Implementing Skills-Based Grading in a Linguistics Course

IF 1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Maura O’Leary, R. Stockwell
{"title":"Implementing Skills-Based Grading in a Linguistics Course","authors":"Maura O’Leary, R. Stockwell","doi":"10.1215/00031283-9940629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This paper discusses how to implement ‘Skills-Based Grading’ (SBG) in linguistics, with a university-level course in formal semantics as a case study. Particular focus is given to transitioning to SBG from traditional grading. Regardless, of the grading system, all courses start out from a set of desired learning objectives, with final grades intended to reflect the extent to which these objectives have been achieved. Traditionally, grades are determined by a series of mandatory assessments and tests, for which somewhere between partial and full credit is awarded. In this paper, we illustrate how mastery of learning outcomes can be more directly measured by re-packaging them as “skills”. In SBG, students are given multiple opportunities to demonstrate full mastery of each skill. However, grading is all-or-nothing, with no partial credit awarded. SBG has been shown to improve student learning, encourage effective study, lower student stress, and achieve more equitable outcomes, and has been successfully adapted for linguistics courses in phonology (Zuraw et al. 2019) and semantics (O’Leary & Stockwell 2021). Here, we offer step-by-step instructions for creating an SBG course, covering skill types, skill groupings, opportunities, grading, and assessments. Maura O’Leary is a Ph.D. Candidate Linguistics at Her pedagogical research focuses on equitable and inclusive methods for teaching and evaluation in university-level linguistics courses. Her dissertation provides a formal model of nominal evaluation times at the syntax-semantics interface, part of a larger research program on understudied effects of tense. She additionally conducts fieldwork on the critically endangered Alaskan Dene language Hän, and heads the Hän Revitalization Project. and Phrase Ellipsis: and Competition”.","PeriodicalId":46508,"journal":{"name":"American Speech","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Speech","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-9940629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. This paper discusses how to implement ‘Skills-Based Grading’ (SBG) in linguistics, with a university-level course in formal semantics as a case study. Particular focus is given to transitioning to SBG from traditional grading. Regardless, of the grading system, all courses start out from a set of desired learning objectives, with final grades intended to reflect the extent to which these objectives have been achieved. Traditionally, grades are determined by a series of mandatory assessments and tests, for which somewhere between partial and full credit is awarded. In this paper, we illustrate how mastery of learning outcomes can be more directly measured by re-packaging them as “skills”. In SBG, students are given multiple opportunities to demonstrate full mastery of each skill. However, grading is all-or-nothing, with no partial credit awarded. SBG has been shown to improve student learning, encourage effective study, lower student stress, and achieve more equitable outcomes, and has been successfully adapted for linguistics courses in phonology (Zuraw et al. 2019) and semantics (O’Leary & Stockwell 2021). Here, we offer step-by-step instructions for creating an SBG course, covering skill types, skill groupings, opportunities, grading, and assessments. Maura O’Leary is a Ph.D. Candidate Linguistics at Her pedagogical research focuses on equitable and inclusive methods for teaching and evaluation in university-level linguistics courses. Her dissertation provides a formal model of nominal evaluation times at the syntax-semantics interface, part of a larger research program on understudied effects of tense. She additionally conducts fieldwork on the critically endangered Alaskan Dene language Hän, and heads the Hän Revitalization Project. and Phrase Ellipsis: and Competition”.
在语言学课程中实施基于技能的评分
. 本文以大学形式语义学课程为例,探讨了如何在语言学教学中实施“技能分级”。特别侧重于从传统分级过渡到SBG。无论如何,无论评分制度如何,所有课程都是从一套预期的学习目标开始的,最终成绩旨在反映这些目标实现的程度。传统上,分数是由一系列强制性的评估和测试决定的,这些评估和测试在部分和全部学分之间。在本文中,我们说明了如何通过将学习成果重新包装为“技能”来更直接地衡量对学习成果的掌握。在SBG,学生有多种机会来展示每一项技能的完全掌握。然而,评分是全有或全无的,没有部分学分。SBG已被证明可以改善学生的学习,鼓励有效的学习,降低学生的压力,并获得更公平的结果,并已成功地适用于音韵学(Zuraw等人,2019)和语音学(O 'Leary & Stockwell, 2021)的语言学课程。在这里,我们为创建SBG课程提供一步一步的说明,涵盖技能类型,技能分组,机会,评分和评估。莫拉·奥利里(Maura O’leary)是语言学博士候选人,她的教学研究重点是大学语言学课程中公平和包容的教学和评估方法。她的论文在语法-语义界面上提供了一个名义评估时间的正式模型,这是一个关于时态未被充分研究的更大研究项目的一部分。此外,她还对极度濒危的阿拉斯加迪尼语Hän进行实地考察,并领导Hän振兴项目。和短语省略:和竞争”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Speech
American Speech Multiple-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: American Speech has been one of the foremost publications in its field since its founding in 1925. The journal is concerned principally with the English language in the Western Hemisphere, although articles dealing with English in other parts of the world, the influence of other languages by or on English, and linguistic theory are also published. The journal is not committed to any particular theoretical framework, and issues often contain contributions that appeal to a readership wider than the linguistic studies community. Regular features include a book review section and a “Miscellany” section devoted to brief essays and notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信