Communicating stakeholder resilience: understanding how resilience discourse can build a fully functioning society

IF 4.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
L. Anderson, J. Guo
{"title":"Communicating stakeholder resilience: understanding how resilience discourse can build a fully functioning society","authors":"L. Anderson, J. Guo","doi":"10.1080/1062726X.2020.1867986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Resilience is an ongoing sensemaking process that relies on communicative interactions – including those that occur between stakeholders and organizations – in order to understand and respond to a given adversity. Resilience communication is enacted through discursive processes that align with the tenets of fully functioning society theory (FFS). In order to integrate these two theoretical frameworks, we completed a qualitative content analysis of AARP’s #DisruptAging campaign. In doing so, we found that the campaign provided information about age/aging in a way that countered commonly held stereotypes about older adults at multiple-levels (e.g., individual, organizational, societal). The processes of resilience were reflected in the organizational discourse, as was a new strategy – acceptance/appreciation. These findings illuminate the societal role of organizational discourse by showing how inclusive organizational-public communication can disrupt meta-narratives and enrich the marketplace of ideas, and thus contribute to the building of a fully functioning society through (re)constructing the meanings of resilience on individual, organizational, and societal levels.","PeriodicalId":47737,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Relations Research","volume":"33 1","pages":"23 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1062726X.2020.1867986","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Relations Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2020.1867986","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Resilience is an ongoing sensemaking process that relies on communicative interactions – including those that occur between stakeholders and organizations – in order to understand and respond to a given adversity. Resilience communication is enacted through discursive processes that align with the tenets of fully functioning society theory (FFS). In order to integrate these two theoretical frameworks, we completed a qualitative content analysis of AARP’s #DisruptAging campaign. In doing so, we found that the campaign provided information about age/aging in a way that countered commonly held stereotypes about older adults at multiple-levels (e.g., individual, organizational, societal). The processes of resilience were reflected in the organizational discourse, as was a new strategy – acceptance/appreciation. These findings illuminate the societal role of organizational discourse by showing how inclusive organizational-public communication can disrupt meta-narratives and enrich the marketplace of ideas, and thus contribute to the building of a fully functioning society through (re)constructing the meanings of resilience on individual, organizational, and societal levels.
沟通利益相关者的复原力:理解复原力话语如何构建一个全面运作的社会
摘要韧性是一个持续的感知过程,它依赖于沟通互动——包括利益相关者和组织之间的互动——以理解和应对特定的逆境。弹性沟通是通过符合充分运作社会理论(FFS)原则的话语过程来实现的。为了整合这两个理论框架,我们对美国退休人员协会的#DisruptAging活动进行了定性内容分析。在这样做的过程中,我们发现该运动提供了关于年龄/老龄化的信息,在多个层面(例如,个人、组织、社会)上反驳了人们对老年人的普遍刻板印象。恢复力的过程反映在组织话语中,新的战略——接受/赞赏也是如此。这些发现阐明了组织话语的社会作用,展示了包容性的组织公共传播如何破坏元叙事,丰富思想市场,从而通过(重新)构建个人、组织和社会层面的韧性意义,为建设一个全面运作的社会做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信