Survival trends for primary liver cancer, 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 578,740 patients from 187 population-based registries in 36 countries (CONCORD-2)

F. Bannon, V. D. Carlo, R. Harewood, G. Engholm, S. Ferretti, Christopher J. Johnson, J. Aitken, R. Marcos-Gragera, A. Bonaventure, A. Gavin, D. Huws, M. Coleman, C. Allemani
{"title":"Survival trends for primary liver cancer, 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 578,740 patients from 187 population-based registries in 36 countries (CONCORD-2)","authors":"F. Bannon, V. D. Carlo, R. Harewood, G. Engholm, S. Ferretti, Christopher J. Johnson, J. Aitken, R. Marcos-Gragera, A. Bonaventure, A. Gavin, D. Huws, M. Coleman, C. Allemani","doi":"10.21037/ace.2019.07.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Primary liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer world-wide, and the second most common cause of death from cancer, with an estimated 841,100 new cases and 781,500 deaths each year. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 60–80% of cases, and cholangiocarcinoma 10–40%. We examined global trends in survival for both these sub-types of liver cancer, by country, age, sex and calendar period. Methods: Data on 1,005,032 adults (aged 15–99 years) diagnosed with a primary, invasive malignant neoplasm of the liver or intrahepatic bile ducts between 1995 and 2009 were provided by 243 population-based cancer registries in 60 countries. Analysis was restricted to patients for whom the diagnosis of a primary malignancy had been confirmed by histological or cytological examination, or assignation of a specific morphology code, and to registries from which survival estimates were considered reliable. We estimated both five-year net survival and conditional five-year net survival, for patients who survived to the first anniversary of diagnosis. Funnel plots were used to examine international variation in survival and variation by age and morphology. \n Results: Data on 578,740 patients from 187 registries in 36 countries were included after quality control. For patients diagnosed during 2004–2009, the pooled estimate of age-standardised five-year net survival for liver cancer was 14.8% (range, 4.4–23.7%), higher than for patients diagnosed during 1995–2000 (11.0%). Survival for patients diagnosed with HCC during 2004–2009 (pooled estimate 17.4%, range 7.7–25.5%) was higher than for those with cholangiocarcinoma (8.4%, range 3.7–16.0%). Survival for patients diagnosed during 2004–2009 was higher in Canada, Italy, Japan, Taiwan and Korea (21.2–23.7%) than the pooled estimate for patients diagnosed some 10 years earlier (1995–2000; 11.0%). Conditional survival in 2004–2009 was also higher in New Zealand, Canada, Taiwan, Korea, and China (42.0–52.7%) than the pooled estimate for 1995–2000 (33.2%). \n Conclusions: Survival from primary cancers of the liver has increased, but it remains poor in most countries we have examined. International variation in survival highlights the potential to improve outcomes, but prevention must also remain a priority. There is a need for continued and expanded surveillance of survival, especially in low- and middle-income countries, to assess the impact of interventions in policy and treatment. Greater consistency in registration practice and coding of liver cancer would reduce the variation in data quality and further improve the comparability of survival estimates.","PeriodicalId":92868,"journal":{"name":"Annals of cancer epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of cancer epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ace.2019.07.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Primary liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer world-wide, and the second most common cause of death from cancer, with an estimated 841,100 new cases and 781,500 deaths each year. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 60–80% of cases, and cholangiocarcinoma 10–40%. We examined global trends in survival for both these sub-types of liver cancer, by country, age, sex and calendar period. Methods: Data on 1,005,032 adults (aged 15–99 years) diagnosed with a primary, invasive malignant neoplasm of the liver or intrahepatic bile ducts between 1995 and 2009 were provided by 243 population-based cancer registries in 60 countries. Analysis was restricted to patients for whom the diagnosis of a primary malignancy had been confirmed by histological or cytological examination, or assignation of a specific morphology code, and to registries from which survival estimates were considered reliable. We estimated both five-year net survival and conditional five-year net survival, for patients who survived to the first anniversary of diagnosis. Funnel plots were used to examine international variation in survival and variation by age and morphology. Results: Data on 578,740 patients from 187 registries in 36 countries were included after quality control. For patients diagnosed during 2004–2009, the pooled estimate of age-standardised five-year net survival for liver cancer was 14.8% (range, 4.4–23.7%), higher than for patients diagnosed during 1995–2000 (11.0%). Survival for patients diagnosed with HCC during 2004–2009 (pooled estimate 17.4%, range 7.7–25.5%) was higher than for those with cholangiocarcinoma (8.4%, range 3.7–16.0%). Survival for patients diagnosed during 2004–2009 was higher in Canada, Italy, Japan, Taiwan and Korea (21.2–23.7%) than the pooled estimate for patients diagnosed some 10 years earlier (1995–2000; 11.0%). Conditional survival in 2004–2009 was also higher in New Zealand, Canada, Taiwan, Korea, and China (42.0–52.7%) than the pooled estimate for 1995–2000 (33.2%). Conclusions: Survival from primary cancers of the liver has increased, but it remains poor in most countries we have examined. International variation in survival highlights the potential to improve outcomes, but prevention must also remain a priority. There is a need for continued and expanded surveillance of survival, especially in low- and middle-income countries, to assess the impact of interventions in policy and treatment. Greater consistency in registration practice and coding of liver cancer would reduce the variation in data quality and further improve the comparability of survival estimates.
1995-2009年原发性肝癌的生存趋势:对36个国家187个基于人群的登记处578,740名患者的个人数据分析(CONCORD-2)
背景:原发性肝癌是全球第五大常见癌症,也是癌症死亡的第二大常见原因,估计每年有841,100例新发病例和781,500例死亡。肝细胞癌(HCC)占60-80%,胆管癌占10-40%。我们按国家、年龄、性别和日历时期研究了这两种亚型肝癌的全球生存趋势。方法:来自60个国家的243个以人群为基础的癌症登记处,提供了1995年至2009年间诊断为原发性肝脏或肝内胆管浸润性恶性肿瘤的1,005,032名成年人(15-99岁)的数据。分析仅限于通过组织学或细胞学检查或指定特定形态学代码确认原发恶性肿瘤诊断的患者,以及被认为可靠的生存估计的登记。我们对存活到诊断一周年的患者的5年净生存率和有条件的5年净生存率进行了估计。漏斗图用于检查存活率的国际差异以及年龄和形态的差异。结果:在质量控制后纳入了来自36个国家187个登记处的578,740名患者的数据。对于2004-2009年诊断的患者,肝癌年龄标准化5年净生存率的汇总估计为14.8%(范围4.4-23.7%),高于1995-2000年诊断的患者(11.0%)。2004-2009年HCC患者的生存率(汇总估计17.4%,范围7.7-25.5%)高于胆管癌患者的生存率(8.4%,范围3.7-16.0%)。2004-2009年诊断的患者在加拿大、意大利、日本、台湾和韩国的生存率(21.2-23.7%)高于大约10年前诊断的患者的综合估计(1995-2000;11.0%)。2004-2009年,新西兰、加拿大、台湾、韩国和中国的条件生存率(42.0-52.7%)也高于1995-2000年的综合估计(33.2%)。结论:原发性肝癌的生存率有所增加,但在我们调查的大多数国家,生存率仍然很低。生存的国际差异突出了改善结果的潜力,但预防也必须仍然是一个优先事项。有必要继续和扩大生存监测,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,以评估政策和治疗干预措施的影响。肝癌登记实践和编码的更大一致性将减少数据质量的差异,并进一步提高生存估计的可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信