{"title":"Equity Implications in Evaluating Development Aid: The Italian Case","authors":"M. Forestieri","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v16i34.537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the field of development aid, social equity is an emerging issue that concerns the evaluation community in its theoretical and practical dimensions. \nPurpose: A widely held belief is that evaluators do not apply theory. In this paper, we intend to verify this statement about equity in the field of cooperation projects. \nSetting: Not applicable. \nIntervention: Not applicable. \nResearch Design: We considered equity-focused approaches and found three common factors: stakeholder participation, attention to context, and focus on marginalized groups. These elements operate as screening criteria in identifying equity issues in a case study. \nData Collection and Analysis: The paper examines a practical experience of Italian cooperation. This involved a review of evaluations reports completed between 2013 and 2014. The reports are analyzed according to the three screening criteria. \nFindings: The use of the three criteria has proved its worth in grasping the issues of equity neglected and often not recognized in reports. Once again a gap emerges between theory and practice. The availability of theoretical approaches is not sufficient. The paper, therefore, proposes a reflection on the responsibility of evaluation towards social justice. \nKeywords: social equity; development aid; theory and practice gap.","PeriodicalId":91909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v16i34.537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background: In the field of development aid, social equity is an emerging issue that concerns the evaluation community in its theoretical and practical dimensions.
Purpose: A widely held belief is that evaluators do not apply theory. In this paper, we intend to verify this statement about equity in the field of cooperation projects.
Setting: Not applicable.
Intervention: Not applicable.
Research Design: We considered equity-focused approaches and found three common factors: stakeholder participation, attention to context, and focus on marginalized groups. These elements operate as screening criteria in identifying equity issues in a case study.
Data Collection and Analysis: The paper examines a practical experience of Italian cooperation. This involved a review of evaluations reports completed between 2013 and 2014. The reports are analyzed according to the three screening criteria.
Findings: The use of the three criteria has proved its worth in grasping the issues of equity neglected and often not recognized in reports. Once again a gap emerges between theory and practice. The availability of theoretical approaches is not sufficient. The paper, therefore, proposes a reflection on the responsibility of evaluation towards social justice.
Keywords: social equity; development aid; theory and practice gap.