Acquisitive Prescription of Moveable Property under Russian Law

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
A. Rudokvas, Andrew J M Steven
{"title":"Acquisitive Prescription of Moveable Property under Russian Law","authors":"A. Rudokvas, Andrew J M Steven","doi":"10.3366/elr.2022.0760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Amid the welcome increase in comparative property law scholarship of recent times, particularly in Europe, Russia has been somewhat neglected. This article seeks to provide a start in bringing the rules and policy choices of Russian property law to the attention of an English-language readership. Its subject is acquisitive prescription of moveable property. Here the law as set out in the Russian Civil Code has been the subject of a series of court decisions. The principal analytical instrument chosen to act as a comparator is the Scottish Law Commission’s Report on Prescription and Title to Moveable Property of 2012. The recommendations made in that as yet unimplemented report were significantly influenced by the laws of other jurisdictions, although not Russian law. The article while unsurprisingly discovering commonalities given the shared Roman heritage also finds striking differences. These deserve consideration by legislators in both countries.","PeriodicalId":43268,"journal":{"name":"Edinburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edinburgh Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2022.0760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amid the welcome increase in comparative property law scholarship of recent times, particularly in Europe, Russia has been somewhat neglected. This article seeks to provide a start in bringing the rules and policy choices of Russian property law to the attention of an English-language readership. Its subject is acquisitive prescription of moveable property. Here the law as set out in the Russian Civil Code has been the subject of a series of court decisions. The principal analytical instrument chosen to act as a comparator is the Scottish Law Commission’s Report on Prescription and Title to Moveable Property of 2012. The recommendations made in that as yet unimplemented report were significantly influenced by the laws of other jurisdictions, although not Russian law. The article while unsurprisingly discovering commonalities given the shared Roman heritage also finds striking differences. These deserve consideration by legislators in both countries.
俄罗斯法律下动产的取得时效
近年来,特别是在欧洲,比较财产法的学术研究受到欢迎,但俄罗斯在某种程度上被忽视了。本文旨在提供一个开端,使俄罗斯物权法的规则和政策选择引起英语读者的注意。其主体为动产取得时效。在这方面,《俄罗斯民法典》所规定的法律已成为一系列法院判决的主题。选择作为比较的主要分析工具是苏格兰法律委员会2012年关于动产的时效和所有权的报告。这份尚未执行的报告中提出的建议受到其他司法管辖区法律的重大影响,尽管不是俄罗斯法律。这篇文章虽然不出所料地发现了共同的罗马遗产的共同点,但也发现了惊人的差异。这些值得两国立法者考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
72
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信