The travel of ideas: the dual structure of mobilized knowledge in the context of professional learning networks

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Livia A. J. Jesacher-Roessler
{"title":"The travel of ideas: the dual structure of mobilized knowledge in the context of professional learning networks","authors":"Livia A. J. Jesacher-Roessler","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-06-2020-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn the context of professional learning networks (PLNs), there are many studies which address knowledge mobilization (KMb). The majority of these focus on how research is mobilized by various actors. This paper explores the concepts of KMb both on an individual and an organizational level and discusses the role of PLN participants and PLNs as catalysts for institutional change (IC). To illustrate this, a model was developed which draws on a concept that depicts the mobilization processes at the various levels.Design/methodology/approachThe model was developed by drawing on theoretical approaches to both KMb on an individual and an organizational level of schools. The strengths and limitations of the model are then assessed as part of an exploratory study. Interviews of PLN participants (n = 7) from two schools and detailed logbooks of two participants were used to reconstruct experiences of KMb in the PLNs and the process of KMb among schools. By contrasting two schools, the study traces how mechanisms of KMb occurred. Data sources were analyzed using a structured content analysis alongside a deductive–inductive code system.FindingsThe results of the exploratory study show that, although the model is able to map the KMb practices, some refinement is still needed. While the extension of concepts describing the work of knowledge mobilizer (KM) leads to a more theoretically differentiated perspective, the data also showed that PLN participants only partially define themselves as KMs. The connection to concepts of strategies of knowledge mobilizing on an organizational level led to an increased transparency in the theoretical model. The data showed that KMb is influenced by organizational and individual beliefs.Originality/valueThe paper adds to the current knowledge base through a theoretical model that addresses the underinvestigated topic of KMb regarding the link between the individual and organizational levels. With a special focus on individual and organizational levels, a connection between KMb and IC is provided. The theoretical framework and research findings from an additional explorative study can be used to further develop relevant insights into the actions of participants from PLNs that enable IC processes among their schools.","PeriodicalId":44790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-06-2020-0048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeIn the context of professional learning networks (PLNs), there are many studies which address knowledge mobilization (KMb). The majority of these focus on how research is mobilized by various actors. This paper explores the concepts of KMb both on an individual and an organizational level and discusses the role of PLN participants and PLNs as catalysts for institutional change (IC). To illustrate this, a model was developed which draws on a concept that depicts the mobilization processes at the various levels.Design/methodology/approachThe model was developed by drawing on theoretical approaches to both KMb on an individual and an organizational level of schools. The strengths and limitations of the model are then assessed as part of an exploratory study. Interviews of PLN participants (n = 7) from two schools and detailed logbooks of two participants were used to reconstruct experiences of KMb in the PLNs and the process of KMb among schools. By contrasting two schools, the study traces how mechanisms of KMb occurred. Data sources were analyzed using a structured content analysis alongside a deductive–inductive code system.FindingsThe results of the exploratory study show that, although the model is able to map the KMb practices, some refinement is still needed. While the extension of concepts describing the work of knowledge mobilizer (KM) leads to a more theoretically differentiated perspective, the data also showed that PLN participants only partially define themselves as KMs. The connection to concepts of strategies of knowledge mobilizing on an organizational level led to an increased transparency in the theoretical model. The data showed that KMb is influenced by organizational and individual beliefs.Originality/valueThe paper adds to the current knowledge base through a theoretical model that addresses the underinvestigated topic of KMb regarding the link between the individual and organizational levels. With a special focus on individual and organizational levels, a connection between KMb and IC is provided. The theoretical framework and research findings from an additional explorative study can be used to further develop relevant insights into the actions of participants from PLNs that enable IC processes among their schools.
思想的旅行:专业学习网络背景下动员知识的双重结构
在专业学习网络(PLNs)的背景下,有许多研究涉及知识动员(KMb)。其中大多数侧重于研究如何由各种行动者动员起来。本文探讨了九巴在个人和组织层面的概念,并讨论了九巴网络参与者和九巴网络作为制度变革催化剂的作用。为了说明这一点,开发了一个模型,该模型借鉴了一个描述各级动员过程的概念。设计/方法/方法该模型是根据九巴在个人和学校组织层面的理论方法发展而成。然后,作为探索性研究的一部分,评估该模型的优势和局限性。通过对两所学校的7名学生的访谈和两名学生的详细日志,我们重建了两所学校的九巴经验和九巴在学校之间的过程。通过对两种学派的对比,本研究追溯了九巴的发生机制。使用结构化内容分析和演绎-归纳代码系统对数据源进行分析。结果探索性研究结果显示,该模型虽能反映九巴的运作情况,但仍需进一步完善。虽然描述知识动员者(KM)工作的概念的扩展导致了一个更理论化的视角,但数据也表明,PLN参与者只是部分地将自己定义为KM。与组织层面的知识动员战略概念的联系导致理论模型的透明度增加。数据显示,九巴受到组织信念和个人信念的影响。原创性/价值这篇论文通过一个理论模型来解决九巴在个人和组织层面之间的联系这一未被充分研究的话题,从而增加了现有的知识基础。在个人和机构层面上,提供九巴与集成电路之间的联系。另一项探索性研究的理论框架和研究结果可用于进一步发展相关见解,了解pln参与者在其学校中实现IC过程的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Journal of Professional Capital and Community EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信