A Comparison between Word Tree Branch Method and Interactive Word Wall to Improve Student’s Vocabulary

Acuity Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI:10.35974/acuity.v3i2.650
Ribka Purnamasari, C. V. Katemba, N. Panjaitan
{"title":"A Comparison between Word Tree Branch Method and Interactive Word Wall to Improve Student’s Vocabulary","authors":"Ribka Purnamasari, C. V. Katemba, N. Panjaitan","doi":"10.35974/acuity.v3i2.650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to find out the improvement of students’ vocabulary between those who were taught through WTB (Word Tree Branch) or IWW (Interactive Word Wall).  This study used quantitative research method and comparative design by using pre-test and post-test. This study was designed to find out the answer to the following question: Is there any significant difference on the students’ vocabulary improvement between those who were taught through Word Tree Branch method and those who were taught through Interactive Word Wall method? The sample of this study are, two classes in grade VIII of SMPN 1 Parongpong, Bandung. They were divided into two classes, grade VIII H experienced Interactive word Wall and grade VIII J experienced Word Tree Branch. The instrument used for this study is vocabulary test, which contain 40 questions. The result of this study shows that the students who acquire WTB or IWW method were improved for their vocabulary, vocabulary categorized as “moderate” but there is no significant difference between those two groups of students ‘vocabulary improvement.   Keywords: WTB (Word Tree Branch) and IWW (Interactive Word Wall)  ","PeriodicalId":33744,"journal":{"name":"Acuity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acuity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v3i2.650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the improvement of students’ vocabulary between those who were taught through WTB (Word Tree Branch) or IWW (Interactive Word Wall).  This study used quantitative research method and comparative design by using pre-test and post-test. This study was designed to find out the answer to the following question: Is there any significant difference on the students’ vocabulary improvement between those who were taught through Word Tree Branch method and those who were taught through Interactive Word Wall method? The sample of this study are, two classes in grade VIII of SMPN 1 Parongpong, Bandung. They were divided into two classes, grade VIII H experienced Interactive word Wall and grade VIII J experienced Word Tree Branch. The instrument used for this study is vocabulary test, which contain 40 questions. The result of this study shows that the students who acquire WTB or IWW method were improved for their vocabulary, vocabulary categorized as “moderate” but there is no significant difference between those two groups of students ‘vocabulary improvement.   Keywords: WTB (Word Tree Branch) and IWW (Interactive Word Wall)  
单词树枝法与互动单词墙提高学生词汇量的比较
本研究的目的是找出通过WTB (Word Tree Branch)和IWW (Interactive Word Wall)进行教学的学生在词汇方面的进步。Â本研究采用定量研究方法,采用前测与后测相结合的比较设计。本研究旨在寻找以下问题的答案:采用单词树杈法教学的学生与采用互动词墙法教学的学生在词汇量的提高上是否存在显著差异?本研究的样本是,两个班的SMPN 1年级八年级Parongpong,万隆。他们被分为两个班,八年级H班体验互动字墙,八年级J班体验单词树枝。本研究使用的工具是词汇测试,包含40个问题。本研究结果表明,习得WTB或IWW方法的学生词汇量均有提高,词汇量归类为 - œmoderateâ -”,但两组学生之间的词汇量提高无显著差异。Â关键词:WTB (Word Tree Branch)和IWW (Interactive Word Wall) Â
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信