The dialogic nature of double consciousness and double stimulation: Implications from Peirce and Vygotsky

IF 1 1区 文学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Donna E. West
{"title":"The dialogic nature of double consciousness and double stimulation: Implications from Peirce and Vygotsky","authors":"Donna E. West","doi":"10.12697/SSS.2021.49.1-2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective in this paper is to demonstrate the indispensability of Peirce’s double consciousness to foster abductive reasoning, so that internal/external dialogue inform the worthiness of hunches. These forms of dialogue establish a mental give-and-take forum in which novel meanings/effects are particularly highlighted and noticed. Such attentional shifts are compelled by surprising states of affairs within the beholder’s internal, interpretive competencies, or from external factors (pictures, gestural or linguistic performatives). The dialogic nature of these signs pre-forms operations not possible non-dialogically; they command, interrogate, or suggest alterations to established conduct/beliefs in contexts in which propositional/argumentative conflicts are obviated. This inquiry proposes experimental methodologies to measure when double consciousness (via private/inner speech) mediates hypothesis-making. Vygotsky’s conflict of motive at four distinct developmental stages constitutes the foundation for the proposed experiments. Designs draw upon Vygotsky’s ‘double stimulation’ paradigms that force decision-making processes when conflicts of motive surface. Paradigms include forced imitation of one model while ignoring another (imitating bear, not dragon), and altering a visual array to depict logical sequencing accurately (the “Cycles Test”; “The Odd One Out”). These conflicts require children to change their conduct/beliefs to accommodate to atypical states of affairs.","PeriodicalId":44467,"journal":{"name":"Sign Systems Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"235-261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Systems Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.1-2.10","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The objective in this paper is to demonstrate the indispensability of Peirce’s double consciousness to foster abductive reasoning, so that internal/external dialogue inform the worthiness of hunches. These forms of dialogue establish a mental give-and-take forum in which novel meanings/effects are particularly highlighted and noticed. Such attentional shifts are compelled by surprising states of affairs within the beholder’s internal, interpretive competencies, or from external factors (pictures, gestural or linguistic performatives). The dialogic nature of these signs pre-forms operations not possible non-dialogically; they command, interrogate, or suggest alterations to established conduct/beliefs in contexts in which propositional/argumentative conflicts are obviated. This inquiry proposes experimental methodologies to measure when double consciousness (via private/inner speech) mediates hypothesis-making. Vygotsky’s conflict of motive at four distinct developmental stages constitutes the foundation for the proposed experiments. Designs draw upon Vygotsky’s ‘double stimulation’ paradigms that force decision-making processes when conflicts of motive surface. Paradigms include forced imitation of one model while ignoring another (imitating bear, not dragon), and altering a visual array to depict logical sequencing accurately (the “Cycles Test”; “The Odd One Out”). These conflicts require children to change their conduct/beliefs to accommodate to atypical states of affairs.
双重意识与双重刺激的对话性——皮尔斯与维果茨基的启示
本文的目的是证明皮尔斯的双重意识在培养溯因推理方面的必要性,从而使内部/外部对话告知直觉的价值。这些对话形式建立了一个心理上的互让论坛,在这个论坛中,新颖的含义/效果被特别强调和注意。这种注意力的转移是由观察者内部、解释能力或外部因素(图片、手势或语言表演)的令人惊讶的状态所驱动的。这些符号的对话性质预先形成了不可能非对话的操作;在避免命题/议论文冲突的情况下,他们命令、询问或建议改变既定的行为/信念。这项研究提出了实验方法来衡量双重意识(通过私人/内心言语)何时介导假设的形成。维果茨基在四个不同发展阶段的动机冲突构成了所提出的实验的基础。设计借鉴了维果茨基的“双重刺激”范式,当动机冲突浮出水面时,这种范式会迫使决策过程。范式包括强迫模仿一个模型而忽略另一个模型(模仿熊,而不是龙),以及改变视觉阵列以准确描述逻辑顺序(“循环测试”;“奇数一出”)。这些冲突要求儿童改变他们的行为/信仰,以适应非典型的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sign Systems Studies
Sign Systems Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信