’s neo-Victorian takeover in Six Acts","authors":"Felipe Espinoza Garrido, Ana Cristina Mendes","doi":"10.1080/13825577.2020.1876595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Museums and their painstakingly curated constructions of history are increasingly being scrutinised for their heteronormative, androcentric and decisively white biases, often through museum interventions. Based on an understanding of museal hospitality as the constantly-shifting laws that regulate access to Britain’s prestigious exhibition spaces (and the intersections of these spaces with issues of race and gender), this article posits that Sonia Boyce’s Six Acts (2018) can be understood as a neo-Victorian intervention that critiques and forces us to acknowledge the conditions of Britain’s museal hospitality. In conceptualising the museum space as a host, based on Immanuel Kant’s and, particularly, Jacques Derrida’s notion of hospitality, this article argues that Six Acts addresses and modulates the relationship between host and guest, and interrelatedly, re-conceptualises the Victorian art gallery as a neo-Victorian museum (as an institutional space that self-consciously and reflexively engages with the gendered and racialised subtexts of Victorian visual arts). Boyce’s artwork performs epistemic labour, helping us to continually unlearn both the Victorian ideological biases that still suffuse contemporary discourses on heritage and art, on artistic merit as a law of hospitality, and a distorted imagination of a historically white Victorian Britain.","PeriodicalId":43819,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of English Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"283 - 299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13825577.2020.1876595","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2020.1876595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Museums and their painstakingly curated constructions of history are increasingly being scrutinised for their heteronormative, androcentric and decisively white biases, often through museum interventions. Based on an understanding of museal hospitality as the constantly-shifting laws that regulate access to Britain’s prestigious exhibition spaces (and the intersections of these spaces with issues of race and gender), this article posits that Sonia Boyce’s Six Acts (2018) can be understood as a neo-Victorian intervention that critiques and forces us to acknowledge the conditions of Britain’s museal hospitality. In conceptualising the museum space as a host, based on Immanuel Kant’s and, particularly, Jacques Derrida’s notion of hospitality, this article argues that Six Acts addresses and modulates the relationship between host and guest, and interrelatedly, re-conceptualises the Victorian art gallery as a neo-Victorian museum (as an institutional space that self-consciously and reflexively engages with the gendered and racialised subtexts of Victorian visual arts). Boyce’s artwork performs epistemic labour, helping us to continually unlearn both the Victorian ideological biases that still suffuse contemporary discourses on heritage and art, on artistic merit as a law of hospitality, and a distorted imagination of a historically white Victorian Britain.
博物馆式好客的政治:索尼娅·博伊斯在《六幕》中的新维多利亚时代接管
摘要博物馆及其精心策划的历史建筑正因其非规范性、以男性为中心和决定性的白人偏见而受到越来越多的审查,通常是通过博物馆干预。基于对博物馆热情好客的理解,博物馆热情好客是监管进入英国著名展览空间的不断变化的法律(以及这些空间与种族和性别问题的交叉点),本文认为,索尼娅·博伊斯的《六幕》(2018)可以被理解为一种新维多利亚时代的干预,它批评并迫使我们承认英国博物馆式好客的条件。在将博物馆空间概念化为主人的过程中,基于伊曼纽尔·康德,特别是雅克·德里达的好客概念,本文认为《六幕》处理和调节了主人和客人之间的关系,将维多利亚美术馆重新概念化为一个新维多利亚博物馆(作为一个自觉和反射地参与维多利亚视觉艺术的性别化和种族化潜台词的制度空间)。博伊斯的艺术作品进行了认识劳动,帮助我们不断摆脱维多利亚时代的意识形态偏见,这种偏见仍然充斥着当代关于遗产和艺术的讨论,以及作为好客法则的艺术价值,以及对历史上白人维多利亚时代英国的扭曲想象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信