Comparative study of pellets fired in pot grate and grate kiln pilot furnaces

Q2 Materials Science
S. Wendling, R. C. Nascimento, F. Wendling
{"title":"Comparative study of pellets fired in pot grate and grate kiln pilot furnaces","authors":"S. Wendling, R. C. Nascimento, F. Wendling","doi":"10.19150/MMP.7508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to study the quality of blast-furnace iron ore pellets with binary basicity 1 fired on a pilot scale using the two main firing processes that are presently in use in the world and comparing them. Currently, the great majority of pellet producers use the traveling grate process because of its higher production capacity. In this study, the physical and chemical qualities of the pellet feed, limestone, anthracite and bentonite were determined and the amount of additives for a blast furnace pellet with the defined basicity was calculated. The physical properties of the green and dried pellets were determined accordingly. Produced pellets, after being fired on a pilot scale using traveling grate and grate kiln, were subjected to chemical analysis and physical testing. No significant difference was observed in the metallurgical quality — that is, reducibility index (RI), reducing disintegration index (RDI) and swelling index (SWI) — of the pellets produced by both processes. However, a comparison of cold physical tests — tumble and cold compression strength — shows improved quality of the pellets fired using the grate kiln process.","PeriodicalId":18536,"journal":{"name":"Minerals & Metallurgical Processing","volume":"34 1","pages":"84-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.19150/MMP.7508","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerals & Metallurgical Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19150/MMP.7508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this research is to study the quality of blast-furnace iron ore pellets with binary basicity 1 fired on a pilot scale using the two main firing processes that are presently in use in the world and comparing them. Currently, the great majority of pellet producers use the traveling grate process because of its higher production capacity. In this study, the physical and chemical qualities of the pellet feed, limestone, anthracite and bentonite were determined and the amount of additives for a blast furnace pellet with the defined basicity was calculated. The physical properties of the green and dried pellets were determined accordingly. Produced pellets, after being fired on a pilot scale using traveling grate and grate kiln, were subjected to chemical analysis and physical testing. No significant difference was observed in the metallurgical quality — that is, reducibility index (RI), reducing disintegration index (RDI) and swelling index (SWI) — of the pellets produced by both processes. However, a comparison of cold physical tests — tumble and cold compression strength — shows improved quality of the pellets fired using the grate kiln process.
锅篦和篦窑中试炉焙烧球团的对比研究
本研究的目的是利用目前世界上使用的两种主要燃烧工艺,在中试规模上研究二元碱度为1的高炉铁矿石球团的质量并进行比较。目前,绝大多数颗粒生产商使用移动篦工艺,因为它的生产能力更高。在本研究中,对颗粒饲料、石灰石、无烟煤和膨润土的理化性质进行了测定,并计算了确定碱度的高炉球团的添加剂用量。据此测定了生丸和干丸的物理性质。生产的球团,在中试规模上使用移动篦和篦窑烧制后,进行化学分析和物理测试。两种工艺生产的球团在冶金质量,即还原性指数(RI)、还原性崩解指数(RDI)和溶胀指数(SWI)方面均无显著差异。然而,冷物理测试——翻滚和冷压缩强度——的比较表明,使用篦窑工艺烧制的球团质量有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerals & Metallurgical Processing
Minerals & Metallurgical Processing 工程技术-矿业与矿物加工
CiteScore
0.84
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over twenty-five years, M&MP has been your source for the newest thinking in the processing of minerals and metals. We cover the latest developments in a wide range of applicable disciplines, from metallurgy to computer science to environmental engineering. Our authors, experts from industry, academia and the government, present state-of-the-art research from around the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信