Does corporate environmental performance affect corporate biodiversity reporting decision? The Finnish evidence

IF 3.9 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
P. Dutta, Anupam Dutta
{"title":"Does corporate environmental performance affect corporate biodiversity reporting decision? The Finnish evidence","authors":"P. Dutta, Anupam Dutta","doi":"10.1108/jaar-06-2022-0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to examine whether there exists any relationship between corporate biodiversity reporting decision (CBRD) and corporate environmental performance (CEP).Design/methodology/approachThe primary sample contains 442 firm-year observations over a period of 13 years (2008–2020) for 34 listed Finnish companies. Based on both legitimacy theory and voluntary disclosure theory, 2 logit regression models are estimated to test the CBRD–CEP nexus. CBRD is a dichotomous variable. Three proxies for CEP, namely propensity to emit greenhouse gas (GHG), propensity to consume water and propensity to generate waste are employed.FindingsThis study finds that firms having higher propensity to consume water and generate waste are inclined to release biodiversity-related information. The findings support legitimacy theory suggesting that firms with inferior environmental performance may decide on reporting biodiversity information for legitimation purpose.Research limitations/implicationsThe study uses Finnish data and hence, the results may lack in generalizability to other national contexts.Practical implicationsThe results of this study should be valuable to policy makers for formulating mandatory biodiversity reporting standards to ensure disclosure of standard, extensive and authentic biodiversity-related information by companies. The results should also be valuable to corporate managers and eco-friendly investors.Originality/valueCorporate biodiversity reporting (CBR) is an under-researched area of environmental accounting literature. Using the Finnish context, this paper extends the existing literature by investigating whether any association exists between CBRD and CEP, which has not been examined before.","PeriodicalId":46321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-06-2022-0148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to examine whether there exists any relationship between corporate biodiversity reporting decision (CBRD) and corporate environmental performance (CEP).Design/methodology/approachThe primary sample contains 442 firm-year observations over a period of 13 years (2008–2020) for 34 listed Finnish companies. Based on both legitimacy theory and voluntary disclosure theory, 2 logit regression models are estimated to test the CBRD–CEP nexus. CBRD is a dichotomous variable. Three proxies for CEP, namely propensity to emit greenhouse gas (GHG), propensity to consume water and propensity to generate waste are employed.FindingsThis study finds that firms having higher propensity to consume water and generate waste are inclined to release biodiversity-related information. The findings support legitimacy theory suggesting that firms with inferior environmental performance may decide on reporting biodiversity information for legitimation purpose.Research limitations/implicationsThe study uses Finnish data and hence, the results may lack in generalizability to other national contexts.Practical implicationsThe results of this study should be valuable to policy makers for formulating mandatory biodiversity reporting standards to ensure disclosure of standard, extensive and authentic biodiversity-related information by companies. The results should also be valuable to corporate managers and eco-friendly investors.Originality/valueCorporate biodiversity reporting (CBR) is an under-researched area of environmental accounting literature. Using the Finnish context, this paper extends the existing literature by investigating whether any association exists between CBRD and CEP, which has not been examined before.
企业环境绩效是否影响企业生物多样性报告决策?芬兰的证据
目的探讨企业生物多样性报告决策(CBRD)与企业环境绩效(CEP)之间是否存在关系。设计/方法/方法主要样本包含34家芬兰上市公司在13年(2008-2020年)期间的442家公司年度观察结果。基于合法性理论和自愿披露理论,估计了2个logistic回归模型来检验CBRD-CEP关系。CBRD是一个二分变量。采用了温室气体排放倾向、水消耗倾向和废物产生倾向这三个指标来衡量CEP。本研究发现,耗水和产生废物倾向较高的企业倾向于发布与生物多样性相关的信息。研究结果支持合法性理论,表明环境绩效较差的企业可能出于合法性目的而决定报告生物多样性信息。研究局限性/意义本研究使用了芬兰的数据,因此,研究结果可能缺乏对其他国家背景的通用性。本研究结果对决策者制定强制性生物多样性报告标准,以确保企业披露标准、广泛和真实的生物多样性相关信息具有参考价值。研究结果对企业管理者和环保投资者也应该是有价值的。企业生物多样性报告(CBR)是环境会计文献中一个研究不足的领域。利用芬兰的背景,本文通过调查CBRD和CEP之间是否存在任何关联来扩展现有文献,这在以前没有被研究过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Accounting Research provides a forum for the publication of high quality manuscripts concerning issues relevant to the practice of accounting in a wide variety of contexts. The journal seeks to promote a research agenda that allows academics and practitioners to work together to provide sustainable outcomes in a practice setting. The journal is keen to encourage academic research articles which develop a forum for the discussion of real, practical problems and provide the expertise to allow solutions to these problems to be formed, while also contributing to our theoretical understanding of such issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信