The moderating effect of generations on the relationship between work values and affective commitment

Gugup Wulandari, Kismono, Article Info
{"title":"The moderating effect of generations on the relationship between work values and affective commitment","authors":"Gugup Wulandari, Kismono, Article Info","doi":"10.20885/jsb.vol27.iss1.art1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose –This study compared Generation X and Y's work values and affective commitment and explored if generation moderates the relationship. This research is needed to elucidate generational disparities in work values, affective commitment, and work values' impact on affective commitment. Validating the global generation theory requires research involving Indonesians from different industries.\nDesign/methodology/approach – Data was acquired from 630 self-administered questionnaires from various businesses. The instruments used to measure variables have a track record of validity and reliability and were adapted from that work. The Chow Method was used to calculate the generational influence on affective commitment.\nFindings – The results demonstrated that Generation X and Generation Y in Indonesia had similar work values but differing affective commitment. Generation moderates the association between work values and affective commitment. This research reveals individuals with various life circumstances may still exhibit distinct character traits and value systems.\nResearch limitation/implications – The data may not capture the traits of all generations. Generalizations must be done with caution. Generation X and Y participants were not distributed proportionally. Prior research showed that the proportion of participants didn't alter the results, but future research may take distribution into account.\nPractical implications – Job sector classifications and job characteristics that are suitable for Generation X and Generation Y can be developed by considering the generations' unique preferences for various value components of employment.\nOriginality/value – This study added to our understanding of how different generations approach and value work in different ways. The implications of this study's findings for confirming the global theory of generation regarding work values and affective commitment are substantial. The results of this research demonstrated the importance of taking cultural factors into account while dealing with employees of varying ages.","PeriodicalId":31923,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Siasat Bisnis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Siasat Bisnis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol27.iss1.art1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose –This study compared Generation X and Y's work values and affective commitment and explored if generation moderates the relationship. This research is needed to elucidate generational disparities in work values, affective commitment, and work values' impact on affective commitment. Validating the global generation theory requires research involving Indonesians from different industries. Design/methodology/approach – Data was acquired from 630 self-administered questionnaires from various businesses. The instruments used to measure variables have a track record of validity and reliability and were adapted from that work. The Chow Method was used to calculate the generational influence on affective commitment. Findings – The results demonstrated that Generation X and Generation Y in Indonesia had similar work values but differing affective commitment. Generation moderates the association between work values and affective commitment. This research reveals individuals with various life circumstances may still exhibit distinct character traits and value systems. Research limitation/implications – The data may not capture the traits of all generations. Generalizations must be done with caution. Generation X and Y participants were not distributed proportionally. Prior research showed that the proportion of participants didn't alter the results, but future research may take distribution into account. Practical implications – Job sector classifications and job characteristics that are suitable for Generation X and Generation Y can be developed by considering the generations' unique preferences for various value components of employment. Originality/value – This study added to our understanding of how different generations approach and value work in different ways. The implications of this study's findings for confirming the global theory of generation regarding work values and affective commitment are substantial. The results of this research demonstrated the importance of taking cultural factors into account while dealing with employees of varying ages.
代际对工作价值观与情感承诺关系的调节作用
目的:本研究比较了X一代和Y一代的工作价值观和情感承诺,并探讨了年龄是否调节了两者之间的关系。本研究需要阐明工作价值观、情感承诺的代际差异,以及工作价值观对情感承诺的影响。验证全球生成理论需要涉及来自不同行业的印尼人的研究。设计/方法/方法-数据来自630份来自不同企业的自我管理问卷。用于测量变量的工具具有有效性和可靠性的跟踪记录,并且是根据该工作改编的。采用周氏法计算情感承诺的代际影响。研究结果-结果表明,印度尼西亚的X一代和Y一代具有相似的工作价值观,但情感承诺不同。代际调节了工作价值观与情感承诺之间的关系。这项研究揭示了不同生活环境下的个体可能仍然表现出不同的性格特征和价值体系。研究限制/影响-数据可能无法捕捉到所有世代的特征。概括必须谨慎。X世代和Y世代的参与者没有按比例分布。先前的研究表明,参与者的比例不会改变结果,但未来的研究可能会考虑分布。实际意义-考虑到X一代和Y一代对各种就业价值组成部分的独特偏好,可以制定适合X一代和Y一代的工作类别和工作特征。独创性/价值-这项研究增加了我们对不同时代的人如何以不同的方式处理和价值工作的理解。本研究结果对确认关于工作价值和情感承诺的全球生成理论具有重要意义。这项研究的结果表明,在与不同年龄的员工打交道时,考虑文化因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信