Dosage and Conditioning Period Determine Reward or Aversion to Cannabis-induced Conditioned Place Preference in Sprague-Dawley Rats

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
L. Young, Kp Chin-Quee
{"title":"Dosage and Conditioning Period Determine Reward or Aversion to Cannabis-induced Conditioned Place Preference in Sprague-Dawley Rats","authors":"L. Young, Kp Chin-Quee","doi":"10.7727/WIMJ.2017.185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the addictive potential of cannabis by investigating the motivational responses to low doses of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC) and a marijuana tea extract (MTE), and to determine if the length of the conditioning period in the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm influences reward or aversion to these cannabinoid preparations. Methods: Thirty-eight Sprague-Dawley rats were taken through a biased CPP paradigm utilizing an eight-day schedule. The pre-conditioning phase consisted of three trials of 15 minutes each, and the conditioning phase lasted either 40 or 18 minutes in the drug-paired, ‘nonpreferred’ white chamber or the vehicle-paired, ‘preferred’ black chamber. Spontaneous motor activity (SMA) was used to determine the 18-minute conditioning period, dosage of a crude MTE and the oil-based vehicle for ∆9-THC (coconut oil), which did not alter the SMA of the rats. Differences in the mean times spent in the ‘non-preferred’ white chamber during the preconditioning and post-conditioning periods were compared using paired t-test. Results: Significant place aversion (p < 0.0001) to the MTE occurred at the 40-minute conditioning period, but not at the 18-minute period. Also, significant CPP reward (p < 0.01) to 0.05 mg/kg ∆9-THC occurred with the reduced 18-minute conditioning period, while a non-significant increase in post-conditioning time at the higher dose of 2.0 mg/kg ∆9-THC was obtained. Conclusion: Drug-seeking, motivational reward to 0.05 mg/kg ∆9-THC confirmed the addictive potential of ∆9-THC. However, the duration of the conditioning period in the CPP design was a determinant of the outcome to CPP-reward or -aversion to marijuana.","PeriodicalId":49366,"journal":{"name":"West Indian Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West Indian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7727/WIMJ.2017.185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the addictive potential of cannabis by investigating the motivational responses to low doses of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC) and a marijuana tea extract (MTE), and to determine if the length of the conditioning period in the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm influences reward or aversion to these cannabinoid preparations. Methods: Thirty-eight Sprague-Dawley rats were taken through a biased CPP paradigm utilizing an eight-day schedule. The pre-conditioning phase consisted of three trials of 15 minutes each, and the conditioning phase lasted either 40 or 18 minutes in the drug-paired, ‘nonpreferred’ white chamber or the vehicle-paired, ‘preferred’ black chamber. Spontaneous motor activity (SMA) was used to determine the 18-minute conditioning period, dosage of a crude MTE and the oil-based vehicle for ∆9-THC (coconut oil), which did not alter the SMA of the rats. Differences in the mean times spent in the ‘non-preferred’ white chamber during the preconditioning and post-conditioning periods were compared using paired t-test. Results: Significant place aversion (p < 0.0001) to the MTE occurred at the 40-minute conditioning period, but not at the 18-minute period. Also, significant CPP reward (p < 0.01) to 0.05 mg/kg ∆9-THC occurred with the reduced 18-minute conditioning period, while a non-significant increase in post-conditioning time at the higher dose of 2.0 mg/kg ∆9-THC was obtained. Conclusion: Drug-seeking, motivational reward to 0.05 mg/kg ∆9-THC confirmed the addictive potential of ∆9-THC. However, the duration of the conditioning period in the CPP design was a determinant of the outcome to CPP-reward or -aversion to marijuana.
剂量和调节期决定Sprague-Dawley大鼠对大麻诱导的条件性地点偏好的奖赏或厌恶
目的:通过研究低剂量δ-9-四氢大麻酚(∆9-THC)和大麻茶提取物(MTE)的动机反应,评估大麻的成瘾潜力,并确定条件位置偏好(CPP)范式中的条件调节期长度是否影响对这些大麻素制剂的奖励或厌恶。方法:38只Sprague-Dawley大鼠采用有偏见的CPP模式,采用八天计划。预调理阶段包括三次试验,每次15分钟,调理阶段在药物配对的“非首选”白室或载体配对的“首选”黑室中持续40或18分钟。自发运动活性(SMA)用于确定18分钟的调理期、粗MTE的剂量和∆9-THC(椰子油)的油基载体,这不会改变大鼠的SMA。使用配对t检验比较预处理和后处理期间在“非首选”白室中花费的平均时间的差异。结果:对MTE的显著位置厌恶(p<0.0001)发生在40分钟的调节期,但没有发生在18分钟。此外,随着18分钟调理时间的缩短,0.05 mg/kg∆9-THC的CPP显著增加(p<0.01),而2.0 mg/kg∆9-THC的高剂量调理后时间没有显著增加。结论:0.05 mg/kg∆9-THC的药物寻求、动机性奖励证实了∆9-THC的成瘾潜力。然而,CPP设计中调节期的持续时间是CPP对大麻的奖励或厌恶结果的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
West Indian Medical Journal
West Indian Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal is international in scope, with author and editorial contributions from across the globe. The focus is on clinical and epidemiological aspects of tropical and infectious diseases, new and re-emerging infections, chronic non-communicable diseases, and medical conditions prevalent in the Latin America-Caribbean region, and of significance to global health, especially in developing countries. The Journal covers all medical disciplines, as well as basic and translational research elucidating the pathophysiologic basis of diseases or focussing on new therapeutic approaches, and publishes original scientific research, reviews, case reports, brief communications, letters, commentaries and medical images. The Journal publishes four to six issues and four supplements annually. English is the language of publication but Abstracts are also duplicated in Spanish. Most of the articles are submitted at the authors’ initiative, but some are solicited by the Editor-in-Chief. Unless expressly stated, the Editorial Board does not accept responsibility for authors’ opinions. All papers on submission are reviewed by a subcommittee. Those deemed worthy for review are sent to two or three reviewers (one of the three might be a statistician if necessary). The returned papers with reviewer comments are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief. Papers may be rejected, accepted or sent back to authors for revision. Resubmitted papers from authors are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief and may be sent back to reviewers or a final decision made by Editor-in-Chief. The decision of the Editorial Board is final with regards to rejected articles. Rejected articles will not be returned to the authors. The editorial subcommittee has the right to return sub-standard manuscripts to the authors, rather than passing them on to the reviewers. This implies outright rejection of the manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信