The effectiveness of advanced practice registered nurses with wound care specialization in the home setting on wound resolution and healthcare utilizationhe Home Setting on Wound Resolution and Healthcare Utilization

Todd Shaffett, Janet E Jones, Shaun Carpenter, Amanda Estapa, Tasha Mears, E. Creel
{"title":"The effectiveness of advanced practice registered nurses with wound care specialization in the home setting on wound resolution and healthcare utilizationhe Home Setting on Wound Resolution and Healthcare Utilization","authors":"Todd Shaffett, Janet E Jones, Shaun Carpenter, Amanda Estapa, Tasha Mears, E. Creel","doi":"10.5430/cns.v10n1p42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) with wound specialization on wound resolution and healthcare (HC) utilization for home health patients.Methods: A quasi-experimental design with a convenience sample of 30 participants admitted to home health (HH) services compared to a retrospective chart review of 46 participants matched in terms of volume, wound type, wound size, gender, and age was used during the study. The APRN conducted a physical exam and history, obtained wound photography, developed a treatment plan, performed therapy, wrote orders for products and services, and provided a minimum of weekly follow-up visits. Healthcare utilization comprised time for healing, admits to a higher level of care, and amputations. Wound resolution was observed at 80% and 100% closure.Results: The Intervention and Control Groups were comparable in terms of gender, wound type, age, and acuity, were similar regarding wounds per patient. Both groups achieved 80% volume, 80% area, and 100% wound resolution, regardless of wound types. The Intervention Group’s days to wound resolution was statistically significant for fewer days than the Control Group. This difference persisted after analysis of wound types within the groups. The Intervention Group had fewer acute care admits (10%) compared to the Control Group (50%), and the number of amputations was higher in the Control Group, with six amputations compared to only one in the Intervention Group.Conclusions: Using APRNs with wound specialization improved patient outcomes, efficiency, and costs. The program should be evaluated for adoption and expansion. Further research into the impact of wound-specialized APRNs in the home setting is recommended.","PeriodicalId":72616,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nursing studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nursing studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/cns.v10n1p42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) with wound specialization on wound resolution and healthcare (HC) utilization for home health patients.Methods: A quasi-experimental design with a convenience sample of 30 participants admitted to home health (HH) services compared to a retrospective chart review of 46 participants matched in terms of volume, wound type, wound size, gender, and age was used during the study. The APRN conducted a physical exam and history, obtained wound photography, developed a treatment plan, performed therapy, wrote orders for products and services, and provided a minimum of weekly follow-up visits. Healthcare utilization comprised time for healing, admits to a higher level of care, and amputations. Wound resolution was observed at 80% and 100% closure.Results: The Intervention and Control Groups were comparable in terms of gender, wound type, age, and acuity, were similar regarding wounds per patient. Both groups achieved 80% volume, 80% area, and 100% wound resolution, regardless of wound types. The Intervention Group’s days to wound resolution was statistically significant for fewer days than the Control Group. This difference persisted after analysis of wound types within the groups. The Intervention Group had fewer acute care admits (10%) compared to the Control Group (50%), and the number of amputations was higher in the Control Group, with six amputations compared to only one in the Intervention Group.Conclusions: Using APRNs with wound specialization improved patient outcomes, efficiency, and costs. The program should be evaluated for adoption and expansion. Further research into the impact of wound-specialized APRNs in the home setting is recommended.
具有伤口护理专业的高级执业注册护士在家庭环境中伤口解决和医疗保健利用的有效性
目的:本研究的目的是评估伤口专业化的高级执业注册护士(APRN)在家庭健康患者伤口解决和医疗保健(HC)利用方面的有效性。方法:在研究期间,使用了一种准实验设计,包括30名接受家庭健康(HH)服务的参与者的便利样本,与46名在体积、伤口类型、伤口大小、性别和年龄方面匹配的参与者的回顾性图表审查进行了比较。APRN进行了体检和病史,获得了伤口照片,制定了治疗计划,进行了治疗,编写了产品和服务订单,并提供了至少每周的随访。医疗利用率包括愈合时间、接受更高级别的护理和截肢。在80%和100%闭合时观察到伤口消退。结果:干预组和对照组在性别、伤口类型、年龄和视力方面具有可比性,在每位患者的伤口方面相似。无论伤口类型如何,两组都实现了80%的体积、80%的面积和100%的伤口消退。干预组的伤口愈合天数比对照组少,具有统计学意义。在对各组内的伤口类型进行分析后,这种差异仍然存在。与对照组(50%)相比,干预组的急性护理入院人数(10%)更少,对照组的截肢次数更高,有6次截肢,而干预组只有1次。结论:使用伤口专业化的APRN可以改善患者的预后、效率和成本。应评估该计划的采用和扩展情况。建议进一步研究创伤专用APRN在家庭环境中的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书