Determinants of Patient Care and Satisfaction in Pakistan- A Scoping Review

Z. Sarfraz, A. Sarfraz, Hafiza Hussain, F. Jabeen, Arham Nadeem, Shahar Bano, R. Kharal, Farah Zulfiqar, Sania Tariq, Zainab Fatima, M. Zafar
{"title":"Determinants of Patient Care and Satisfaction in Pakistan- A Scoping Review","authors":"Z. Sarfraz, A. Sarfraz, Hafiza Hussain, F. Jabeen, Arham Nadeem, Shahar Bano, R. Kharal, Farah Zulfiqar, Sania Tariq, Zainab Fatima, M. Zafar","doi":"10.37978/tijfs.v5i2.301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pakistan established the Punjab healthcare commission to improve patient care catering to professional accountability in the public and private sectors. As per the World Health Organization, quality of care comprises of six dimensions where the care must be effective, efficient, accessible, patient-centered, equitable, and safe. Objectives: The objectives are to determine if patients are satisfied with the quality of services in public and private sectors, or if any neglect was present. Methods: The literature on patient care and satisfaction was compiled using a scoping review methodology. PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and Scopus were used to collate information. Duplicates were removed using Endnote X9. Results: Of the 467 abstracts and titles that were screened for relevance, 74 were considered for full-text review and potential inclusion in the scoping review. Out of 16 included studies, 7 (43.8%) of the included studies originated from Pakistan. The characteristics of included studies such as quality of care and patient satisfaction are tabulated. Conclusion: Current literature does not provide quality- and satisfaction- focused studies, and has methodological discrepancies. It is required that the medical profession adopt a sense of self-monitoring. Gaps in service provision must be addressed by healthcare managers, policymakers, and physicians in Pakistan.","PeriodicalId":33951,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Frontier Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Frontier Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37978/tijfs.v5i2.301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Pakistan established the Punjab healthcare commission to improve patient care catering to professional accountability in the public and private sectors. As per the World Health Organization, quality of care comprises of six dimensions where the care must be effective, efficient, accessible, patient-centered, equitable, and safe. Objectives: The objectives are to determine if patients are satisfied with the quality of services in public and private sectors, or if any neglect was present. Methods: The literature on patient care and satisfaction was compiled using a scoping review methodology. PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and Scopus were used to collate information. Duplicates were removed using Endnote X9. Results: Of the 467 abstracts and titles that were screened for relevance, 74 were considered for full-text review and potential inclusion in the scoping review. Out of 16 included studies, 7 (43.8%) of the included studies originated from Pakistan. The characteristics of included studies such as quality of care and patient satisfaction are tabulated. Conclusion: Current literature does not provide quality- and satisfaction- focused studies, and has methodological discrepancies. It is required that the medical profession adopt a sense of self-monitoring. Gaps in service provision must be addressed by healthcare managers, policymakers, and physicians in Pakistan.
巴基斯坦患者护理和满意度的决定因素——范围界定综述
背景:巴基斯坦成立了旁遮普省医疗保健委员会,以改善患者护理,满足公共和私营部门的专业问责。根据世界卫生组织的说法,护理质量包括六个方面,其中护理必须有效、高效、可获得、以患者为中心、公平和安全。目的:目的是确定患者是否对公共和私营部门的服务质量感到满意,或者是否存在任何忽视。方法:采用范围界定法对患者护理和满意度文献进行整理。PubMed、CINAHL Plus和Scopus用于整理信息。使用尾注X9删除重复项。结果:在467篇经过相关性筛选的摘要和标题中,74篇被考虑进行全文审查,并可能纳入范围审查。在16项纳入的研究中,7项(43.8%)来自巴基斯坦。纳入研究的特征,如护理质量和患者满意度被制成表格。结论:目前的文献没有提供以质量和满意度为重点的研究,并且存在方法上的差异。医学界必须有自我监督的意识。巴基斯坦的医疗管理人员、政策制定者和医生必须解决服务提供方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信