Retirement experience, retirement satisfaction and life satisfaction of baby boomers

Q3 Nursing
Amberyce Ang, Cynthia Chen, Kalyani Mehta
{"title":"Retirement experience, retirement satisfaction and life satisfaction of baby boomers","authors":"Amberyce Ang, Cynthia Chen, Kalyani Mehta","doi":"10.1108/wwop-03-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe practice of mandatory retirement age implies that some retirees may be forced to retire or are compelled to continue working. Retirement would then be determined by age and not by their personal choices. Against this backdrop, this study aims to understand the associations retirement transition types (voluntary or involuntary retirement) with retirement satisfaction and life satisfaction.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis mixed research study seeks to understand how the retirement transition type in the form of voluntary or involuntary retirement is associated with retirement satisfaction and life satisfaction. In this study, 103 Singapore baby boomer retirees were interviewed and a questionnaire was administered.\n\n\nFindings\nResults showed that voluntary retirement and high social–emotional resources had significant positive associations with retirement satisfaction, and that financial resources and retirement satisfaction had significant associations with life satisfaction.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nBased on this study’s findings, a synthesized conceptual model was designed to illustrate the different roles and associations of resources with retirement satisfaction and life satisfaction. A retirement trajectory model was also created to cater for policy design at various stages of the retirement experience.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe retirement experience is multi-dimensional. It is highly relevant to almost every older adult. The relevance of this topic also meant that the findings in this study carry a potentially higher impact. Using the life span and multi-level perspectives to examine retirement, the findings in this study invite several timely human resources (HR) and national policy reviews. This paper proposed HR policy practices at three main points – late-career, retirement and bridge employment.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nA unique feature of this study was to differentiate and compare “retirement satisfaction” with “life satisfaction”, and the differentiation of “retirement transition”, “retirement adjustment” and the “retirement trajectory”. The differentiation of these concepts can better shape policies targeted at different phases of the retirement experience. In addition, the resource-based dynamic perspective was used to identify and understand the types of resources that have significant associations with retirement and life satisfaction. For example, social–emotional resources were found to be significantly associated with retirement satisfaction, and financial resources were found to be significantly associated with life satisfaction.\n","PeriodicalId":53659,"journal":{"name":"Working with Older People","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Working with Older People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-03-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The practice of mandatory retirement age implies that some retirees may be forced to retire or are compelled to continue working. Retirement would then be determined by age and not by their personal choices. Against this backdrop, this study aims to understand the associations retirement transition types (voluntary or involuntary retirement) with retirement satisfaction and life satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach This mixed research study seeks to understand how the retirement transition type in the form of voluntary or involuntary retirement is associated with retirement satisfaction and life satisfaction. In this study, 103 Singapore baby boomer retirees were interviewed and a questionnaire was administered. Findings Results showed that voluntary retirement and high social–emotional resources had significant positive associations with retirement satisfaction, and that financial resources and retirement satisfaction had significant associations with life satisfaction. Research limitations/implications Based on this study’s findings, a synthesized conceptual model was designed to illustrate the different roles and associations of resources with retirement satisfaction and life satisfaction. A retirement trajectory model was also created to cater for policy design at various stages of the retirement experience. Practical implications The retirement experience is multi-dimensional. It is highly relevant to almost every older adult. The relevance of this topic also meant that the findings in this study carry a potentially higher impact. Using the life span and multi-level perspectives to examine retirement, the findings in this study invite several timely human resources (HR) and national policy reviews. This paper proposed HR policy practices at three main points – late-career, retirement and bridge employment. Originality/value A unique feature of this study was to differentiate and compare “retirement satisfaction” with “life satisfaction”, and the differentiation of “retirement transition”, “retirement adjustment” and the “retirement trajectory”. The differentiation of these concepts can better shape policies targeted at different phases of the retirement experience. In addition, the resource-based dynamic perspective was used to identify and understand the types of resources that have significant associations with retirement and life satisfaction. For example, social–emotional resources were found to be significantly associated with retirement satisfaction, and financial resources were found to be significantly associated with life satisfaction.
婴儿潮一代的退休经历、退休满意度和生活满意度
目的强制退休年龄的做法意味着一些退休人员可能被迫退休或被迫继续工作。退休将由年龄决定,而不是由他们的个人选择决定。在此背景下,本研究旨在了解退休过渡类型(自愿或非自愿退休)与退休满意度和生活满意度的关系。设计/方法/方法这项混合研究旨在了解自愿或非自愿退休形式的退休过渡类型与退休满意度和生活满意度之间的关系。在这项研究中,103名新加坡婴儿潮一代退休人员接受了采访,并进行了问卷调查。研究结果表明,自愿退休和高社会情感资源与退休满意度呈正相关,经济资源和退休满意度与生活满意度呈正相关。研究局限性/含义基于本研究的发现,设计了一个综合概念模型来说明资源与退休满意度和生活满意度的不同作用和关联。还创建了一个退休轨迹模型,以满足退休经历各个阶段的政策设计。实际含义退休体验是多维度的。它与几乎每一个老年人都高度相关。这一主题的相关性也意味着这项研究的发现可能具有更高的影响。利用寿命和多层次的视角来考察退休情况,本研究的发现邀请了几次及时的人力资源和国家政策审查。本文从职业生涯后期、退休和过渡就业三个主要方面提出了人力资源政策实践。原创性/价值本研究的一个独特之处是区分和比较“退休满意度”和“生活满意度”,以及“退休过渡”、“退休调整”和“退休轨迹”的区别。这些概念的差异化可以更好地制定针对退休经历不同阶段的政策。此外,基于资源的动态视角被用于识别和理解与退休和生活满意度有重大关联的资源类型。例如,社会情感资源与退休满意度显著相关,经济资源与生活满意度显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Working with Older People
Working with Older People Nursing-Community and Home Care
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信