Race and racism in critical security studies

IF 2.8 1区社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Security Dialogue Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI:10.1177/09670106211038787

M. Salter, E. Gilbert, Jairus Grove, Jana Hönke, Doerthe Rosenow, Anna Stavrianakis, M. Stern

引用次数: 3

Abstract

But the inevitable postponing of critical scholarship about race, racialisation and racism forestalls the ability of Indigenous scholars and POC to invest our careers in these topics within the academy. If Universities are not yet ready to challenge white supremacy, will they ever be? And if a program on critical race thinking is not supported today, how can White scholars advance claims that academy is in fact a safe space for Indigenous scholars, let alone claim that decolonisation is occurring within the halls of the academy itself? (Todd, 2016: 13)

查看原文本刊更多论文

关键安全研究中的种族和种族主义

但是，不可避免地推迟了关于种族、种族化和种族主义的批判性学术研究，这阻碍了土著学者和POC在学术界将自己的职业生涯投入到这些主题上。如果大学还没有准备好挑战白人至上主义，它们会准备好吗?如果一个关于批判性种族思考的项目在今天得不到支持，白人学者怎么能声称学院实际上是土著学者的安全空间，更不用说声称非殖民化在学院本身的大厅里发生了?(托德，2016:13)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Security Dialogue INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

6.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Security Dialogue is a fully peer-reviewed and highly ranked international bi-monthly journal that seeks to combine contemporary theoretical analysis with challenges to public policy across a wide ranging field of security studies. Security Dialogue seeks to revisit and recast the concept of security through new approaches and methodologies.