Brazilian agricultural sector: potentials and problems from different points of view

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Cornelia Gruber, Corinna Hausner, Irina Kinzner, Verena Kronberger, F. Schweikert
{"title":"Brazilian agricultural sector: potentials and problems from different points of view","authors":"Cornelia Gruber, Corinna Hausner, Irina Kinzner, Verena Kronberger, F. Schweikert","doi":"10.1504/IJFIP.2018.10018074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to discuss potentials and problems for the Brazilian agricultural sector from different points of view by applying the surfing global change (SGC) methodology. The intention is to give relevant stakeholders room for statements and to find solutions to improve the overall situation. The contrarian perspectives of indigenous peoples, government, private sector and international organisations shows the difficulty of finding acceptable compromises, although poverty reduction is a common goal. Both private and public sectors are in favour of FDIs and other investments into agriculture by using partly neoclassical and Keynesianism approaches. Indigenous peoples and international organisations focus on human rights and the unequal power of resources. First, the previously mentioned SGC methodology will be explained in detail. Secondly, the paper takes a closer look at the underlying theories. Thirdly, the arguments of the four different points of view will be portrayed. Afterwards the authors present their consensus approach.","PeriodicalId":35015,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy","volume":"13 1","pages":"280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2018.10018074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss potentials and problems for the Brazilian agricultural sector from different points of view by applying the surfing global change (SGC) methodology. The intention is to give relevant stakeholders room for statements and to find solutions to improve the overall situation. The contrarian perspectives of indigenous peoples, government, private sector and international organisations shows the difficulty of finding acceptable compromises, although poverty reduction is a common goal. Both private and public sectors are in favour of FDIs and other investments into agriculture by using partly neoclassical and Keynesianism approaches. Indigenous peoples and international organisations focus on human rights and the unequal power of resources. First, the previously mentioned SGC methodology will be explained in detail. Secondly, the paper takes a closer look at the underlying theories. Thirdly, the arguments of the four different points of view will be portrayed. Afterwards the authors present their consensus approach.
巴西农业部门:从不同角度看潜力和问题
本文旨在通过应用冲浪全球变化(SGC)方法,从不同的角度讨论巴西农业部门的潜力和问题。其目的是给相关利益相关者发言的空间,并找到改善整体局势的解决方案。尽管减少贫困是一个共同目标,但土著人民、政府、私营部门和国际组织的不同观点表明,很难找到可接受的妥协方案。私营和公共部门都支持外商直接投资和其他投资进入农业领域,这些投资采用了部分新古典主义和凯恩斯主义的方法。土著人民和国际组织关注人权和资源的不平等权力。首先,将详细解释前面提到的SGC方法。其次,本文对基础理论进行了更深入的研究。第三,将描述四种不同观点的论点。随后,作者提出了他们的共识方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy
International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The IJFIP has been established as a peer reviewed, international authoritative reference in the field. It publishes high calibre academic articles dealing with knowledge creation, diffusion and utilisation in innovation policy. The journal thus covers all types of Strategic Intelligence (SI). SI is defined as the set of actions that search, process, diffuse and protect information in order to make it available to the right person at the right time in order to make the right decision. Examples of SI in the domain of innovation include Foresight, Forecasting, Delphi studies, Technology Assessment, Benchmarking, R&D evaluation and Technology Roadmapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信